Constitutional Convention Pros And Cons

543 Words3 Pages

Madeline Murga Professor Manny Ontiveros Political Science 180 13 April 2017 The Constitutional Convention In May 14, 1787 The Philadelphia Convention took place in the State House which is now the Independence Hall today. Several meetings took place during the summer to discuss ways they could improve the Articles of Confederation. One of the main arguments they had was they wanted to build a new government that would meet their expectations. There was also a lot of delegates whom didn’t show up and only 12 out of 13 states showed. Rhode Island was one of the states who didn’t send any delegates to the meetings. The three proposals which were debated at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia were the Virginia Plan, New Jersey Plan, and the Great Compromise. The Virginia Plan was written by James Maddison but was presented by Edmund Randolph. It was known as a large state and what this plan proposed was having a strong central government that could collect tax and make stricter laws. Which was made up of three separate branches. The legislative, executive, and judicial. The legislative was the most powerful and would be bicameral which was based on population. This large state thought they …show more content…

What they proposed was to have the same level of power as the larger states. The New Jersey plan was created because of the Virginia Plan had more power and New Jersey Plan would have less say in the government. The more people the state had, the more representatives it would have in the legislature. They wanted equal representation and also wanted a unicameral legislature of only one house. Similar to The Virginia Plan they wanted to collect taxes and control commerce. The New Jersey Plan was a multi person Executive Branch chosen by Congress. They had one Supreme Court which was establish by the Executive Branch. Which it wasn’t much different by the Articles of