ipl-logo

Constitutional Convention Versus The Great Compromise

520 Words3 Pages

In the summer of 1787, a Constitutional Convention was called to revise the Articles of Confederation. Many of the delegates intended to use this convention as a way of drafting a new constitution. The main issue discussed in the convention was representation of the states. The Articles stated that each state had a single vote in Congress, but the bigger states wanted representation based on population. James Madison then proposed the Virginia Plan, and the larger states supported his idea. However, William Paterson proposed the New Jersey plan, which received an equal amount of support from the smaller states. This conflict nearly tore the convention apart, but Roger Sherman came up with the Great Compromise, or the Connecticut Compromise. The compromise proposed of having two houses, one of which would be based on proportional representation, and the other being of equal …show more content…

The Constitution was to be ratified by a special ratifying convention instead of the state legislature. The people fought hard for ratification of the Constitution for a long time. Those who supported the ratification were called Federalists, and those who opposed it were called Anti-Federalists. The Federalists went against the Articles of Confederation, whereas the Anti-Federalists supported a House of Representative which consisted of substantive power. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, whom are all Federalists, wrote The Federalist Papers - a series of essays. The essays talked about the Constitution and "defended its provision." They defended the Bill of Rights, which is the weakest point of the Constitution. Patrick Henry, an Anti-Federalist, believed that the Constitution could bring a "dangerously powerful government," so that is why he attacked the Constitution. Eventually, most of the Anti-Federalists were persuaded by the Federalists'

Show More
Related

Shay's Rebellion Dbq Essay

867 Words | 4 Pages

The Virginia Plan proposed getting rid of the articles all together which would give congress the power to legislate with a two house legislature and would be votes would be based off the population of the state. The New Jersey plan on the other hand wanted to tweak the articles, wanted only a one house legislature, and only allowed each state one vote. Between the two, a compromise was made known simply as the Great Compromise. The issue of representation was solved because a two house legislature was decided upon, the senate would represent the states and the house of representative would be responsible for representing the people equally. Now that the government

Read More

Summary Of The Federalist No. 10

827 Words | 4 Pages

These people were known as the Anti-federalist and wrote their own essays as to what they believed, they also looked more to the Articles of Confederation because it did not look at the central government as much. On the other hand, the Federalist approved of the central government and are a strong supporter of the Constitution. The Federalist papers overall created and unified our government, because without the separation of powers we would not have a strong government because every state will act as their own. At the end once the ratification of the

Read More

Articles Of Confederation Dbq Essay

959 Words | 4 Pages

constitution and it failed. Shay’s Rebellion showed the weaknesses of this document, which resulted in the revision at the constitutional convention. Representation between large states and smaller states and slavery were heavily discussed in this convention. At the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, two documents called the Virginia Plan and New Jersey Plan were proposed for representation, and a compromise was made. The new U.S. Constitution declares that states would be equally represented in the upper house of Congress.

Read More

Justifying The Constitution Dbq Essay

1378 Words | 6 Pages

This is the place the battle to approve the constitution started. The Anti-Federalists had numerous focal contentions against the selection of the Constitution. The advocates, the Federalist proposed a superior contention for shielding the approval of the new Constitution which made them win. The Anti-Federalist were those men who contradicted the endorsement of the Constitution in 1789.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Great Compromise

337 Words | 2 Pages

How two big arguments turned into big agreements. A Compromise is when two people or states can't agree on something because they both want something different. The two compromises that came out of the constitutional convention are the Great Compromise and the ⅗ Compromise. The Great Compromise was an agreement between the larger states and the smaller states about their representation. The first plan was the Virginia plan which had the senate and the House of Representatives and this made it where it was based on the people which meant if the people in a certain amount from each state voted on something then it would be passed and in the states, this plan favored the larger states because of their larger populations.

Read More

Constitutional Convention Dbq Essay

629 Words | 3 Pages

The first kind was mentioned by politicians Roger Sherman. and Oliver Ellsworth of Connecticut. They appeared in the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia with an unpleasant manner toward the Virginia Plan and its new purpose to give more power to Congress and to reduce the states’ role in America system. These two delegates achieved considerable success in demonstrating this plan in the direction of federal principles. But in the end the powers of Congress are listed clearly, each state will be represented equally in the Senate and composed of Senators elected by the state legislatures, the president will be elected by a majority of the people and a majority of the

Read More

Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of The Constitutional Convention

637 Words | 3 Pages

The main goal was to create an effective federal government, while safeguarding individual liberties. The debates were heated and there were several divisions, however three key compromises made the Constitution possible. The first issue was about giving fair representation to both large and small states. James Madison’s, Virginia Plan proposed to create a Congress with

Read More

To What Extent Was The Constitutional Convention Of 1787

584 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 brought politicians from different states together in order to create a more complex and centralized form of government. The Virginia Plan was brought forward by James Madison, a representative of Virginia, who wanted to create a more centralized and powerful national government, that would benefit the larger states if it was implemented. The main political dilemma was to construct a central government that would provide the necessary national goods without interfering or endangering the power of the states. Some of the issues discussed at the Convention that were brought forward by the representatives were congressional representation, the appointment of House seats, the national assumption of state debts, the regulation of tariffs and the presidential powers, which were later on incorporated in what is known today as the Constitution.

Read More

The Argument Against The Anti-Federalists

99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More

The Three Compromises Made In The Constitutional Convention

1593 Words | 7 Pages

After deciding to write a new constitution, the delegates could not decide what new form the government should take. One of the options was the Virginia Plan created by Edmund Randolph and James Madison. The plan included a strong government with three branches (the legislative branch, The judicial branch, and the executive branch). In the Virginia Plan, the legislator would consist of two houses and seats would be awarded on the basis of the population. Due to the fact that the seats are awarded based on population, larger states would have more representatives than smaller states.

Read More

Essay On New Jersey Plan

287 Words | 2 Pages

The New Jersey Plan was one option in the matter of how the United States would be spoken to. The Plan required each state to have one vote in Congress as opposed to the amount of votes being established on people. This was to secure the equalization of the states paying little regard to people size. The New Jersey Plan was familiar with the Constitutional Convention by William Paterson, a New Jersey delegate, on June 15, 1787. The Constitutional Convention was met to change the Articles of Confederation, yet it got the chance to be apparent that another governing body would ought to be made.

Read More

Central Focus And Purpose Of The Constitutional Convention

647 Words | 3 Pages

The Virgina Plan wanted state representation based on population, while the New Jersey Plan wanted the states to have equal representation. This was resolved by the Great Compromise that created the House of Representatives (based on population) and the Senate (equal representation). The Constitution was created due to the weakness of government caused by the Articles of Confederation. The Federalists wanted the new Constitution and a stronger government. The Anti-Federlaists opposed the new constitution and didn’t want a strong central government.

Read More

Compare And Contrast The Bill Of Rights And Anti Federalists

880 Words | 4 Pages

Anti Federalists were the people that kept individual rights still today. They did not like the Constitution and wanted all the power to be held within the states. The anti federalists felt that a strong national government threatened people and state’s rights. Federalists opposed the Articles of Confederation, they wanted a strong national government under the Constitution. The people thought the Constitution needed to be ratified, by adding the Bill of Rights to protect people’s rights and freedoms.

Read More

Ratification Of The Constitution Essay

494 Words | 2 Pages

They felt the Constitution would create a system of federalism, a system in which the national government holds significant power, but the smaller political subdivisions also hold significant power. They felt the country needed a strong central government so that it didn’t fall apart. The Ant-Federalists were on the opposing side, they felt the Constitution granted the government too much power. They also felt there wasn’t enough protection of their right with an absent Bill of Rights. Another concern of the Anti-Federalists mainly came from the lower classes, from their standpoint they thought the wealthy class would be in main control and gain the most benefits from the ratification of this document.

Read More

More about Constitutional Convention Versus The Great Compromise

Open Document