More handpicked essays just for you.
How did philip ii extend spain's power essay
How did philip ii extend spain's power essay
Philip II of Spain essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In addition, he increased his army to gain more territory. Peter the Great centralized his power through fear of the people, built up his army from nothing, and what also made him an absolute monarch was he did not share his power with anyone at all. Louis XIV is the best example of an absolute monarch because he had all four characteristics. He did not share his power with anyone or any organization. He limited the power of his nobles and princes by having them live in his palace where their power would have been void.
he Natives were being treated unfairly by the Puritans caused the King Philip’s War of 1675. King Philip's believed that the colonists took his land without his permission. In document A, “King Philip’s Perspective” King Philip stated, “the English made them drunk and then cheated them ; that now, they had no hope left to keep any land.” Both authors in both documents wrote that King Philip lost land from the colonists. In document B, “Colonists‘ Perspective” Edward Randolph said, “God is punishing them for their behavior."
During the period 1450-1750 CE, both maritime and land based empires formed for economic incentives such as profit, resources,and expansion. However, the differences between the land based and maritime empires is, some promoted direct and indirect rule, syncretism, and religious toleration. Spain and Portugal were both Maritime based empires. Whereas, the Mughal and the Ming empire were mainly land based. Both Land based and Maritime empires shared the same economic idea of mercantilism and expansion.
“Philip the II succeeded his father as the sovereign of Spain,Sicily,MIlian, the Netherlands,France Carte Mexico, and Peru” ( Lincoln Library Press).” Although Philip’s region extended for over 40 years in many ways he never outlasted the enormous shadow of his father” (Lincoln Library Press). Charles V had a better reign and left spain in a much better place than Philip II.Charles V unparalleled successes in the New World, and kept Spain at the very pinnacle of world power, a position she did not relinquish for 100 years(World History in Context). Also Philip’s II rule was not as good as his father's rule was because Philip tried to force policies on to his people which Charles the V did not do(OI). Since Philip II tried forcing policies on The Netherlands, which made the Netherlands revolt and it allowed the Netherlands to gain their independence after a long war that took 82
But ultimately, his policies were detrimental and left Spain in a very unstable condition. Philip II was born in Spain in 1527, to his father, King Charles V, and his mother, Isabella, of Portugal. His father Charles was crowned Holy Roman emperor and ruled over a large portion of Europe. As a prince, Philip spent time travelling around Europe. He visited Germany, Italy, and the Netherlands.
As a halfblooded Lancaster and Yorkist, he married the Yorkist Elizabeth and consolidated his claim on the throne. Furthermore, with both Lancaster and Yorkists represented on the throne, the citizens had nothing to fight over. Although sympathizers of Edward and the Yorkist remained, the issues subsided with the death of Warwick and Warbeck. The peace during his reign paved the opportunity for renaissance and reformation
According to the Declaration of Independence, King George III was responsible for the American rebellion against the British Empire. The colonists listed 27 abuses committed by the king in the document. These repeated maltreatments established a tyrannical government in North America, which eventually led to the colonist’s revolt. The first 12 abuses established King George III’s authority as despotic instead of allowing a representative government for the colonists. For example: abuses 8 and 9 explains how King George III would further tighten his control through the judiciary.
Such as Frederick William I of Prussia, otherwise known as “The Soldier King”. He increased his army, and land which therefore increased his power over the country. By increasing his army he made his country feel safe, and instilled fear in his people. This caused for his power over the people to increase therefore allowing him to become an absolute monarch. Louis the XIV also increased his military powers, which increased his total power.
During the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, leaders all around Europe were beginning to desire a stronger rule over their people. In numerous countries, absolutism was becoming a popular way to rule a nation, as it gave leaders the ability to have full control over their territory. Many believed that leaders became absolute through the power of God and divine right. However, rulers were able to gain power through military pursuits and well-controlled foreign relations. Therefore, international war gave leaders in Prussia, Russia, and Austria the foothold they needed to create absolute monarchies.
King Philip’s War, also known as The First Indian War, was the Native American’s (in Southern New England) last attempt at saving their lands from colonial expansion. The tribes involved with fighting back to the English Settlers were the Pokanoket, Nipmucks, Naragansetts, and Pocumtucks. The resistance were led under Chief Metacon of the Pokunoket Tribe. This desperate uprising persisted for 14 months, which, in result, took 12 towns on the frontier. After the 14 months of war, Chief Metacom was captured by the English Settlers and executed.
Alexander The Great’s title of “The Great” was not an exaggeration. To earn the title of “The Great”, you must've done some extremely good things as your reign as a king, queen, or emperor. Alexander The Great did many great and powerful things during his lifetime. He established an extremely powerful military, and he knew how to strategically conquer land, and he was interested in turning this conquered land into powerful areas.
Also, during this time period, Frederick William I transformed Prussia into a military state. To become an absolute ruler, Peter the Great made many reforms throughout Russia. However, all these absolute leaders had the same goal. Even though they reigned over different countries, they all strengthened their armies, raised taxes, and unified religion. One thing that all absolute rulers did was increase the strength of their army.
Art often reflects the sentiments from the time it was created. As Shakespeare asserted in his play Hamlet, the “purpose of playing” is “to hold as ‘twere the mirror up to nature” conveying the idea that art should reflect our reality (Schloss). This can be applied to all art, including religious art. From the 12th to 17th centuries in Northern Europe, the culture and the style of religious art changed to better reflect the tensions and reality that many were living in. Religious art from the 12th to the 17th century in Northern Europe evolved stylistically due to reformations within the church.
She was betrothed to Arthur the son of Henry VII of England at age three. This created peace between Spain and England. Six short months later
What Peter the Great and Louis XIV did with their new armies were similar because of their
