Copernicus's On The Revolutions Of The Heavenly Spheres

433 Words2 Pages

There are several different strategies as to most likely why Copernicus was not put on trial unlike Galileo. In regards to the Introduction of Book I in, On the Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres, Copernicus jumps right out of the gate stating how he is aware that it is not wise to go against the grain of the liberal disciplines. I strongly suggest that he is strategizing and trying to appeal to logos for the reader(s) of that time that and show that he can relate to them. In the virtue of when Copernicus says, “I have no doubt that certain of the savants have taken grave offense and think it wrong to raise any disturbance among liberal disciplines,” (Copernicus 1). He exhibits his information in such a way that shows how hard he has scrutinized his theories instead of merely pondering on some random thought that …show more content…

He is interested in gelling old premises with new ones to be able to get a unique and more profound outcome that way, because he claims that the astronomers cannot bring anything concrete to the table. This proposes that he has better suggestions to offer, perhaps making him more credible. Additionally, once again Copernicus claims how he is aware that he would possibly be, “hooted off the stage,” (Copernicus 2). Affirming that, he re-emphasizes the opposed to his theories. Yet, he turns it around to introduce the fact that what he is doing pertains to the Church doctrine. Copernicus asserts, “I realize that the conceptions of a philosopher are placed beyond the judgment of the crowd, because it his loving duty to seek the truth in all things, in so far as God has granted to human reason. I have concluded from that he is sending out a message to the reader(s) that he has the right to proclaim his thoughts on the Universe because technically it is fine with

More about Copernicus's On The Revolutions Of The Heavenly Spheres