ipl-logo

Cornie V. Arnie Case Study

236 Words1 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Search and seizure cases

1. What constitutional rights were violated? How were they violated? Breaking and entering, illegal search, and questioning a suspect without informing him of his rights were the constitutional rights violated in this scenario. Arnie and the officer entered into the suspects home without a warrant or probable cause and they then proceeded to search his house illegal and used the evidence in the house to question him without using informing him of his rights. 2. What would have been the proper investigative steps to take? The right investigative steps would be to watch the man and when they had probable cause or enough evidence for a warrant then they could take action. They could ask to come in and if he lets them in and they find something in plain view then they can use that to arrest him. They should inform him of his rights before they ask him any questions. …show more content…

If the suspect had refused to answer questions and demanded that he be appointed a lawyer, what “pressures” could Arnie have placed on the suspect? Arnie could tell him this is only going to make it worse for you. Arnie could also say that with or without a lawyer the witnesses, fingerprints, gun, and money are enough for him to go to jail. If he cooperates now then all of that can be avoided and he can tell the judge he was

Show More
Related
214 Words | 1 Pages

Nature of the Case: The amount of damages owed to a wrongfully discharged employee, when the promising entity chooses to not hold up their end of the contract instead attempting to mitigate the potential damages with an offer of employment in a lesser project. Facts: The Plaintiff, actress Shirley Maclaine was contracted with the defendant to perform in a musical called “Bloomer Girl”. However the defendant, Twentieth Century-Fox chose not to produce the film instead choosing to produce a western titled “Big Country, Big Man”.

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

The case involves the question of whether or not the police were within their rights to search the trash that was left at the curbside without a warrant. The amendment

Read More
899 Words | 4 Pages

This applies to Sam Wardlow’s situation in which evidence was founded illegally without a proper search warrant. Also, the weapon that was found in Sam’s bag does not relate to any prior crime that may connect him to. This is not in anyway, allowed for officer Nolan to have even stopped Mr.Wardlow. Possibly, if Sam was connected to a crime beforehand and if the officers did have a proper search warrant. Then there is no way Sam’s rights were violated.

Read More
519 Words | 3 Pages

Gates counsel argued that law enforcement lack of sufficient probable cause for a warrant was a fourth amendment violation. The decision of the Trail Courts, was upheld by The Appellate Court. The court used the example of Spinelli v. United States,

Read More
428 Words | 2 Pages

The student’s voluntarily provided the officer with additional drugs and provided written consent, to a search of the room although they had the right to refuse the search and demand a search warrant. Reasoning/Analysis of the Court The Court held that the "plain view" exception to the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement permitted the officers to seize clearly incriminating evidence discovered "in a place where the officer has a right to be." The Court held that the officer had a right to be at the first students’ elbow at all times. The officer obtained lawful access to the student’s dorm room and was free to seize incriminating evidence.

Read More
475 Words | 2 Pages

The Weeks v United States case was the Supreme Court basis in determining to incorporate the Fourth Amendment into the Fourteenth Amendment due process clause and apply the exclusionary rule in state cases. In this essay, I am going to discuss the reason why the Supreme Court determine that the exclusionary rule should apply to the state police activity. Prior to the case of Weeks v United States, the state police activity “were not limited in their conduct by the Fourth Amendment” (Ingram p.81) and the exclusionary rule of Fourth Amendments illegal search and seizure only applies to federal law enforcement officers. Basically, it means that state law enforcement officials can illegally search and seized criminal activity evidence and court don’t prohibit the use of illegally obtained evidence in the trial court.

Read More
602 Words | 3 Pages

In 1988, California v. Billy Greenwood and Dyanne Van Houten was about a suspecting of selling and using drugs in Mr. Greenwood house a narcotic officer told the man to bring her the trash bag which Greenwood had placed out the street for pick up, but as the officer search the bags she found drug paraphernalia which was used as evidence to convict Mr. Greenwood but the lower court revoked it because she search the trash bag without a warrant and that was a violation of the fourth amendment. but the trash bags was placed on the street were any child or animal can unseal it so he could not argue about his privacy if it was out in the police for anything or any person to expose the content of the bags but the court stated “ the police cannot reasonably be expected to avert their eyes from evidence of criminal activity that could have been observed by any member of the public “ this means

Read More
234 Words | 1 Pages

Auburn Police Records department checked Oleg 's criminal history for prior order violations and it showed Oleg had two guilty convictions for order violations. Because Oleg had two guilty convictions for order violations, there was probable cause to arrest Oleg for Felony Violation of a DV Protection Order. I completed a Superform for Oleg. I included the form in the case jacket, copied it to the V:drive and faxed a copy to SCORE jail. Officer Lewis transported Oleg to SCORE jail to be

Read More
584 Words | 3 Pages

The police violated Wolf’s rights and since there was no warrant for arrest or warrant to search his office the police was trespassing. The police officer who violated his rights was to be punished by his superiors. The judges decided that using such evidence goes completely against the Fourth Amendment which is a basic need to our freedom. States should follow this law but are not directly forced to. States using evidence that should be excluded in their “statute becomes a form, and its protection an illusion,”(Wolf v Colorado, 1949).

Read More
571 Words | 3 Pages

Every citizen of the United States has their own person right that protects from the governments abusive power. The Bill of Rights was established to ensure the safety of American citizens but not just American citizens some rights are universal for anyone else. Regardless of the Bill of Rights Law enforcement has violated our rights. The constitutional issue has uplifted and many Americans are outraged. Law enforcement should have not have the right to violate people’s rights even though they need to ensure the welfare of all American citizens.

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

According to the Fourth Amendment, people have the right to be secure in their private property, and may only be searched with probable cause. However, in a recent case, this right was violated by the government. An Oregon citizen, with the initials of DLK, was suspected of growing marijuana in his home. The federal government used a thermal imager to scan his home, and were later given a warrant to physically search his home. However, many remain divided over whether or not this scan was constitutional, as there was no warrant at the time of the scan.

Read More
577 Words | 3 Pages

Sixth, McMurphy lacks remorse; for example, he does not care if it disturbs the other patients' schedule because he wanted to watch the world series. He was always rationalizing when he mistreats or hurts someone; for example, when he raped the girl apparently, she wanted it (American Psychiatric Association 659). The Patient’s Bill of Rights under Wyatt v. Stickney, the following patients’ rights were violated in the movie.

Read More
890 Words | 4 Pages

The problem arose when the police officers said they had not advised Miranda of his right to an attorney. Miranda’s lawyer was concerned that his Sixth Amendment Right had been violated. This case was noticed by the ACLU and was taken to the Supreme Court. This case raised issues within the Supreme Court on the rights of Criminal Defendants.

Read More
873 Words | 4 Pages

I’m not liking the way cops are doing their job these days. They think they can say this, and say that and case closed. Case unfinished, and case is unfinished. You also need to be looking for clues to help

Read More
282 Words | 2 Pages

Being arrested is an overwhelming experience, one which compels many people to try to cooperate with police and prosecutors. Unfortunately, this is often a mistake, and will rarely work in your favor. According to The Law Offices of Kathleen Kentish Lucero, experienced Hilo criminal defense lawyers, your actions following your arrest can have a significant impact on the outcome of your case. If you've been arrested, these skilled defense lawyers recommend that you: Refuse To Answer Questions: Any police officer conducting an interview has already made a determination about your guilt and will only be working towards that end. Even if you are innocent, you should never engage with the police regarding the allegations against you without an

Read More

More about Cornie V. Arnie Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document