Recommended: Essays on The National Crime Victimization Survey
Teri, Alan, and Jee Young are all victims of different types of crimes. They talk about their victimization, either direct or indirect, in detail in the video clips. Teri is an indirect victim of homicide. Alan is a direct victim of assault. Jee Young is an indirect victim of hate crime.
After reading through the information given to me, the benefits and hindrance of using UCR, NIBRS, and NCVS are... The pros of participating in NIBRS (National Incident-Based Reporting System ) is that the NIBRS can provide almost any kind of information of nearly all the major cases such as terrorism, abuse, assault, and etc. The information they produce is detailed, accurate and meaningful than others. Also, they help agencies to work together to find a solution or strategies to the case.
UCR and NIBRS are regulated and watched by the FBI, but NIBRS is watched more carefully considering it goes into much more detail than the uniform crime report does. NCVS (National Crime Victim Survey) had a total of 84% response rate, fairly well considering how many people do not report crimes that happen to them/someone else. According to the NIBRS official website, from 1980-2014, the year between 2005-2010 had the biggest number of people either in jail, prison, or on parole. As of right now, it is slowly decreasing back down.
The better of the two systems by far is National Incident-Based Reporting System or NIBRS, and basically, it offers much more detail, and for the state (MD) means collecting more quantifiable data. Under NIBRS, each offense incident is reported instead of using summaries as with Uniform Crime Reporting standards. NIBRS includes many more individual elements about events not covered with UCR. Besides, more crimes are reported in NIBRS and cover 49 'Group A ' offenses (Crime Against Person, Crime Against Property, or Crime Against Society).
One of these being the Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Survey, which is filled out by most police departments and divisions. Yet, this survey only records information about the crime, and nothing about race. Another police record is the Uniform Crime Reporting Incident-based Survey (UCR-2). Similar to the UCR, this survey also records information on the crime and the parties involved in committing the offence. In addition, the UCR-2 records social characteristics of victims, age and gender, relationship between the offender and victim, and date of birth.
Contrast the UCR/NIBRS with the NCVS The Uniform Crime Report (UCR) has been administered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) since 1930 and has grown tremendously over the years. The UCR now includes data from city, county, state, and federal law enforcement agencies from across the United States. In its infancy, the UCR constructed a Crime Index that “summed the occurrences of seven major offenses, including murder, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft—and expressed the results as a crime rate based on population” (Schmalleger, 2009) with arson being added to the list during 1979. However, due to skewed data the Crime Index was officially take out of use in the UCR/NIBRS program during 2004.
The data cited was collected by National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). This is a tool that the federal government utilizes annually by obtaining information through methodologies similar to a census. According to the BJS website, the NCVS is conducted annually from “a nationally representative sample of about 90,000 households, comprising nearly 160,000 persons, on the frequency,
This viewpoint displays unbiased measures, it demonstrates what society believes is criminal as well as values, and it has since become more detailed and informative due to an increase in agencies providing data (Morden & Palys, 2015). Using this perspective, the UCR seems to be unbiased but because it only has data that is recorded by the police, it is not all that fair. Police officers do not record all reports that are reported and if it is not recorded, then it is not reflected in the UCR. This is an issue in the UCR, and in some part, Statistics Canada for not having the most accurate data being collected and presented to the public. As a result, there are many crimes that also go unreported and is also not reflected in the UCR or in statistics.
Relation In the book Glass Castle, by Jeannette Walls, it was never said in the writing that the mother had a type of mental illness. Though throughout this book it was never said in writing that she has mental illness like depression, but it was hinted at. She was showing symptoms of depression throughout the story, as her own and her family's life and way living got worse she seemed to care less and spend more time in bed, not wanting to get out as if she was physically . Her kids all said this was her mother just being selfish and lazy.
The UCR may indeed be based on crimes reported by the police but those reports are lower than the actual number of crimes committed due to the dark figure of crime and the dark figure of recording, making the UCR subjective to the officer’s interpretation of crimes. However, the General Social Survey is based off the public’s perception of their own victimization
Specifically, it refers to narrower range of crimes considered by the Survey. It does not pay attention to such aspects, as homicide, commercial crimes, victimization of children under 12 years old and arsons. It is apparent, that despite otherness of the survey’s purposes, analysis of those issues are desirable for a broad picture of the US crime rates. The next disadvantage of the National Crime Victimization Survey may be seen in absence of updates since the year of 1993.
The methods for measuring and reporting crime are essential not only for law enforcement but also for the general public. The three forms of reporting methods are UCR, NIBRS, and NCVS. These reports can show us whether the crime rates are dropping or continuing to grow. UCR is the Uniform Crime Report. This report serves to show a reliable group of criminal justice statistics for law enforcement.
Contrary to the common belief, crime has been on the decline for the past three decades. Yet, news and media have been covering crime more than ever, resulting in the public belief that crime is at an all time high. The sharp drop in crime since the early 1990s has left experts curious to discover the reasons for the decrease in crime. As I compare the article Understanding Why Crime Fell in the 1990s: Four Factors that Explain the Decline and Six that Do Not by Steven D. Levitt and the article Evaluating Contemporary Crime Drop(s) in America, New York City, and Many Other Places by Eric P. Baumer and Kevin T. Wolff, I will briefly describe the articles, compare their agreements and disagreements, as well as discuss my personal preferences.
There are various measurement tools and surveys used to capture delinquency. These tools depict a certain extent of crime due to multiple reasons such as not reporting, over reporting, and omission of certain crimes. All of which significantly impact the statistical data resulting from the collection methods used by the government. Some of these methods include Uniform Crime Report (UCR), National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS), National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) and self-report surveys. Every report has a distinct process and the type of information collected within, however, each method attempts to present the most accurate data.
Audience labour Introduction The Canadian scholar Dallas. W. Smythe presented the audience commodity theory in his book Communications: Blindspot of Western Marxism (1977). The demand of advertised goods is created by audience labour, and this is the purposes of monopoly capitalism advertisers. Time away from work, but not asleep is sold as a commodity to advertisers.
