ipl-logo

Victims Of Crimes: Teri, Alan, And Jee Young

2047 Words9 Pages

Teri, Alan, and Jee Young are all victims of different types of crimes. They talk about their victimization, either direct or indirect, in detail in the video clips. Teri is an indirect victim of homicide. Alan is a direct victim of assault. Jee Young is an indirect victim of hate crime. Even though some victims may be indirect victims, the crime still has a significant effect on them. All three of these crimes have shown to be detrimental for each victim and his family. Teri was a mother of a sixteen-year-old boy, Anthony. Anthony was part of a gang; which Teri was not aware of. The gang members murdered Anthony and left him inside a trash can. When Teri was shown Anthony’s dead body, she could barely recognize him. The only way she was able to recognize him was through his fingernails due to Anthony’s finger biting habit (Teri, OVCTTAC, Victim Impact Video). Teri believes her son wanted to live, and believes that what occurred to him was not fair. This belief of injustice stems from the Just World Theory. The theory assumes that the world is good, that events in the world have some kind of meaning, and that good people who make good …show more content…

His support system was not present, which definitely had an impact on the way that Alan reacted to the event (Alan, OVCTTAC, Victim Impact Video). Support systems are essential to the recuperation of crime impacted victims (Davis, Lurigio, Herman). Nonetheless, a woman who owned the property the attack to place in, saw the attack via the security cameras. She chased the assailant away, which prevented the aggressor from inflicting more injuries on Alan. Alan was able to receive some medical assistance, nevertheless, the medical personnel had to send him home after six days due to Alan not having medical insurance. The criminal justice system did not appear to have any response to the assault on Alan (Alan, OVCTTAC, Victim Impact

Open Document