ipl-logo

Criminal Law Vs Burden Of Proof

905 Words4 Pages

A tort actions is a form of civil law, which are intentional tort, torts of negligence, and strict liability torts, the vast majority of legal issues in the United State involve this, such as divorce, child custody, child support, domestic dispute, consumer problems, defamation, and injuries due to a person by another person. You can fine a civil lawsuit yourself or have an attorney do it for you, in this case you become the plaintiff and the other person will be the defendant. Criminal law deals with crimes against society, such as murder, theft, assault, abuse, arson, and embezzlement. You can't initiate a criminal lawsuit yourself, only a federal or state prosecutor can.
One of the most major differences between civil and criminal law is …show more content…

In criminal law, the burden of proof is always on the state. The state must prove that the defendant is guilty. The defendant is assumed to be innocent; the defendant needs to prove nothing. The state must prove that the defendant satisfied each element of the statutory definition of the crime, and the defendant's participation, beyond a reasonable doubt. In case of criminal law, defendant is not declared guilty unless approximately more than 99% proof is against him. Criminal cases almost always allow for a trial by jury. In civil law, the burden of proof is preponderance of the evidence. If the judge or jury believes that more than 50% of the evidence favors the plaintiffs, then plaintiffs win, which is very low as compared to 99% proof for criminal law. Civil cases do allow juries in some instances, but many civil cases will be decided by a …show more content…

In criminal cases, if an act was lawful when it was performed, the performer can not be convicted of a crime as a result of a law enacted after the performance. This law is called the no ex post facto law. Also in criminal cases, defendants are protected against unreasonable searches and seizures which is the fourth amendment. Defendants are also protected against double jeopardy and self-incrimination which is the fifth amendment. Protection from double jeopardy takes two forms. A defendant who is found not guilty of a more serious charge can not have a second trial on a lesser included offense. The prosecution can not appeal a not guilty verdict. Of course, the criminal defendant can appeal a guilty verdict and an incarcerated criminal can file a habeas corpus writ. However, it is possible to try a defendant in criminal court and then try the same defendant again in civil court, for the same event. Defendants have the right to a speedy trial and the right to the assistance of counsel which is the sixth amendment. Indigent defendants have the right to an attorney who is paid by the state, even during custodial questioning by

Open Document