ipl-logo

Crito: The Case Of Socrates And Assata Shakur

616 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Provide the justifications for punishment in modern society

When given the opportunity, should people choose to escape imprisonment or should they welcome death? In the cases of Socrates and Assata Shakur, they were both found guilty of crimes and the law ordered them to die. Socrates felt obligated to obey the law and die but I agree with Assata Shakur’s decision to escape.
In the Crito, Socrates is awaiting execution in prison for impiety and corrupting the youth. His impiety is based off his questioning and disbelieving the traditional gods, and his corrupting and teaching the youth to do the same. Crito arrives at the prison after having arranged a potential escape opportunity for Socrates, and they proceed to debate whether it would be just for Socrates to escape.
Socrates argues that while the …show more content…

In Shakur’s case neither justice was served, as not only was she wrongly convicted but her trial is widely considered unfair by majority of her supporters. In May 1973, Shakur was arrested after being wounded in a shootout on the New Jersey Turnpike that involved New Jersey State Troopers Werner Foerster and James Harper and BLA members Sundiata Acoli and Zayd Malik Shakur. Harper was wounded; Zayd was killed; Foerster was killed by Acoli. Shakur was charged with murder, attempted murder, armed robbery, bank robbery, and kidnapping in relation to the shootout and six other incidents. Under New Jersey's "aiding and abetting" statute, the prosecution did not need to prove that Shakur fired the shots that killed either Foerster or Zayd Shakur. In 1977, she was convicted of the murder of Foerster and seven other felonies related to the shootout, in a trial her supporters argue was unfair. Under New Jersey's "aiding and abetting" statute, the prosecution did not need to prove that Shakur fired the shots that killed either Foerster or Zayd Shakur. In my opinion, the ultimate goal in justice is actually achieving justice and that we establish procedures that we think will achieve justice. When those procedures fail to do so, we are obligated to alter or override the

Show More
Related

Euthyphro And The Crito Analysis

529 Words | 3 Pages

By questioning holiness, gods, piety, impiety and justice, Socrates questioned the authority, the choices it made, and the principals it followed. Unlike in The Euthyphro, in The Crito, Socrates defended the law and authorities. The debate took place in jail where Socrates was waiting for his execution. Crito, his friend, came to visit and tried to persuade Socrates to escape.

Read More

Biography Of Assata Olugbala Shakur

749 Words | 3 Pages

On December 21, 1971, Shakur was again named a suspect by NYC police in a hand grenade attack that destroyed a police car and slightly injured two police in Queens. A state alarm was issued a couple days after the attack when a witness identified Shakur by photograph. On May 2, 1973 Assata Shakur was stopped on the New Jersey Turnpike in East Brunswick by a State Trooper for driving with a broken tail light. Assata Shakur and her friend were ordered to put their hands on their laps and not to move.

Read More

Why Did Socrates Do Not Escape Crito

233 Words | 1 Pages

Crito was afraid because his friend Socrates was willing to be executed; Crito made haste to explain that he can and must help Socrates to escape. All it would take is a few appropriate bribes to the guards and anyone who was willing to provide meaningful information, which would not be at all difficult to take care of. Crito further explains that if Socrates does not escape, no one would believe that he had willingly faced execution. Instead, Crito would be accused of not helping Socrates, He would rather be accused of being materialistic. Socrates suggests that one should only be cautious of the opinions of sensible people who will see things exactly as they turned out.

Read More

Rhetorical Devices Used In Aristotle's Crito

624 Words | 3 Pages

From beginning to end, Aristotle’s captivating reading, Crito, is composed with of the three rhetorical devices: logos, pathos, and ethos. Consequentialy, one of the existent rhetorical devices is more robust than the others. Whilst logos and pathos spawn well-founded emotional and logical enticement, the most indisputable rhetorical device used throughout the story is ethos. Undoubtably, ethos is the utmost evident rhetorical device in the story, Crito, as Socrates honorably stood by his morals, even after Crito tried to prompt the man to abandon them; demonstrating his thickness of character, integrity, and honesty.

Read More

Assat Vs Socrates Compare And Contrast

991 Words | 4 Pages

Crito is supposedly a friend to Socrates but his words and actions does not speak the same intentions. He tells Socrates that if he will not leave and escape prison, that everyone would think that he didn’t care about his friend well enough to help him. Socrates is not concerned about the opinion of the majority, for it is capable of neither the greatest evil nor the greatest good. Crito then questioned Socrates on many different things and also degraded his name and manhood. Some of the concerns listed by Crito regarded Socrates’ kids, the fact that his friends may be excluded from the Community, and playing into the hands of his enemies and giving aid to the ones who are disregarding the demands of justice.

Read More

Socrates Argument Of Tacit Agreement In The Crito

543 Words | 3 Pages

Position Paper #1: For Socrates’ Argument of Tacit Agreement In The Crito Socrates uses two metaphors to justify his reason for staying in jail and dying instead of leaving Athens and starting a new life in another town. The metaphor he uses that most justifies his reasoning is the argument of tacit agreement, that he agreed to the laws and regulation of Athens when he decided to live there. Socrates knew that living in he agreed to follow all rules that the city had.

Read More

Socrates Argument At 50a-B Of The Crito

1118 Words | 5 Pages

Crito is distressed by Socrates reasoning and wishes to convince him to escape since Crito and friends can provide the ransom that the jury demands. If not for himself, Socrates should escape for the sake of his friends, sons, and those who benefit from his teaching according to Crito. However, Socrates denies the plan of escape. The three arguments to be acknowledged are as follows: the selfish, the practicality, and the moral. Socrates reason not to escape, Socrates explanation of the good life, and an objection for breaking the laws that would put no harm to his fellow citizens is

Read More

Socrates Arguments In The Crito

499 Words | 2 Pages

Socrates’ Arguments in the Crito In The Crito, Socrates argues that he should not escape prison because it would be morally incorrect. He says that the really important thing is not to live but to live well. Therefore, by escaping prison, not only will he suffer the consequences but also his family, his friends, and the city of Athens. Socrates argues that the city of Athens would be affected if he escapes from prison.

Read More

Summary Of Crito's Three Arguments

718 Words | 3 Pages

Crito and others have the money to bribe the informers and wants Socrates to let go of his fears if he has any because it is well worth the risk. (Crito,45a.) Crito believes he will be welcome in cities such as Thessaly where he has friends that

Read More

Socrates Should Stay In Prison Analysis

710 Words | 3 Pages

Socrates should remain in prison after evaluating Critos arguments although Socrates’s were stronger. I’ll begin with Crito’s argument and what makes them strong, and what doesn’t. Next, I’ll focus on Socrates arguments and what makes them good and what makes them weak, mainly his focus that living with a bad soul isn’t worth living when you have a bad soul. Crito gives Socrates three arguments.

Read More

Socrates Should Be Abolished In Plato's Crito

719 Words | 3 Pages

Crito begins with Socrates in prison, where his friend Crito goes to visit him (1). Crito visits Socrates in an attempt to convince him to escape prison since the Athenians sentenced Socrates to death for a crime he did not commit (2). Crito cites many

Read More

Socrates And Crito Argumentative Analysis

1382 Words | 6 Pages

To be just or to be served an injustice and obey, this is the very basis of the philosophical dialogue between Socrates and Crito. The Crito begins as one of Socrates’ wealthy friends, Crito, offers Socrates a path to freedom—to escape from Athens. Through the ensuing dialogue, Socrates examines, as a man who is bound by principles of justice, whether an unjust verdict should be responded to with injustice. In the dialogue between Socrates and Crito, Socrates outlines his main arguments and principles that prevent him from escaping under such circumstances. Socrates is under guard when Crito visits him, thus the plan to escape.

Read More

Analysis Of Socrates: Four Dialogues, By Plato

1595 Words | 7 Pages

It is impious to bring violence to bear against your mother or father; it is much more so to use it against your country.” What we say in reply, Crito, that the laws speak the truth, or not?” (TDS pg 51,52). By breaking the law, Socrates would be disobeying the laws as a citizen, like a child disobeying his parent. By escaping he would have been doing an impious act that would affect his standing with the gods.

Read More

Private Life In Socrates's Apology

1021 Words | 5 Pages

In Apology, Socrates faces possible execution as he stands trial in front of his fellow Athenian men. This jury of men must decide whether Socrates has acted impiously against the gods and if he has corrupted the youth of Athens. Socrates claims in his defense that he wants to live a private life, away from public affairs and teachings in Athens. He instead wants to focus on self-examination and learning truths from those in Athens through inquiry. Socrates argues that "a [man] who really fights for justice must lead a private, not a public, life if [he] is to survive for even a short time" (32a).

Read More

One Of The Important Five Dialogues Of Understanding Crito

1608 Words | 7 Pages

Understanding “Crito” I. Introduction Crito was one of the important five dialogues of Plato about his teacher/character Socrates who underwent trial and death. In this work entitled Crito, Socrates refused the proposal of Crito that escaping into exile than drinking the hemlock would be of better option. This means that the discussion will be on the Socrates as expounded on Crito rather than the historical Socrates. II.

Read More

More about Crito: The Case Of Socrates And Assata Shakur

Related Topics

Open Document