The question that some people have been asking themselves, “Were the results of the crusades more positive or negative? ”From the perspective of many experts, their was nine wars that were fought by Muslims and Christian, was called the Crusades. It is negative because of the events of destruction and the deaths of hundreds of people that some was sent to death for no apparent reason by the fight between Muslims and Christians. The Crusades caused hatred and more violence around the area Muslims and Christians were living in.In this case,many experts of the crusades have been asking themselves the same question every day “Were the results of the crusades more positive or negative? ”Here are some evidence from the text which explains why the …show more content…
This is important because, fighting for the Holy Lands is one of the most dangerous place to be in, asif is was a land full of mind-fields. Most religions stopped trying to conquer the Holy Lands, yet two religions remained, Muslims and Christians. The reason why these two religions fight is because, many people say that the Holy Lands is the holiest city in the world. Document 3 states that,people will kill others and help their king or leader,but most of knights kill for fun or for entertainment.They also do that to be cruel or to vanquish their enemies.Many people joined the crusades. Some people join for wealth and strength, others fought for adventure, estates, commercial opportunities,and lots of people wanted to kill their enemies or kill innocents for sport. Neither Muslim or Christian, religions would fight for freedom, others would kill for the desire for wealth and rewards. Others had to suffer the incident that was said Pope Urban the second sent a message for christians to kill the muslims even though they were innocent. There was nine wars in total and very violent, but Muslims and Christians was not the only reason for fighting for the Holy Lands, they fought for some other reason as