ipl-logo

Cultural Hegemony In Ancient Greece

605 Words3 Pages

Cultural Hegemony: Ancient Greek An Italian Marxist philosopher by the name of Antonio Gramsci, came up with this concept and was known for emphasizing and elaborating the roles of culture and education within Marx's theories of economy, politics, and class. For the ancient Greeks the term “cultural hegemony” is used to describe an alliance in which a state achieves dominant military and political leadership. Cultural hegemony is the philosophic and sociological concept, devised by the Marxist philosopher Antonio Gramsci, created a theory that where one social group has dominance over another social group (the elite over the lowborn). Cultural hegemony is achieved through ideological and cultural means, with the ability of a group of people to hold power over social institutions. Has powerful influence when it comes to the values, norms, ideas, expectations, and behavior of the rest of society. In a historical point of view, cultural and political power in any era has rarely achieved perfect balance. The Cambridge Dictionary defines hegemony as, “the position of being the strongest and most powerful and therefore able to control others” (Cambridge Dictionary). As we seen in our text there was massive amounts with the use of power that the Greeks used not only with each other but surrounding countries as well. In ancient Greece, hegemony was …show more content…

Morris stated in our text about the dispute between the “the mother city and her colonies”, “some of the colonies grew larger and richer” than from where they came. (Morris, 79). The second generation had thrived than the first one. The Peloponnesian War ensued the resettlement of hegemony (domination) in Greece from Athens to Sparta. A war that took place over the span of 50 years. What came out of the Peloponnesian brought wealth, prestige, and power to the

Show More
Related
444 Words | 2 Pages

The historian Thucydides described himself as a wealthy Athenian general whose exile to the Peloponnese allowed him to personally observe, from both the sides of the conflict, a comprehensive account of the Peloponnesian War. Book 1 in Thucydides’ “History of the Peloponnesian War” is dedicated to explaining over fifty years of the events and proceedings that led to the abandonment of the Thirty Year’s Peace and subsequent war. In Book 1 he identifies four main incidents, which I shall refer to as ‘grievances’, regarding the conduct of Athens towards both their Delian members and the Peloponnesian allies. Yet he also mentions what he deems to be a more ‘real’ truth than these four grievances that led to Sparta and the Peloponnese going to

Read More
866 Words | 4 Pages

During the end of World War II, Harry Truman made a significant impact on America and nations worldwide which became remarkable to history. His name was indeed the worthiest name to the 20th century. Any decision that came across Truman to decide, led onto a great path. Without the decision making of Truman, America and nations throughout the world would have fell unto a deeper corrupt society. " America was not built on fear.

Read More
1497 Words | 6 Pages

Greeks had conquered the world, so they exported their way of life. But, there are no kingdoms without a king, and with Alexander’s swift and stunning compromise, his empire would crumble almost as quickly as it was built. 404 BC., a long and bloody 27-years’ war has come to an end. Athens is dominated and destroyed

Read More
143 Words | 1 Pages

The Peloponnesian War reveals much about Greek’s weaknesses and divisions. The rulers of the city-states making up Greece were power-hungry tyrants. During the war, cities in each alliance took advantage of the war to revolt against the great powers, Athens and Sparta. Also, as it says in the text, “Within many of the city-states, oligarchs and democrats waged bloody civil war for control of their governments.” City-states switched allegiances incredibly often, changing to whatever suited their needs.

Read More
564 Words | 3 Pages

A significant conflict in history for Athens is the Peloponnesian War (431–404 BC), which exposed the democratic government system's fundamental flaws, and ultimately led to Athens' downfall and changed the political landscape of the ancient Greek world (Libretexts, 2020). In this essay, I will talk about how Athens' inability to manage the Peloponnesian War contributed to the fall of Athens' democracy. Athens could not effectively handle the Peloponnesian War. First, in my opinion, the fear of Athens' imperialism was the key factor that sparked the conflict, and in spite of its powerful navy and allies, Athens faced significant challenges including internal strife and economic hardship. For example, the Spartan's invasions of Attica and the

Read More
1395 Words | 6 Pages

From the Athenian acropolis to the temples of Thebes, Panhellenism has been prevalent throughout Greece, from the age of heroes to the Ottoman conquest of Greece. Developed naturally, the enduring virtues and ideas acted as a vessel for the ideal western civilization that modern powers accordingly look up to as a template for enlightenment. The basis of Panhellenic development grew from Greek cities’ independence its values derived from it, which can be seen in Homer’s Iliad.

Read More
780 Words | 4 Pages

Mighty empires have forever risen and eventually met their match. Their are those who leave without contribution, but there are a remarkable amount that have shaped our world today. Among these civilizations that left an impact are the Greek and Aztec empires; each from largely different time periods. While both civilizations left astonishing changes to the world, the developments made by Greek thinkers outdue those of the Aztecs when evaluating their creation of a prosperous government, understanding of literature, and enlightened ideas. Ancient Greece civilization also surpasses Aztec empires with art development and scientific findings.

Read More
913 Words | 4 Pages

It is questionable whether or not the declaration for war was provoked out of the desire for the nations to prove themselves or rather due to a lack of agreement between the two empires- Athens and Sparta. The latter is the most accepted ideology because the Second Peloponnesian War had many events which predated it. It began out of spite and power and the desire to prove a nation’s power; moreover, the war began due

Read More
1488 Words | 6 Pages

Athens and Sparta, located between the Aegean and the Ionian Sea, allied with each other in the Greco-Persian war. Due to the advanced and powerful navy of Athens incorporation with the well-built army of Sparta, they gained victory over the Persian Empire. After the victory, Athens gained wealth and dominance over the other Greek societies causing tensions between Sparta. They both share similarities towards their cultural background but had different views in creating an ideal society in addition to their state’s place in the world. Moreover, they differ from the concepts of a well trained or educated society and a well built military, but share similarities in their government format.

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

The Peloponnesian War was a major conflict in Greek history, involving Athens and its allies against Sparta and its allied forces. The war lasted approximately 30 years and had a major impact on Greece's political and social structure. On the other hand, Rome was one of history's most powerful ancient cultures, and its great victories were crucial to its ascent to power. The Romans eventually dominated Greek civilization, and Rome's influence remained to affect Western civilization even after its decline (Morey, 1901). I will discuss the similarities and distinctions between Sparta's aims in the Peloponnesian War and Rome's goals against Italian city-states and the city of Carthage.

Read More
593 Words | 3 Pages

Ancient Greece brought many valuable social, economic, and political foundations to the world. In this task, we will talk about the political sides of archaic Greek poleis. There are five frequent forms of government monarchy, quality, despotism, coven, and republic. To compare these commanding systems, we will probe each form's background and structure. Let's start with monarchy, a form that still impacts and exists in numerous countries, especially the Western.

Read More
334 Words | 2 Pages

A major event in history of international relations is the Peloponnesian War. In 431 BCE, Greek City states Sparta and Athens went to war. According to Athenian general Thucydides the war was caused by changing power within each state. As each city state had strength in different areas of war, such as Athens had a strong navy and Sparta was infamous for their authoritative army the battle was long and gruesome.

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

After Greek forces ultimately defeated and left the Persians at a weak-point, there was a clear winner. There was a clear hegemony in the Greek’s favor, thus diving into their Golden Age. As a result there remained a heavy presence of “extraordinary powers and prestige of the community.” Furthermore, the alliance between the Greeks turned into years of peace to follow. Persians on the other hand were expelled from Europe and furthermore discriminated against by the

Read More
1152 Words | 5 Pages

Great number of polises encircled culture and political life of a state. However, this fact is also often called as one of the main factors which led to decline of Ancient Greece. The thing is that there was no centralized state which could be able to resist some invaders. The whole history of ancient Greece can be takes as the chain of wars for dominance in the region. Polis, which managed to conquer the rest of cities in the area, became the main power which determined further development of a state,

Read More
446 Words | 2 Pages

The most significant result of the Greco-Persian Wars was the preservation of Greek civilization and the subsequent emergence of Athens as a dominant power in the ancient world (Holland, 2006). This conflict, which spanned from 499 to 449 BCE, witnessed a series of battles and campaigns between the Greek city-states and the Persian Empire under the leadership of Darius and Xerxes (Lazenby, 2004). One reason for the significance of this outcome is that the Greek victory halted the expansionist ambitions of the Persian Empire, which had already conquered vast territories in the Near East and Egypt. The Persian invasion of Greece posed a grave threat to the survival of Greek city-states, their democratic ideals, and their cultural achievements. Had the Persians succeeded, it is likely that Greek civilization, including its philosophical, artistic, and political legacy, would have been significantly diminished or lost altogether.

Read More

More about Cultural Hegemony In Ancient Greece

Related Topics

Open Document