Darfur Genocide From Groupthink

Darfur Genocide from Groupthink eyes

“How could we have been so stupid?” President J.F. Kennedy asked following recognizing the failure of the disreputable “Bay of Pigs” invasion in 1961. A psychological phenomenon appeared with the early of 20th century called groupthink theory; that occurs within a group of people, in which the desire for harmony or traditionalism in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome. The term groupthink itself refers to "a manner of thinking that people involve in when they are deeply engaged in a cohesive one group, when the members' motivated for unanimity ignore their stimulus to rationally consider alternative courses of action”(Hart,1991).From the common cases

Irving Janis pioneered the groupthink approach or theory in his classic study Victims of Groupthink in 1972 ; he seeks to determine why groups, often consisting of persons with exceptional talent and intelligence. His key scheme was groups that exhibited groupthink symptoms were more likely to manufacture irrational decision. His original works highlighted an explosion of study into how group biases, pressures, and behaviours affect faction of decision-making.

The main argument of the paper is to prove that the Groupthink is occurred in the Darfur genocide case with evidences and resultant negative consequences of it. The paper will divided into four big sections, the first section will discuss the definition of GT theory and its properties, while the second one will look at the case study Darfur and how to prove it as GT, however the third section will elaborate the negative impact of GT on Sudan and clarify solutions to avoid GT; and the last one will conclude the

Emphasised by the model the antecedent condition of a moderately or highly cohesive group (Box A) cooperates with other structural faults of the organization (Box B-1) and offensive situational context features (Box B-2) to raise the possibility of the groupthink inclination. The groupthink inclination is articulated in the recognizable consequences of the symptoms (Box C). When a group presents the majority of the symptoms of groupthink, one can predict to discover that the group will also show symptoms of defective decision-making (Box D). Defective decision-making generally lowers the possibility of a successful decision outcome (Box E). “The theory expects that when a group is highly or moderately cohesive (Box A), the more of the antecedent conditions located in boxes B-1-2 that are current, the greater the opportunities of defective decision making as a product of the groupthink