ipl-logo

Essay On Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

1075 Words5 Pages

As a trial concludes amongst a New York City courthouse in 12 Angry Men, twelve court-appointed jurors are sent to deliberate the life of an inner-city teen. If found guilty for murder in the first degree, the eighteen-year-old defendant faces a mandatory death sentence. Given the harsh circumstances of the trial, the jurors must decide a unanimous verdict of guilt or innocence (Fonda & Lumet). In the attempt to reach a united decision, the dozen is forced into argumentation. With the heat of summer and debate surrounding the jury room, the men’s attitudes and prejudices begin to toughen. The concept of groupthink severely influences the jury to a deadly conclusion—guilty of capital murder. However, when the eighth juror proposes an alternative idea - the mere possibility of innocence, cooperative argumentation steers the group to a rational decision (Fonda & Lumet). When a group forgoes the acts of analysis and evaluation in order to ensure the harmony and consistency of a group, the phenomenon of groupthink …show more content…

When one brave juror voted 'not guilty' at the beginning of deliberations, he set the foundation for cooperative argumentation (Fonda & Lumet). The eighth juror’s willingness to stand alone was essential in adopting a cooperative nature. To be a minority is never easy. In fact, when an individual stands alone, he or she is opposing the human nature to be liked and accepted. However, through persistent and persuasive appeals, the eighth juror’s sparks the dialogue needed for cooperative argumentation. In order to establish the unanimous verdict needed by the court, the jury must engage in discussion. Offering evidence and logical reasoning and challenging the tenets of groupthink, the architect-turned-leader forces the men to reconsider the questionable foundation and eyewitness testimony of the case (Fonda &

Show More
Related

Block 4 Prejudice Is A Big Problem In Today's Juries

466 Words | 2 Pages

Block 4 Prejudice is a big problem in today’s juries, as it can put an innocent person in jail, or worse. Twelve angry men by Reginald Rose is a great example of what can happen if jurors' minds are poisoned by prejudice and bias. The book is centered around Juror 8 who has the big job of showing a prejudiced jury that a kid who was alleged to have committed premeditated homicide was innocent. Reginald Rose uses the 3rd juror to develop the ideas of prejudice on juries by showing how personal experience can help feed into prejudice heavily, and how.

Read More

Prejudice In Reginald Rose's 12 Angry Men

425 Words | 2 Pages

In Reginald Rose's book "12 Angry Men," the author highlights how prejudice can lead to unfair trials. Rose's play revolves around a murder case in which twelve jurors must decide whether or not the accused is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Throughout the play, Rose presents various arguments and evidence to support his claim that prejudice influences the decision-making process in trials, leading to unfair outcomes. In this essay, I will provide three pieces of evidence from the play to support this claim.

Read More

Prejudice In Twelve Angry Men By Reginald Rose

1024 Words | 5 Pages

When a person is met with the challenge of judging someone's innocence or guilt, it’s hard to do it impartially. Prejudice can be found everywhere- even in a courtroom, as can be seen in the play “Twelve Angry Men,” by Reginald Rose. The play revolves around the jury’s thoughts and decisions regarding a case of first-degree murder committed by a teenager against his father. During the three acts, three specific jurors were very obvious about their prejudices in one way or another and allowed this to effect their judgement: Juror number 3, Juror number 5, and Juror number 10.

Read More

Examples Of Bias In 12 Angry Men

435 Words | 2 Pages

12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose is a primary example of how bias can affect one’s decision-making. As the trial progresses, it is clear to the reader just how much bias can be used as an obstacle to justice. Throughout the course of the play, Reginald Rose illustrates how the prejudice of juror number 10, and the past of juror number 3 prevent them from trying the case logically and unbiasedly. Juror number 10 displays a major bias toward the defendant, which ultimately leads to a preconceived notion.

Read More

Discrimination Used By Reginald Rose: Confronting Bias In Twelve Angry Men

596 Words | 3 Pages

Title: Discrimination Unveiled: Confronting Bias in "Twelve Angry Men" Introduction: Reginald Rose's play "Twelve Angry Men" offers a thought-provoking exploration of discrimination and its corrosive effects on the pursuit of justice. Set within the confines of a jury room, the play presents a riveting examination of twelve jurors grappling with their biases as they deliberate the fate of a young man accused of murder. Through poignant dialogue and powerful quotes, Rose unveils the prevalence of discrimination in society and underscores the importance of confronting these biases. This essay will analyze the instances of discrimination portrayed in the play, shedding light on the destructive consequences of prejudice and the transformative potential of empathy and critical thinking.

Read More

12 Angry Men Rhetorical Analysis

1186 Words | 5 Pages

Twelve Angry Men is in many ways a love letter to the American legal justice system. We find here eleven men, swayed to conclusions by prejudices, past experience, and short-sightedness, challenged by one man who holds himself and his peers to a higher standard of justice, demanding that this marginalized member of society be given his due process. We see the jurors struggle between the two, seemingly conflicting, purposes of a jury, to punish the guilty and to protect the innocent. It proves, however, that the logic of the American trial-by-jury system does work.

Read More

The Influence Of Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

493 Words | 2 Pages

In easy words it means that a group of people can work together to come to good or even bad decision. By doing this it can minimize conflict and can reach a decision with out a lot of fighting. Groupthink made a huge impact in the story. The group of men came together to reach a decision and at first, they all had their own opinion on the case and didn’t really agree with each other till the end of the story. But prejudice and stereotyping has probably started them off with disagreeing at the start.

Read More

12 Angry Men Groupthink Analysis

842 Words | 4 Pages

After viewing the film 12 Angry Men, this movie shows a jury of men trying to decide the verdict in the case of a teenager accused of murdering his father. A simple task for the jury deciding on if the teenager is guilty or not guilty turns into irrational decision-making. The 1957 film is an immense example of how groupthink can

Read More

Leadership In 12 Angry Men

630 Words | 3 Pages

The results of these informal practices only proved that the accused wasn't guilty because the arguments were not valid enough to incriminate him. Leadership did emerge differently from a small group setting because a designated leader should not let a group member overtake his position. So Juror #8 as a initiator should have never tried to take the position of Juror #1. But it was needed for him to do that so that the group could reach into a correct decision. If Juror #8 wouldn't have voiced his opinion then maybe this innocent young men could have been acquitted.

Read More

Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

1535 Words | 7 Pages

Group think According to Janis, who coined the term; groupthink “occurs when a group makes faulty decisions because group pressures lead to a deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment” (1972, p. 9) further group think often leads to a decrease in the mental efficacy perception of reality and moral judgement, as personages find themselves in a group system that seeks high cohesion and unanimity which delimits the motivation of the individual to realistically appraise alternate courses of action (Janis, 1972). A common trait of a collective experiencing this phenomenon, is an inclination to take irrational decision making in addition to members of the group being similar in background and further being insulated from external insight. Comparably the singularity of groupthink is present in the film 12 Angry Men, and appears anecdotally, early on the film, present in the expected unanimous vote of ‘guilty,’ that will send the defendant to the electric chair. Invulnerability Literature surrounding the concept of group think is greatly rooted in the writings of Janis.

Read More

Group Roles In 12 Angry Men

401 Words | 2 Pages

In group work practice, the construct of a group is based on the purpose of the group, the group member’s roles, and the group identified goals/tasks. In the Twelve Anger Men the group’s purpose was to collaborate on a verdict involving a New York youth on trial for murdering his father. The group members consisted of twelve jurymen in which jury number one held the leadership role. However, throughout the movie several group members unofficially took the leadership role in which often happens in groups. For example, Jury number 7 the black man who appeared to be a Muslim in he movie on several instances rudely underestimated the group leaders’ judgment as well as authority.

Read More

12 Angry Men Analysis

814 Words | 4 Pages

‘Twelve Angry Men’ written by Reginald Rose, is based on the story of a jury who have to come together to determine the fate of a young boy accused to have murdered his own father. Initially, eleven of the jurors vote not guilty with one of the juror being uncertain of the evidence put before them. As the men argue over the different pieces of evidence, the insanity begins to make sense and the decision becomes clearer as they vote several other times. Rose creates drama and tension in the jury room, clearly exploring through the many issues of prejudice, integrity and compassion, in gaining true justice towards the accused victim. These aspects have been revealed through three character who are Juror 10, Juror 8 and Juror 3.

Read More

Social Psychology In The Movie Twelve Angry Men

721 Words | 3 Pages

The movie “Twelve Angry Men” illustrates lots of social psychology theories. This stretched and attractive film, characterize a group of jurors who have to decide the innocence or guiltiness of an accused murder. They are simply deliberating the destiny of a Puerto Rican teenaged boy accused of murdering his father. Initially, as the film begins, except the juror Davis (Henry Fonda), all other jurors vote guilty. Progressively, the jurors begin trying to compromise on a point that everybody agree because the decision of the jury has to be unanimous.

Read More

Reinstatement In Criminal Investigations

1555 Words | 7 Pages

One issue investigated has been if there a functional difference between 6- and 12-member juries. Benefits of smaller juries include more equal sharing by the members in the discussion, higher satisfactions of deliberations, and higher levels of group cohesiveness. However, juries of 12 people recalled more evidence accurately and generated a larger number of arguments. They were also more likely to contain member of minorities and hence were more demographically representative of the community than 6-person juries. Research has also been undertaken by psychologists to the study of how beliefs and attitudes of jurors can influence their decision making.

Read More

12 Angry Men Summary

132 Words | 1 Pages

Have you ever been in a situation where you and a group of individuals are trying to make a difficult decision? A decision that could alter another person 's life. Well for the jurors in “Twelve Angry Men” ,by Reginald Rose, they had to do exactly that. All twelve members of the jury had to decide whether a young man would be guilty of manslaughter. All of them were forced to stay in the room until they all agreed on a decision.

Read More

More about Essay On Groupthink In 12 Angry Men

Open Document