ipl-logo

Declaration Of Independence Analysis

545 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Declaration of Independence Document

THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE (Paraphrased) In some cases there will come a time when the people need separate themselves from their country and create a new one. This is an important decision so the causes to which made them seperate needs to be said. All people were created equally, God did not pick one to be more powerful than the other. All people were granted rights that the government can not take away, these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness. The people create the governments and get their power from the governed. If the government stops doing what is best for the people, they have the rights to change and form a new government. Changing the government is nothing to joke about because sometimes things have been the way they are for too long. People can continue to put up with government that isn’t operating correctly. Changes need to be made. It is the duty of the people to make sure that the government is working the way it is intended to. Colonies have faced this for a long time. King George III, of Great Britain made laws and that were not good for his people. To prove let’s show a list of these wrong doings: …show more content…

The Colonies couldn’t have new laws until he approved of them. Once we submitted for approval he ignores them. He put lawmakers in uncomfortable situations so they would agree and do what he said. When he doesn’t like what a Colonies’ legislatures has done, he destroys the legislature and sends the lawmakers home. He has done this time and time again. This leaves the Colonies without a government to protect. He has failed to encourage new people to move here and has refused to open up new areas in the colonies for people to live. He refuses to appoint good judges and once they are appointed he doesn’t give them the power that is needed. He makes judges afraid because he makes them think if they do something he doesn’t like he won’t pay

Show More
Related
501 Words | 3 Pages

Simply because he knew that, without the ability of firm control, the colonies would do as the pleased. Mathers speaks of a "tyrant 3,000 miles away" (Document D) trying to enforce a more strict rule on the colonies. He does this by ordering the Intolerable Acts which only causes the colonies to unify even

Read More
490 Words | 2 Pages

In 1774 he wrote a treatise called the “Considerations on the Nature and Extent of the Legislative Authority of the British Parliament”. In this work he set out a scheme of empire in which the British colonies would have the equivalent of dominion status. He used this treatise to set out a scheme of empire in which the British colonies would have the equivalent of dominion status. One of its paragraphs says "All men are by nature, equal and free. No one has a right to any authority over another without his consent…

Read More
733 Words | 3 Pages

Although the colonies still followed British culture, they also had to follow the rules and laws that King George had previously sent them with, along with the heavy taxes that were being put on them. He felt that since the colonist

Read More
128 Words | 1 Pages

In our Social Studies book it states that the British kept making acts to put the colonists in line. The British made acts like the Quartering Act , (where British soldiers invaded colonists home and forced them to serve them) colonists barely had enough money to support their family and then the British enforce this law. Don’t even get me started on the Counting Act where King George III just had to come in and make some act just so he can put colonists in line. I mean I get that King George III had to pay for the French and Indian war but that just made the colonists angry so then they started to rebel and and then the King made more acts to wallop the

Read More
592 Words | 3 Pages

The King did not fit the role of being powerful above all else. King George III treated the colonist in a cruel, hurtful, and shocking way. In document 7 it states, “A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be a ruler of the free people.” The King treated the American colonist as if they meant nothing to their society or world. Another example of the treatment is, “COME, COME,WE SHALL BE FRIENDS AGAIN FOR ALL THIS.”

Read More
816 Words | 4 Pages

In addition, “A government of our own is our natural right: and when a man seriously reflects on the precariousness of human life, he will become convinced that it is infinitely wiser and safer, to form a constitution of our own in a deliberate manner.” This example presents that the government is the colonists’ right as well, because it is what they are being ruled by. When one thinks about life’s rollercoaster, it is believed that it is smarter and safer to have a formal constitution. This shows that the colonists should have a voice in their government, even though the king’s ideas are

Read More
760 Words | 4 Pages

Over the course of American history, society has dealt with many flaws, and dilemmas. In Source B, it illustrates that Abigail Adams, John’s wife, wanted the Continental Congress to remember the ladies when they write The Declaration of Independence. In Source C, it rationalizes how slaves didn’t have equal rights as white men, and the petition is trying to give their natural rights back. Furthermore, in Source D, a miniseries that depicted John Adams life, given particular the Revolutionary War. This source allows the viewer to visualize the conflicts that the Continental Congress had, with the colonists, and the British.

Read More
1636 Words | 7 Pages

But before the law was put into effect it was already being met with opposition in the colonies. On 28 July 1764 George Wythe and Robert Carter Nicholas, members of the Virginia legislatures standing Correspondence Committee protested it arguing that "the most vital Principle of the British Constitution" was that "no Subjects of the King of great Britain can be justly made subservient to Laws without either their personal Consent, or their Consent by their representatives." . This statement reflected the attitude of many colonists, and the new law fostered “a growing inter-colonial unity and the development of organizations and methods of resistance to ministerial and parliamentary acts. These organizations and methods later played a vital role in the colonies, keeping issues before the public and resisting further encroachments of their rights until such a time as they were to go to war.”

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

During the time period of 1763 to 1776 colonists had a list of grievances with the King George III. The King often created salutary neglect towards the colonists because of the French and Indian war he was battling in and this caused Britain to become more relaxed on the Navigation Acts. Once the French and Indian War which ended in 1763. The King would randomly make decisions for the colonists in their lives for example the King forced many of the colonists to pay taxes for an army to patrol them making sure they would follow the Navigation Acts and other acts in place. Which the colonist did not even want in their country because the army would enforce the king's rules.

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

Secondly, George III often appointed Yes-men to higher office because George III would not tolerate independent thinkers and disposed of them so he could command Parliament. When George III passed the Navigation Act, which forbids settlers from creating outposts west of the Appalachian Mountains, he was met with defiance from the colonists. King George, as a result, became enraged at the colonies and allowed Parliament to tax them because they were British subjects and had earned the wrath of the king. While King George may have become impartial to the colonists, Parliament did not feel this same wrath. The leaders of Parliament had realized that taxing the Colonies would be the only way to uplift the British economy as subjects in Britain were already paying half their earnings to the government.

Read More
535 Words | 3 Pages

This leniency allowed the colonists to experiment with democracy The freedom of self-rule contributed to the formation of a distinctly American identity. The “tyrant three thousand miles away” (Document D) tried to keep a tighter control over the colonies by enacting things like the Sugar Act, and the Stamp Act. Thus quickly backfired as the American colonies began to feel like victims, against the British. Edmond Burke, a supporter of the colonies, noted in 1766 that “…The eternal Barriers of Nature forbid that the colonies should be blended or coalesce into the Mass…of this Kingdom.”

Read More
696 Words | 3 Pages

This was the start of a long journey for the colonist as well as for Britain because the colonists were no longer just following rules, they were thinking for themselves and King George was not happy. Immanuel Kant stated, “Dare to know! Have the courage to use your own understanding” (Shi & Tindall, 2015, p. 98). Not only was Kant a pioneer, others like Isaac Newton, Nicolaus Copernicus, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson and John Locke called for “a government resting on the consent of the governed and respecting the “natural Rights” of all” (Shi & Tindall, 2015, p. 98).

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

I believe that the colonists were justified in revolting against the government. The actions they took were extremely upsetting. The Proclamation of 1763. Doesn’t sound too bad, does it?

Read More
1371 Words | 6 Pages

“That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” (Jefferson, 1776/2014, para. 2). Authority should not reside over individuals, but with them. A heart cannot run a body alone. Likewise, a government does not operate a nation by itself. Individuals help maintain the justice of authority.

Read More
309 Words | 2 Pages

A Horrible Man When you become a doctor you take an oath to help people, but Dr. Mengele wasn’t like other doctors, he was the opposite. He was the one who picked out the people to go to the gas chambers. He also did horrible experiments on his “patients.” They usually died from then and if they didn’t die then he would kill them. Joseph Mengele did many terrible things.

Read More

More about Declaration Of Independence Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document