ipl-logo

Deduction: Highest Form Of Homeland Security Analysis And Why

567 Words3 Pages

Describe the difference between induction and deduction. Which approach to reasoning, in your opinion, is the "highest" form of homeland security analysis and why?
Induction and deduction are two of the most basic forms of logical reasoning that is used in every type of research (Reichertz 2014). Meaning, both of these methods are ways of generating ideas. As human beings, we use both methods when making decisions on a regular basis.
As mentioned above, deduction is a form of logical reasoning. The easiest way to define deduction is as follows; “Deduction is a systematic process whose goal is to draw a valid consequence from a series of premises” (Bara & Bucciarelli 2000, 95). Meaning, this method requires oneself to consider something is …show more content…

This method of logic reasons that there is more semantic information beyond the conclusion. This reasoning also allows for more possibility beyond the circumstances of the conclusion. For example:
Tom was late for practice; he did not have to run extra laps.
John was late for practice; he did not have to run extra laps.
With induction, it leaves out the possibility that Tom and John didn’t have to run extra laps. “Thus, the inductive conclusion does increase the semantic information, although it is not necessarily true” Bara & Bucciarelli 2000, 96). Induction is simply using observations and/or self-experiences to generate a conclusion.
In my opinion, I believe the “highest” form of homeland security analysis is the induction form of logical reasoning. Any kind of annalistic process should thoughtful and thorough. I believe in order to accomplish this, one must make assumptions, or question things beyond a conclusion. Although, this wouldn’t be the ONLY form of homeland security analysis. Depending on the scenario or situation, you have to consider the truth, is well, the truth. For example, last year you got intelligence regarding al Qaeda gathering resources for a weapons cashe. Two weeks from gathering this Intel, al Qaeda attacked a nearby American FOB. A few months pass and once again, you gather Intel stating the same exact facts. This leads you to make an inductive decision, stating al Qaeda is going to do the same

Show More
Related

Psy/315 Week 3

473 Words | 2 Pages

The inductive logic being with specific observation and goes up to a generalization while deductive being with the generalization and goes toward a prediction. 5. What is the difference between a null hypothesis and a hypothesis? a. A null hypothesis starts by assuming that the null hypothesis starts by assuming that the hypothesis is fake.

Read More

CRJ 554 Homeland Security Course Summary

692 Words | 3 Pages

This paper summarizes the information presented in this week’s CRJ 554 Homeland Security course. The summary includes the following articles: 7 signs of Terrorism (MSDHS), Policing Terrorism: An Executive’s Guide (Newman & Clark, 2007), Threat and Hazard Identification and Risk Assessment Guide (DHS), and National Response Framework (DHS). The summary correlates to the risk first responders encounter when countering and responding to an international even on U.S. soil. In order to tactically respond to a terrorist event, first responders must understand terrorism and its signs. They must also understand the threat and be able to collect intelligent to be able to have a calculated response to mitigate risk.

Read More

Similarities Between The Most Dangerous Game And High Noon

536 Words | 3 Pages

High Noon and The Most Dangerous game are alike, but also at the same time they have their differences. Will Kane from High Noon and Sanger Rainsford from The Most Dangerous Game are similar characters. A major difference between these two is the plotting, or build up to the story. The themes have some similarities to the the other story. High Noon and The Most Dangerous Game have two similarities and one notable difference.

Read More

Baldridge Criteria For The Homeland Security Assessment Team

783 Words | 4 Pages

As a member of the Homeland Security Assessment Team for our organization, we will attempt to build a program that will allow us to meet the goals of our business plan as well as the needs of our Homeland Security Assessment that we will create from the results of our evaluation of our organization (Fisher, 2004). We will utilize the Baldridge Criteria to combine our two-goal seeking areas of our business plan as well as our Homeland Security Assessment goals that we are identified at the conclusion of our Homeland Security Assessment. When we do our Baldridge Criteria measurements of our organization we will be able to determine the areas of our organization that we are already protected from weaknesses and vulnerabilities; and will be able

Read More

Dylan Roof Research Papers

633 Words | 3 Pages

Using inductive reasoning rather than deductive reasoning will allow the profilers to develop hypotheses which will guide them in the right direction when looking for details about Roof’s life and what led him to commit such a crime. Using the idiographic method to investigate will help them to focus on specific characteristics of Roof’s life that will aid in their investigation, rather than relying on general information about other mass shooters. Lastly, using the actuarial method will allow the investigators to use statistics and facts from other cases to guide them and help them to avoid cognitive bias and arbitrary decisions (Bartol & Bartol,

Read More

2014 Quadrennial Homeland Security Review Paper

1504 Words | 7 Pages

In accordance with the 2014 Quadrennial Homeland Security Review, the terrorist threat is one of the prevailing challenges that pose a significant risk level to the United States as well as to American citizens abroad and many U.S. allies (Department of Homeland Security, 2014). In the United States, the Federal Government assumes the responsibility for leading the efforts that seek to manage the risk level of the terrorist threat. That is why the Federal Government has created the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), whose main mission is to prevent terrorist threats by managing their risk levels (DHS, 2014). Since the terrorist threat is a very complex threat to manage for one entity or agency alone, the DHS is able to accomplish its main mission by working in partnerships with many federal agencies; State, Local, Tribal, and Territorial (SLLTT) Governments; private and public organizations; international partners; and communities all across the United States (DHS, 2014). In all of those partnerships, the Federal Government through the DHS plays a leadership role

Read More

Summary: Chapter 11 Homeland Security

303 Words | 2 Pages

The United States cannot afford another 9/11, so that why increase the intelligence efforts in counterterrorism. The terrorist want to harm the United States by any means necessary by learning and readjusting their post 9/11. 2. How effective are modern measures in hardening critical infrastructure and other potential targets?

Read More

Phi2010 Module 1 Essay

543 Words | 3 Pages

Deduction uses the valid structure of a conclusion support by premises. If the premises are true in its structure, then the conclusion in fact has to be 100% true. Induction uses premises that provide strong evidence but does not make the conclusion 100% true. Abduction is based on evidence at hand we draw an inference to the best explanation.

Read More

Deductive Reasoning Analysis 1 Scenario: Law Enforcement

732 Words | 3 Pages

Deductive reasoning requires individuals to critically analyze information, identify relevant premises, and evaluate the logical connections between them. While deductive reasoning follows a structured approach, individuals should remain open to revising their conclusions in light of new evidence or logical inconsistencies. Cultivating a mindset characterized by curiosity, skepticism, and a commitment to intellectual rigor is essential for applying deductive reasoning effectively. In deductive reasoning, the truthfulness of the premises is essential.

Read More

The Theme Of Survival In Joseph Boyden's Three Day Road

1583 Words | 7 Pages

The Windigo in indigenous mythology is a human who has turned cannibalistic with an insatiable hunger for human flesh. Although the spirit was once human, all sense of morality disappeared within the first bite of their own kind. However, if killing a human being - by any means - is immoral, then the Windigo killers must also become “Windigos” in a psychological sense of the word with their first Windigo kill. In Joseph Boyden’s Three Day Road, the two narratives of Niska and Xavier are written as reflections of one another to portray the thin line of morality between the need for survival and the subsequent shift in identity due to individuals’ beliefs not aligning with their reality. This is explored when the question of survival and addiction

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Homeland Security

315 Words | 2 Pages

Homeland Security has may mean different things to different people, especially in the aftermath of the event of September 11, 2001. Some people see it as a necessary step to help keep Americans safe while others see it as a way for different levels of government to possibly infringe on American civil rights. With changes in technology, terrorist use cutting edge techniques to recruit as well as try to cause violent harm against United States citizens. “As various countries and groups continue to modernize and employ modern-day information technology, combined with the infrastructure for the movement of people and resources, America has become more vulnerable to attacks on its own soil” (Oliver, 2007 p. 100). With the need for balancing

Read More

Deductive Reasoning In All Wasps Have Stingers

670 Words | 3 Pages

It is sometimes said that deduction is the process of reasoning from general rules to other general rules or reasoning from general rules to particular cases and that induction is the process of building a general rule from many particular cases. Explain. Deductive reasoning is a process in which a conclusion is based on the concordance of multiple premises that are generally presumed to be true. It draws specific conclusions from general principles or premises. A premise is a previous statement or proposition from which another is inferred or follows as a conclusion.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Security Agencies

539 Words | 3 Pages

Since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, security in the United States has been significantly increased to prevent future terrorist attacks (Hayden, 2014). However, terrorist organizations have become decentralized and that has created many challenges for security agencies, particularly those agencies that make up the intelligence community (IC). The IC faces many challenges every day when they navigate the complex legal system in place to protect the privacy and civil rights of American citizens. The American people expects that the IC collects all of its information legally and that the information and intelligence products are shared in accordance with the rules and oversight that the Congress has put in place (Hayden, 2014). When the IC follows the established laws and rules, it helps ensure that the American people will continues to trust the IC.

Read More

Essay On Homeland Security Management

699 Words | 3 Pages

Homeland security is responsible for preventing terrorist attacks in the United States, reducing the nation’s vulnerability to terrorism, minimizing damage and assisting in the recovery of attacks that occur, ensuring that the overall economic security of the United States is not diminished by efforts, activities, and programs aimed at securing the homeland, and lastly monitoring connections between illegal drug trafficking and terrorism. Cyber security is a growing field that is tasked with preventing damage or prevention the unauthorized use or exploitation of electronic information and communication. Some issues that relate to the Homeland security is that the agency is too large to manage. The reason behind that is because of the vast array of agencies with varying missions related to homeland security.

Read More

Deductive Reasoning In Reasoning

1257 Words | 6 Pages

A good reasoning is a reasoning that leads to certain, true and valid conclusions. There are two kinds of reasoning, inductive and deductive reasoning. Both processes include the process of finding a conclusion from multiple premises although the way of approach may differ. Deductive reasoning uses general premises to make a specific conclusion; inductive reasoning uses specific premises to make a generalized conclusion. The two types of reasoning can be influenced by emotion in a different manner because of their different process to yield a conclusion.

Read More

More about Deduction: Highest Form Of Homeland Security Analysis And Why

Related Topics

Open Document