Technology is often associated with the words “cold,” “unfeeling,” “empty,” and even “soulless.” Machinery is often portrayed as the villain, and that any form of artificial intelligence will eventually turn on us and become killing machines that cant be reasoned with. However, technology is not inherently evil and it cannot make a person do anything he or she does not want to do. Machines themselves are not what contribute to the dehumanization of victims. The individuals who hold the power in whatever society exists at the time are the dehumanizers. The Holocaust, Rwanda genocide, Armenian genocide, as well as the systematic elimination of Native Americans and indigenous peoples all over the world are the most extreme examples of dehumanization. …show more content…
As a result, they also feared the Tutsi and were determined to hold on to their own power. When President Habyarimana’s plane crashed, Hutu extremists assumed it was the Tutsis who shot it down. Immediately, Hutus set out to destroy the entire Tutsi population and seek revenge on the power that had always been deemed the elite (website).
The sinful hearts of the Hutus and the misunderstanding of President Habyarimana’s plane crash resulted in the horrific genocide of the Tutsi. Technology did not have any influence on the actions of the Hutus; it was only used for horrible purposes. Dehumanization can appear in much lesser ways than the examples provided; however, the concept remains the same. Dehumanization is the result of the sinful motives of humans, never technology’s influence.
Technology is only another tool on the belt of criminals seeking to inflict pain and suffering. This category of people takes pleasure from death and destruction, and can never be satisfied. They are extremely scientific about their killing processes. The Nazis are a prime example of this, employing some of the earliest uses of “modern” biological and chemical