ipl-logo

The Pros And Cons Of Genocide

179 Words1 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Tragedy holocaust

Genocide will never be morally permissible. The Hutus were killing the Tutsis because they didn’t like them. You cant just kill off a population or race because you don’t like them. There has been numerous genocides in the world, the most well known is the Holocaust. During the time that the Jewish population in Europe were being killed, Nazis and non-Nazis (supporters) seen nothing wrong with the killings; they thought they were doing something great. The killers didn’t fell any remorse toward the dead. After the Holocaust ended Nazis and supporters were made to watch what they did, when they actually sat back and watched they showed remorse. When you do something bad, such as genocide, you don’t see anything wrong with it. Your morals come
Show More
Related
310 Words | 2 Pages

The question asked was them or us. Them being the Jewish community and us being the German community. The Next genocide written by Timothy Snyder explains it all. The Nazis truly believed they must die so that they can live. The Holocaust to some may just be a detrimental event from the past but it is so much more than that.

Read More
1523 Words | 7 Pages

Source A explains how the killings started with little planning, other began the killings once they were given orders, the only order really was to kill the Tutsi’s and to not stop. This shows how their retaliation and their orders that they were given were not a build up to get back at the Tutsi’s for past years but rather because their President had been killed and they blamed the Tutsi’s. Source D expands on what source A mentioned how just a couple of hours after the assassination, the massacres began, showing how quickly the crash actually triggered the Hutu’s to begin the genocide. Both source an and H speak about how the Hutu’s communicated through radios in order to discuss which Tutsi’s were to be killed and where those Tutsi’s were.

Read More
1023 Words | 5 Pages

This is a form of brainwash and defamation of the Tutsi population. " Each modern case of genocide has been preceded by a propaganda campaign transmitted via mass media-" (Benesch 63). The previously mentioned plans were an essential aspect of the incitement to commit genocide. The Hutu were slowly but consistently given reasons to have animosity towards the Tutsi and eventually it became their reality. Even if the feud had been occurring for hundreds of years, the hate became exponentially worse because of the media.

Read More
921 Words | 4 Pages

If one forgives another person the effects affect different people simultaneously. It affects the one asking for it and it affects the people around you politically. Jean Amery explains, “ Politically, I do not was to hear anything of forgiveness! I believe you that, who have devoted your life to investigation the political realm of Nazi crimes, will understand my position”(108). The law of course justifies the Nazi Holocaust as rightfully wrong, with that said it requires a due process for the Nazi members to adhere for forgiveness from the law.

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

500,000 tutsi and hutu were slaughtered, even worse was the 2.8 million jews that were killed in the holocaust.. Although this extermination was a lot, it was nothing compared to the Holocaust, where roughly nine million people died. What was unique about the Holocaust was that the victim groups were all considered undesirable by Hitler, whereas in the Rwanda genocide, the victim groups often swapped places with the perpetrators. The Rwanda Genocide came to begin in 1896 when Germans began the rule in Rwanda; the people that were mostly killed were Tutsi and Hutu, and in the Holocaust, the Germans mostly killed the Jewish. These two massacres had some similarities, but there are also some differences.

Read More
451 Words | 2 Pages

(document 7) Belgians created the ideas of the Tutsis being the superior race and the Hutus are the inferior race, moreover, the Belgian had ethnic identity cards made to distinguish between the Hutus and the Tutsis. Someone shot the president of Rwanda, Habyarimana ‘s airplane down, this gave an open door to the Hutus to gain control of Rwanda and over the Tutsis. Since there was no president all hell broke loose, Hutu officials corrupted government ran radios and newspapers, they suggested the killing of Tutsis. (Document 8) A group called, Rwandan Patriotic Front founded by Tutsis attacked government forces and defeated radical Hutu in Kigali. More than 3 million migrated to Europe, Canada, the United States, or neighboring countries.

Read More
862 Words | 4 Pages

To understand what is really being asked in forgiveness of Holocaust crimes, I think you have to look at the bigger picture of how

Read More
1932 Words | 8 Pages

The Hutus went through with such heinous, violent acts against the Tutsi because of the hate that was rooted when German and Belgian colonists divided the two ethnic groups and gave the Tutsi power over the native Hutu. Along with this, the Hutu felt the Tutsi had wronged them for centuries before, and the Hutu now controlled the government, creating perfect storm for the events that ensued. But this is more synopsis than a debatable claim Why are you focusing on Rwanda again? The hate between the Hutu and Tutsi was planted far before the genocide took place, allowing for the wounds given to the Hutu, by the Tutsi and the colonists, to fester.

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

There are many different ideas on how genocide in North Korea can be solved, most based on how genocide has been solved in the past. Ideas like sending resources to North Korea, initiating war, and coming to an agreement with the leader of the country. The first idea being to send resources in the country is a possibility. With the technology of today and the vast influence of the United States it would not be hard to provide for this country. However one problem is that North Korea is so cut off and isolated that the leader will not accept any outside help.

Read More
523 Words | 3 Pages

Both groups took innocent lives. Mothers, fathers, and children. Some weren't even the age to know right from wrong. Genocides all (usually) target a specific group of people. They still happen today, if you think about it these two mass murders weren't that long ago.

Read More
778 Words | 4 Pages

According to the University of Minnesota, “During this 100-day period between April and July 1994, nearly one million ethnic Tutsi and moderate Hutu were killed as the international community and UN peacekeepers stood by.” This shows how brutal the Hutus were against the Tutsis. Using these numbers, it averages out to about ten thousand deaths per day. This is like the murder of six million Jews during the Holocaust. As said by Elie Wiesel in the Preface, “That is why everywhere in Russia, in the Ukraine, and in Lithuania, the Einsatzgruppen carried out the Final Solution by turning their machine guns on more than a million Jews, men, women, and children”(viii).

Read More
1115 Words | 5 Pages

These men were not punished or harmed for their inability to execute the killings. In fact, once they transferred out, they were not burdened with the lifetime guilt of killing thousands of innocent people, as were their younger comrades. In Ordinary Men, Browning provides an excellent analysis of showing how a working man from the middle class, can be transformed into a mass murderer through peer pressure and the desire to follow orders of their superiors. The Holocaust was one of the most devastating and brutal massacres in modern history, executed by people who previously lived normal lives.

Read More
899 Words | 4 Pages

GENOCIDE Genocide means any act committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethical, racial or religious group. The word was created by Raphael Lemkin who dedicated his life to make genocide recognized as a crime. There are multiple ways to commit genocide including killing members of the group and deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in a whole or in whole or in part. Genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law. There are essentially 8 stages of genocide, classification, symbolization, dehumanization, organization, polarization, preparation, extermination, and denial.

Read More
301 Words | 2 Pages

The holocaust is an outrageous and disgusting example of human society. It is hard to believe such kind of massacre had occurred or that

Read More
1382 Words | 6 Pages

Genocide, as defined by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, is the mass killing of a people group “with the intent to destroy the existence of the group”. Even though the term was coined in 1944 by Raphael Lemkin, a Polish-Jewish lawyer who yearned for a word to properly describe the atrocities committed against the Jews during World War II, many genocides have taken place previous. One example of a pre-World War II genocide is the Armenian Genocide. The massacre of the Armenian people within the Ottoman Empire was a genocide because it fits within the parameters of the eight stages of genocide.

Read More

More about The Pros And Cons Of Genocide

Related Topics

Open Document