Descartes’ project –the Meditations- was undertaken to provide answers, as opposed to uncertainties. He aimed to establish which of our previous beliefs we can retain and which we should reject as unjustified. During his search for complete truths, Descartes concludes that God exists, primarily because this idea is already within us. God’s existence is crucial in Descartes’ argument because without establishing that God exists, the Meditator (symbolic of not only Descartes but of anyone reading the Meditations and repeating his exercise) cannot be certain of anything bar that he is a “thinking thing” (Descartes, 1998, p.31). Descartes also uses God’s existence to prove there is no deceiver, as God would not allow this (Descartes, 1998, p.44). However, I will argue that Descartes is in fact not entitled to use God’s existence in such a way, mainly because his argument is flawed as it is based on assumption. …show more content…
He argued: Every idea has a cause, and the cause must have as much formal reality as the idea has objective reality (Descartes, 1998, p.35). Formal reality is a property that something possesses simply by existing, whereas objective reality relates to what the idea represents (Chris Lindsay, 2014, p.19). For example, the idea of an infinite being (God) contains more objective reality than the idea of a finite being (humans). He then