ipl-logo

Philosopher's Arguments Against The Devine Command Theory

730 Words3 Pages

Devine command theory The theory, Devine command theory, also known as theological voluntarism is philosophical perspective and view to what Gods will is relevant to determine moral status of some set of entities. The theory holds that morality is Gods command, doing what is morally right is implementing Gods command. In this writing, I aim at giving a characterization of the theory, argue for the theory and against the theory, I will present my own views, arguing for and against the philosopher 's arguments, I 'll evaluate the theory, point out objections to the theory and present approach to respond to the objection. Metaethical and Normative Theological Voluntarism Defined as voluntarism. All human beings believe in the existence of Supreme …show more content…

I stand to agree with the statement, it is not acceptable to anyone to commit a wrong against the other, it is wrong for one to fail to observe ethical principle for not believing in the existence of God. One can affirm to theological voluntarism while being morally skeptic cannot affirm without being morally skeptic. The statement is correct, one can do what is generally expected of morally, he/she can be skeptical or not, but fundamentally should observe moral principles. Normative theological voluntarism and moral skepticism is not a coherent combination of views. The two can exist divergently, for the view of being morally skeptical and believing in normative theological voluntarism or believing in normative theological voluntarism and not being morally skeptical. The theory is consistent with either with the affirmation or with denial of theism and moral skepticism. Taking either positive or negative stand on metaethical theological voluntarism cannot prevent anyone from doing what is morally right. The principle is not for theist only, and or not for only moral non-skeptical, it is for all of us, let us utilizes it for the common good. It can be argued historically that moral concepts equal theological one. Idziak 1979, (pp. 8-10) argues that theological and moral principles are sourced from divine principles. The argument I uphold as true and convincing. There are numerous religions in the word; Encyclopedia

Show More
Related
198 Words | 1 Pages

According to benedict morality depends on each culture behavior, and how society mold

Read More
308 Words | 2 Pages

As stated in the textbook, Think Critical Thinking and Logical Skills For Everyday Life by Judith A Boss, there are two primary forms of moral theories. The first of these two theories are “those that claim that morality is relative” and the second is “those that claim that morality is universal” (Boss, 279). Moral relativists states that there is no universal law or view on what is considered to be morally right and what is morally wrong (Boss 279). In contrast, a universal morality states that there are specific moral values or views that all should follow (Boss, 279). Both of these views are filled with flaws.

Read More
1045 Words | 5 Pages

Theodicy: For example, Augustine here talks about the average individual he states, “By the same token, anyone who perversely loves the goodness of any nature whatsoever, even if he obtains the enjoyment of it, becomes evil in the enjoyment of the good” (p.61). Augustine explains the idea that ultimately it is left to us and our own choices

Read More
573 Words | 3 Pages

Developing from the reasoning of (Russ Shafer-Landau, p.p 13), it is clear that there is a difference between normative ethics and metaethics. Normative ethics are those values that develop from within a personality and are always employed whenever ethics are breached. On the other hand the metaethics is basically the diverse elements that are considered crucial for building positive ethical believes. (Shafer-Landau, p.p 29), also brings forward other moral ethical elements such as the moral error theory, the desire-satisfaction theory, ethical particularism and the doctrine of double effects. All the above elements are crucial for shaping ones ethical perspectives and inclinations leave alone resolving ethical issues within a society.

Read More
1259 Words | 6 Pages

The theological foundation of religion greatly differs between different types of religion as suggested by Mr. Driskell in the class discussion. Thus, some conduct that might be wrong in one religion might well be properly ignored in another,

Read More
424 Words | 2 Pages

Belief in a Supreme High God, who created the world and then withdrew from active participation in it, is common in polytheistic religions around the world. Beyond all minor gods, goddesses, spirits and ancestors, there exists one High God, who created and in some sense still governs the universe. Most believe that this God is too distant and has limited contact with daily operation of human life. Native Americans and Africans have similar concepts of the high god. African and Native American religions recognize the presence of one supreme deity as well as the existence of God in multiple aspects.

Read More
921 Words | 4 Pages

That religion is just for people to feel better about their actions. He states, "In the opinion of religious people, however, the private comfort that religion brings more than compensates for the evil done in its name." He argues that the secular-ethical position is the right position. Basically, this positon is that morality should be defined strictly by logic, facts, intuition, and empathy. This is basically the opposite of religion, which derives everything from a supernatural figure or figures.

Read More
893 Words | 4 Pages

This is so because it becomes difficult to know whether moral goodness is independent of the will of God or if it is as a result of His will. The Euthyphro dilemma offers two intensely differing sides. On one side of the argument, theorists are of the opinion that morality is whatever God wills. This position then brings into question the goodness of God’s will if His command vindicates what is wrong. Arguing that goodness is the determined by God shows that what is rights is so because God wills it to be right.

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

It is imperative we learn to focus on what makes us compatible instead of focusing on acts that ultimately lead to a prolonged cycle of torment and demise. Given these points, lack of consistent beliefs is a grave matter, which without proper acknowledgment has potential to become the deed that inevitably leads to a societal collapse that cannot be

Read More
1363 Words | 6 Pages

The concept of dharma encompasses people’s ethical duties, moral principles, and social responsibilities. This acts as a religious and moral law that controls an individual’s actions. One of the ways one can hold true to their dharma is with the worship of deities. In Christianity, worshipping deities can be seen as worshiping others and false idolatry and is not practiced. Yet in Hinduism, they acknowledge Brahman as the supreme divinity but have a vast pantheon of gods and goddesses that each represent different aspects of the divine, embodying different qualities and powers.

Read More
1218 Words | 5 Pages

The last theory is Aristotle’s virtue ethics which states that we should move from the concern towards good action and to focus on the concern with good character. This paper argues that Aristotle’s virtue ethics is better than the other ethical theories. The divine command theory says that what is morally right and what is morally wrong is determined by God and God alone. People who follow the divine command theory believe that God is the creator of all things, therefore, he must also be the creator of morally right and wrong acts.

Read More
866 Words | 4 Pages

Moral theories are theories that help us distinguish between a right or a wrong action. Adequate moral theories help us understand that what we should or shouldn’t do in certain situations. Two of the most famous moral theories are Utilitarianism and Kantianism. According to Utilitarianism, an action is right if only if it out of all the other action gives out the maximum utility. In oppose to that, Kantianism says that an action is right if and only if, in performing that action, the person does not treat anyone as a mean and treats everyone as an end in itself.

Read More
2813 Words | 12 Pages

It is hard to believe that a religion, which is by definition, ‘the

Read More
886 Words | 4 Pages

If God says you should do something you should do it. It is Meta ethical theory because it focuses on what morality itself is and it is concerned with why things are right and wrong. According to this theory good actions are those that God Commands and the action is morally good because it is ordered according to God’s law and individual is considered to be good if he/she use his/her will in the way that it has been ordered by God. For example Stealing is forbidden in all

Read More
929 Words | 4 Pages

Ethics and Religion The human views on ethics are greatly influenced by certain beliefs, such as religion or philosophical ideas. Philosophy and religion are similar in this sense; they both are morally influential. However, if a person did not have such views, he/she is still capable of having good morals. Though religion is very impacting in many people’s ethical standings, and a majority of human morality is derived from some belief in religion or supported by philosophical reasoning, it is not the only way a person can be moral.

Read More

More about Philosopher's Arguments Against The Devine Command Theory

Related Topics

Open Document