Difference Between Child Labor And The Progressive Movement

741 Words3 Pages

Child labor, its reform, and the progressive movement. Child labor was common throughout the United States, with little or no protection for those children until 1938. Until then, children of young ages were subjected to unfair wages, were deprived of education, and had to endure unsafe work environments. The industrial revolution contributed to child labor becoming more common, which led to changes in United States laws regarding child labor. The Fair Labor Standards Act and the progressive movement are exhibiting the changes and challenges of common practice. The industrial revolution changed child labor from more commonly being practiced at home or on the family’s farm to mines and factories without parental supervision. “Through the first half of the 1800s, child labor was an essential part of the agricultural and handicraft economy of the United States.” (Editors, 2009). Due to the rise in need for workers and the boom in factories, children were ideal. The balance of power between minor children and employers sets child workers at a disadvantage. Children were employed at a cheaper rate while still having to endure long hours, unhealthy conditions, and mistreatment. This also took away children’s opportunities for education. As this became more and more common, there was finally attention brought …show more content…

The progressive movement, which emerged in response to the social and economic challenges not only due to child labor during the industrial revolution, sought to address many issues. Progressives who were advocates for the reform argued that the government had a responsibility to protect the welfare of its citizens, particularly the children, who are the most vulnerable members of society. By advocating for laws such as the Fair Labor Standards Act, as well as regulations that protect children from exploitation in the

More about Difference Between Child Labor And The Progressive Movement