ipl-logo

Difference Between Judicial Branch And Executive Branch

741 Words3 Pages

Since in federalism works in the way where there is an Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branch. The state work just like that as it possess a governor, Georgia General Assembly, and a state court. These branches work similarly, yet they possess differences from their national counterpart. If you were to compare the government you could start by examining the executive branch of the federal and state government. Particularly that of the governor and the president. A huge difference between both positions is that the president is elected with his vice-president, while the governor and his lieutenant governor run separately. The executive power in Georgia can be considered weal, while the president can be pretty powerful. A powerful too that …show more content…

These political figures are seen as the elite and most powerful political figure in their respective jurisdiction. Both positions vetoes can only be override by their respective legislative branch. The governor is the commander- in- chief of the National Guard, while the president is the commander- in-chief of the U.S military. They are the head of law enforcement. In other words they are very similar as they are both chief executives, possess veto power, appointment over executive offices, head of state, and chief politician, there difference include that the governor can develop policy and the president cannot. To qualify to be governor of Georgia as stated by Article V, section I, Paragraph IV of the State Constitution have been citizen of the United States for at least 15 years, legal resident of state for 6 years, 30 years of age by the date of office. To be president you must be a natural born citizen either by soil or by the blood. You must be 35 years of age as stated by Article II, Section 1 of the National …show more content…

This matter can be rather complicated. The founding father were right about the Electoral College to protect from the unjust majority. The national government has the right idea sometime for example legalizing gay marriage in all state, as it was a human right violation denying the LGTB community the right of marriage. They are however violating human rights by allowing the NSA the right to violate our privacy. The state government should toughen up on the national government to protect its residence on what might be an unjust central government. The state of Georgia doesn’t have the best record when it comes to human rights. The state was after all a huge slave state, a prime example of racism, and segregation. Traces of racial prejudice, bigotry, and xenophobia towards the large growth of Asians, Latinos, and undocumented immigrants can still be found. The national government growth in power was necessary at one point. The government intervention was needed to able to abolish slavery, remove segregation, grant women rights, and legalizing gay marriage. The national and state government are necessary to keep both governments in check. In today’s politics the topics range from abortion, gun control, immigration policy, universal tuition, universal healthcare, legalization of marijuana, water control, school testing,

Open Document