ipl-logo

Disadvantages Of Tentative Rulings

523 Words3 Pages

California, USA - January 24th, 2016 – Bench Reporter, the leading legal research and advisory services agency has been creating a searchable database of tentative rulings from the Californian trial courts for almost a decade now. Well-written trials dating as back as 2008 are included in the database for the benefit of attorneys.
In the year 1960, the Los Angeles county Superior court has come up with this unique concept of Tentative rulings. It gave the attorneys an opportunity to understand which party’s argument the judges would support in the immediate hearing, so they can chose not to appear in the court, provided they agree with width judges. Thus, the notion of tentative rulings added an element of efficiency to the motion practise.
Executives at Bench reporter claim that, “these tentative rulings have evolved greatly since then. Today, they are not just “grant or deny” ruling, the hardworking judges …show more content…

It also helps understand what issues in specific cases caught the attention of judges, and helps you gain an insights into the judges handling of a specific case, etc.”
No doubt, studying tentative rulings will help attorneys, and law students gain insights into cases where that they are not very familiar with, while it helps them prepare to counter opposition’s arguments. Despite so many advantages and practical implication of these real time scenarios, Executives at Bench Report reveal that these rulings cannot be cited as authority.”
Operations executive at Bench reporter explain the functioning of the database, and tips to find relevant trials. They explain that the search panel has four sections, Free form search; Judge County; Tags; and Dates. You can look up for a trail with any of the above-mentioned search

Show More
Related

Murder Of Vanessa Pham By Julio Miguel Blanco-Garcia

1235 Words | 5 Pages

After listening to both sides present their case the judge will issue a ruling on the defendant’s

Read More

Ronald Rompilla Vs Jeffrey A Beard Summary

890 Words | 4 Pages

A decision held that under the Sixth Amendment, the defendant’s counsel had not met the standards of reasonable competence required of a defense. Even if a defendant and their family suggested that no mitigating evidence was available, it is required to use reasonable effort in obtaining and reviewing materials that the counsel expects prosecution to use as evidence during sentencing. The reasoning behind this decision argued that Rompella’s trial counsel did not make sensible efforts to examine the files on Rompilla’s prior convictions for rape and assault. The Court stated that the counsel should have known prosecution would present those files to the jury during sentencing, and that the information on Rompilla’s prior conviction would have found mitigating evidence about his mental health, childhood, and alcoholism that could have been used for a proper

Read More

Annotated Bibliography: Jonbenét Ramsey Murder Case

1134 Words | 5 Pages

With this information, the authors argue their point thoroughly to get all the known facts across. The tone of the text gives a sense of legitimacy. The authors’ use of containing their information in one article helps to get their point across without missing any crucial points. “When word leaked that prosecutors dismissed the jury's five alternate members over the winter, many people in Boulder took it as a sure sign that the proceedings were nearing an end--and that arrests were

Read More

Segal And Spaeth's Argument Analysis

1314 Words | 6 Pages

In regards to the detailed studies of both Segal and Spaeth, and Brenan and Stier, valid points had been made for both sides of the argument. The question posed is rather or not stare decisis still exist in the courts rulings today. Segal and Spaeth analyze the rulings of dissenting judges of landmark cases since the start of the Warren Court while excluding cases with unanimous decisions and cases without progeny within the legal period. The areas of which they dissected and constructed the particular datasets for analyzing is superb as it specifically narrows down the specific information there looking for within their results. The findings from there assessments concluded that precedent did not play a overwhelming role in the sub sequential

Read More

Annotated Bibliography: Texas School Finance Ruling

2126 Words | 9 Pages

At the time of this article the court had not made its decision yet, but the hope was that the court would rule in favor of the districts that filed the lawsuit. The most difficult part of this lawsuit is finding enough hard evidence that

Read More

Compare And Contrast 1989 Texas Vs Eichman

1518 Words | 7 Pages

To begin with, in the judicial system, there is an ongoing dispute over what compromises the proper amount of judicial power. This lack of agreement concerning policymaking power of the Courts is bestowed within the discussion between judicial activism and judicial restraint. In general, these two philosophies represent the conflicting approaches taken by judges in their task of interpretation. Consequently, the Court’s decision could be framed in terms of activism or restraint by either changing or upholding public policy.

Read More

Racial Profiling Case: The Lloyd Rayney Case

852 Words | 4 Pages

On the 14th of October 2011, Mr Rayney had submitted an application for a trial which only involved a judge without a jury present. This was due Mr. Rayney assuming that a strong bias had been manifested pre-trial as a result of the subjective publicity revolving around the death of his wife, Corryn(The Conversation, 2012). Therefore, the jury and any member of the public would already have preconceived views in favour of Mr Rayney being guilty of murdering his wife. The trial was successful for Mr Rayney where he was acquitted of murdering his wife. Similarly, this issue is somewhat common as it had also occurred in the case Evans v The State of Western Australia [2011] WASCA 182, in which both appellants had made appeals after being convicted for murder.

Read More

Essay On The Pros And Cons Of Pre-Trail Release

891 Words | 4 Pages

Although it’s been shown that some judges are bias when it comes to pre-trail release to some

Read More

Process Essay: Florida's Judicial Selection Process

1633 Words | 7 Pages

This essay, will go over the selection process of both the Florida and New York judicial selection process, it will also compare and contrast their selection procedures will be scrutinized plus and include personal views on the best selection procedure between the two. The law consists of the trial court and appellate court which are the two main functional categories; the

Read More

California Supreme Court Case Study

211 Words | 1 Pages

In November 1978, Proposition 7 passed in California which created automatic appeals on death penalty cases, “cases in which the death penalty has been decreed are automatically reviewed by the California Supreme Court” (par. 19.). The automatic review created a system where every death sentence would be reviewed by the California Supreme Court. This is one cause of court delays in the appeal process. Scott Howe is a researcher at Chapman University School of law who investigated the severe backlog of cases to be heard by the courts. Howe observed that “death sentences have been generated in the trial courts at a much greater rate than they have been resolved on direct appeal” (1452).

Read More

Montejo Vs Louisiana

2786 Words | 12 Pages

This holding postulated that once criminal proceedings have started, the government is forbidden from bypassing the defendant’s lawyer and attempting to instigate statements from the defendant. An outcome of this case was the Massiah rule, which applied to testimonial evidence obtained by police from a defendant after charges have been arraigned; the rule stated that certain events that trigger Sixth Amendment safeguards are, firstly, the beginning of criminal proceedings and, secondly, the deliberate instigation of statements from the accused by state proxies. Thanks to the Massiah rule, Americans can rest assured that reasonable safeguards have been put in place in

Read More

Bias In The Court System

726 Words | 3 Pages

For example, an individual may connect to the person on trial by race, gender, ethnicity or commonality between the defendant and someone from their personal life. May also occur with events and situations being discussed on trial. Author Veronica Roth stated that “no matter how smart, people usually see what they 're already looking for, that 's all”, and this applies to the justice system in the sense that looking past the biases is and always will be difficult because one tends to ignore evidences because of overwhelming emotions from bias (Roth). It is ideal to have impartial jurors whom will seek to be fair and will endeavor to correct potential bias in the courtroom in themselves, but it is not logical.

Read More

Judicial Presidents: Two Positive Of Judicial Presidents

814 Words | 4 Pages

Example (R v Allen) (1872)

Read More

Essay On Judicial Selection

801 Words | 4 Pages

Judicial selection is an intriguing topic as there are multiple ways that judges take their seat on the bench. The United States Constitution spells out how federal judges are selected and leaves it up to the individual states to establish their means for selecting judges. In federal courts, judges are appointed and it varies between appointment and election for state courts. The purpose of this paper is to examine the differences between appointments and elections (as well as the multiple types of elections) and to give an opinion as to which is the better alternative. Federal judges are appointed by the President of the United States and are confirmed on the advice and consent of the United States Senate.

Read More

Realism Vs Realism Analysis

1082 Words | 5 Pages

One of the studies created by the authors’ was through the degree of agreement and disagreement with each respondent answering the 5-point Likert response set. Some of the findings were “Most Americans (57.3 percent) agree that judges actually base their decisions on their own personal beliefs….Only 1.9 percent of the sample subscribed to the theory of mechanical jurisprudence in response to all four of the propositions. Most Americans have a fairly realistic view of how Supreme Court Justices make their decisions (54.9 percent endorse one or none of the mechanical jurisprudence positions).” (207)

Read More

More about Disadvantages Of Tentative Rulings

Related Topics

Open Document