ipl-logo

Discuss The Basis Of A Claim For The Recognition Of Native Title Act

1383 Words6 Pages

Fundamentals of Built Environment Law
Assignment 1

Jeet Bhattad
871985

Q.1
The law recognizes that the conduct of a person intentional or otherwise towards another can sometimes lead to legal consequences creating rights and obligations.
One breach of this area of civil law is known as the Law of Torts. There are a number of different torts of which you are to name and discuss three of them one of which is to include “Negligence”.
With regards “negligence” you are to discuss how it would impact on a building site and to whom in relation to the Construction Industry would be involved that may lead to a Tortious action and what level of the duty of care is required by such people. Your answer should include reference to Architects, …show more content…

Q.2
The High Court of Australia in the celebrated case of Mabo v State of Queensland (No 2) (1992) decided that native title is recognised at common law and that indigenous inhabitants have rights to traditional lands.
i. Discuss what Native Title is. ii. Discuss the basis of a claim for the recognition of Native Title pursuant to Section 223 of the Native Title Act.

 i. In Australia, the aboriginal title is referred to as native title by the common law.
“The recognition by Australian law that indigenous people have rights and interests to their land that come from their traditional laws and customs.” It is stated in Nntt.gov.au 19th December 2007, ‘Exactly what is native title? – What is native title? – National native title tribunal’.

 ii. The basis of claim for the recognition of native title pursuant to section 223 of the native title act;
• Common law rights and interests;
It basically means the group or individual rights and interests of aboriginal people or Torres Strait Islanders in relation to land and waters, where; these rights are under hold of their traditional laws and customs observed by the aboriginal people or Torres Strait Islanders. They have connection to the land and waters with those laws. Common law of Australia recognizes these rights and

Show More
Related
788 Words | 4 Pages

Business owners receive shipments of products everyday which have to be stored somewhere before final placement, and when a customer sees the placement but trips and falls, the invitee has violated his own duty to exercise reasonable care for his own safety. Also, because the pallet was not a foreign transitory substance, the analysis is different. (Clark Fountain, 2017) Issue(s) – Was the defendant negligent in taking care and maintaining the walkway in order to accommodate a reasonable and safe condition for the use that it is intended? Rules - Tort Law, Negligence. A land owner has two distinct duties to business invitees: (1) the duty to warn of a latent dangerous condition and (2) the duty to maintain premises in a reasonably safe condition.

Read More
149 Words | 1 Pages

In the 1971 Gove land rights case, Justice Blackburn ruled that Australia was terra nullius prior European settlement. This judgement was challenged for a total of 3 years but all attempts failed. However, on the 20th May 1982, Eddie Koiki Mabo and 4 other Indigenous people began their legal claim for ownership of their traditional lands on the island of Mer in the Torres Strait. The case was later taken to supreme court and after ten years, the case was closed and the government granted the indigenous people of australia their rightful land. Before this, Eddie had been helping his community from a young age.

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

After 10 long years Torres Strait Islander Eddie ‘Koiki’ Mabo has lead indigenous Australians to a victory over the Queensland government. This win this case is a historical moment, as of yesterday, the indigenous Australians have been recognised as the owners of Murray Island. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders are known to have resided in Australia, 40,000 to 60,000 years before the British arrived in 1788. When the British took over they decided to take all the land for themselves even though the indigenous Australians were here first. This court case recognises indigenous Australians unique connection to the land and acknowledges that they have the rights to the land.

Read More
736 Words | 3 Pages

The company failed to ensure that the walls of the excavation be sloped or supported as required by regulation. 3. Why was it “unavailing R. Williams to argue that employees must take greater care to avoid placing themselves in harm’s way”? What role, if any, should employees’ actions have in determining liability under the OSH Act? According to our text, a claim like this misconstrues the purpose of the OSHA safety standards.

Read More
113 Words | 1 Pages

On 3 June 1992 the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in Mabo vs The State of Queensland, ruling that the treatment of the Indigenous property rights based on the principle of terra nullius was wrong and racist towards the Aboriginals. The court ruled that indigenous ownership of land has survived where it has not been extinguished by a valid act of government and where Aboriginal people have maintained traditional law and links with the land. This legal recognition of Indigenous ownership called Native Title. The court ruled that in each case native title must be determined by reference to the traditions and customary law of Indigenous owners of the land.

Read More
938 Words | 4 Pages

The government eventually passed the native title in which stated that the laws and regulation for the courts follows in future claims. This had all happened in 1993. Many non- indigenous people did not understand why Mabo had put so much effort into all this when it was just land. They did not realize the issue that Mabo was stating, butF why would the non-indigenous people see a problem.

Read More
1583 Words | 7 Pages

Here, the Aboriginal Protection Act 1869 (VIC) was made to establish an inclusive scheme of control over the lives of First Australians (Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies, 2014). New South Wales’ equivalent to this was the Aborigines Protection Act 1909 (NSW) which was to provide protection and care of Aboriginal People but rather legislated for the control of their lives. The policies of assimilation directly related to and relied on segregation and protectionism policies. This policy reflected the views of all governmental bodies of Australia, in that they thought it necessary that Aboriginal people were to eventually exercise the equivalent method of living as non-Indigenous Australians and to live as members of a sole community appreciating the same rights and freedoms, accept the same responsibilities, observing similar duties and be predisposed to the same loyalties, hopes and

Read More
888 Words | 4 Pages

The three land rights movement, Native title, Mabo and Wik have an essential importance and significance to the Aboriginal people. The Native title: The Native title is of great importance for the land rights movement and for the Aboriginal Dreaming. The Native title recognises the rights of indigenous people on relation to the areas of land and water belonging to their particular

Read More
974 Words | 4 Pages

His activism and leadership in the land rights movement helped to bring about important changes in Australian law and society, and his legacy continues to inspire Indigenous people around the world. One of Mabo's most significant contributions was his role in the landmark Mabo v Queensland case, which was decided by the High Court of Australia in 1992. This case overturned the legalism of terra nullius, which had been used to justify the dispossession of Indigenous peoples' lands by European colonizers. The court recognized that Indigenous peoples had a pre-existing system of land ownership and that this system had not been extinguished by British colonization. This decision paved the way for the recognition of Indigenous land rights in Australia and helped to establish a legal framework for the negotiation of land rights agreements between Indigenous peoples and the Australian government.

Read More
1127 Words | 5 Pages

This paper will give an overview of the act and how it impacted the Indigenous community into becoming

Read More
783 Words | 4 Pages

This highlights how the acquisition of rights for Aboriginal people was a fractured process as they still faced discrimination in the wake of changes that were meant to work in their favor. Although the Referendum did not increase the rights of Aboriginal people, it is still important in the Aboriginal Rights movement as it created the possibility for the Federation to create laws that could benefit or support Aboriginal

Read More
790 Words | 4 Pages

Since colonisation in 1788 Europeans believed the Aboriginal peoples to be a primitive race with no societal structures in place because their system did not resemble one that was recognizable or fit within it did not resemble a system that was recognizable by white settlers. National identity is believed to be a general concept that referred to a broad set of codes with a shared understanding within a nation, and the sense of belonging that is reinforced through myths, symbols, media activities, and everyday practices (Carter, 2006, p. 7; Van Krieken et al., 2017, pp. 234-244). Australia is now regarded as a diverse country with an identity that has evolved over time and will continue to do so. For Indigenous Australians to conform to this national identity, they had to assimilate and give up their values, beliefs, and cultural rights to become more like white Australia.

Read More
401 Words | 2 Pages

With the prohibition of the Indian Act, it restricted Aboriginal people in order to obtain their rights, due to being unable to obtain a lawyer, which could represent them to order to prosecute the government to gain their rights that were stripped from them, due to being the “Others”. The government in many ways made sure to alienate the Aboriginals in order not have a voice which could be heard and allowed the support of people in order to help them, but the Aboriginals were barbaric people they needed to be civilized, this is where “The government took for itself the power to mould, unilaterally, every aspect of life on the reserve and to create whatever infrastructure it deemed necessary to achieve the desired end — assimilation through

Read More
1190 Words | 5 Pages

Abstract Being an aborigine in a white dominated society is a complicated identity. Australia, one of the white governed nations, also owns many aboriginal tribes. They lived harmonious lives in the early period. But European colonization has made a profound effect on the lives of Aboriginals in Australia, which led to the total demolition of their native culture, identity and history. As a result the new generation Aboriginals have lost their Aboriginal heritage and have been accepted neither by Aboriginals nor by whites.

Read More
695 Words | 3 Pages

Should guns be allowed in the United States? With the increase in school shootings this year many have questioned if guns should be able to be acquired by any U.S civilian. The second amendment which is “The Rights to Bear Arms” was published on December 15, 1791. This amendment allows any U.S citizen who meets the requirements to own a gun to be able to possess any firearm or gun. The Gun Control Act of 1968 disables any person who is under 18, a convicted criminal, someone mentally disabled, or one who was dishonorably discharged (Masters).

Read More

More about Discuss The Basis Of A Claim For The Recognition Of Native Title Act

Related Topics

Open Document