ipl-logo

Distinction In Appellate Courts

867 Words4 Pages

Distinction is between courts of original jurisdiction and courts of appellate, or review, jurisdiction.
Courts having original jurisdiction are courts of the the first instance, or trial courts. Almost every case begins in a trial court. It is in this court that a trial (or a guilty plea) takes place, and the judge imposes a sentence if the defendant is found guilty.
Trial courts are primarily concerned with questions of fact. They are designed to determine what exactly events occurred that are relevant to questions of the defendant's guilt or innocence.
Courts having appellate jurisdiction act as reviewing courts, or appellate courts.
In general, cases can be brought before appellate courts only on appeal by one of the parties in the trial …show more content…

It is important to understand that appellate courts do not determine the defendant's guilt or innocence they only make judgements on questions of procedure. They are concerned with questions of law and normally accept the facts as established by the trial court. The appellate judges will review the manner in which the facts and evidence were provided to the jury and rule on whether errors were made in the process.
The supreme court has original, or trial, jurisdiction only in rare instances. In other words, only rarely does a case originate at the supreme court level. Most of the court's work is as as appellate court. It has appellate authority over cases decided by the U.S. courts of appeals, as well as over some cases decided in the state courts when federal questions are at issue.
There is no absolute right to appeal to the United States supreme court. Although thousands of cases are filed with the supreme court each year, in 2013-2014 the court heard only 75. With a writ of certiorari, the supreme court orders a lower court to send it the record of a case for review. A party can petition the supreme court to issue a writ …show more content…

Although the justices are not required to give their reasons for refusing to hear a case, most often the discretionary decision is based on whether the legal issue involves a “substantial federal question.” Often, such questions arise when lower courts split on a particular issue. Different federal and state courts had produced varying opinions on the question of whether an anonymous tip provides reasonable suspicion for police officers to pull over a driver that the officers do not actually see breaking any traffic laws. To clear up confusion on this question, such stops can lead to warrantless searches the court agreed to consider the matter. In 2014, it ruled that law enforcement agents can stop drivers based on nothing more than a 911 tip phoned in by an anonymous caller. Practical considerations aside, if the justices feel that a case does not address an important federal law or constitutional issue, they will vote to deny the writ of certiorari.
The defense attorney is the lawyer representing the defendant. Most persons charged with crimes have little or no knowledge of criminal procedure. Without assistance, they would be helpless in court. By acting as a staunch advocate for her

Show More
Related
1757 Words | 8 Pages

Role of the Courts Firstly, the coroner’s court investigated the deaths of the accused’s family. The case was then heard in the local court. Due to the fact that the case was an indictable offence, the local court could not finalise the verdict. Therefore, the local court conducted a committal hearing, where the magistrate was to determine whether the prosecution evidence is capable of satisfying a jury, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the accused committed the offence.

Read More
1235 Words | 5 Pages

In a retributive justice system, the state is tasked with bringing Blanco-Garcia to justice. The state will accuse Blanco-Garcia of murdering Vanessa Pham and hold an adversarial trial to determine whether he is guilty of the crime or not. An appointed defense attorney (DA) will represent Blanco-Garcia at trial. Due process demands that the defendant is afforded legal representation to argue matters of law on his behalf as well as to protect the defendant’s other due process rights. Likewise, the state will also be represented by a legal agent, the commonwealth attorney (CA).

Read More
549 Words | 3 Pages

In this case Kyllo v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled against the vitric of the lower courts on a 5 to 4 vote. The questions that need to be answered in this case, in my opinion serve a bigger purpose then the case at hand. The case itself is about a man named Danny Kyllo who was growing marijuana plants inside his home illegally. An officer of the U.S Interior Department got a tip that this man was illegally growing plants inside his home and went to investigate this. Obviously a tip from an unknown is not enough information to get a warrant to search the man’s property.

Read More
1142 Words | 5 Pages

An appeal against conviction is available in cases where the accused has pleaded not guilty and has had a trial in either the Supreme or District Court. The Court of Appeal is a division of the Supreme Court and hears all appeals

Read More
865 Words | 4 Pages

The Court noted that future regulation of pretrial stages with the adoption of police codes and other safeguards of fairness might render a stage not critical and vitiate the constitutional need for counsel. Regarding the case at hand, the Court held that violation of the counsel requirement did not necessitate reversal of the conviction. The conviction could be upheld if the prosecution could show by clear and convincing evidence that the in court identification of Wade as the robber was based on the witnesses ' observations of him during the crime. The Court vacated the decision of the Fifth Circuit and remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

Read More
1149 Words | 5 Pages

Under the Articles, if the first court found the accused guilty they were designated as guilty. The new Judicial branch made it so that the accused could appeal the court and receive a new hearing as many times as they would like. However, one the case got to the Supreme Court, whatever their ruling was is the final decision. This gave the people the right to a fair trial. That way, if they were innocent but deemed guilty, they could appeal and have the chance to be found innocent.

Read More
261 Words | 2 Pages

In Texas, there are two separate high courts: The Supreme Court of Texas and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. Having two separate high courts in Texas is good because make this system more professional. However, these two high court heard different cases. The Supreme Court of Texas is the highest civil and juvenile cases, and it is the final appellate jurisdiction in Texas. In contrast, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals is the highest and the final criminal court in Texas, and the jurisdiction of death penalty cases.

Read More
1181 Words | 5 Pages

Choice of trial court is

Read More
1184 Words | 5 Pages

They do not have any of the traditional tools for lower court judges; instead, they have sanctions. Informal sanctions supplement with formal rules, and avoiding reversals are one of the informal motivations for the lower courts. Lower courts desire to avoid reversal, and do not want to be overturned as there is prestige about having a decision made that is not being constantly reviewed and consequently reversed. The Supreme Court only look at the role of certiorari, and do not look at the certiorari that were not granted, nor at factual decisions.

Read More
1081 Words | 5 Pages

Section 2. Federal courts can decide cases involving federal law, disputes between different states, and disputes between residents of different states. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. All other cases are only heard if on appeal from lower courts. The accused has the right to a trial by jury.

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

Whenever we talk about the Supreme Court of the United States we all know that it is the major court in the country. They listen to cases appealed from lower federal courts or cases appealed from state courts. However, every single state has its own courts and every state has a supreme court. In the case of Texas there are two major courts which are the Supreme Court of Texas that is in-charged of hearing cases for civil matters. And then there is the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals that deal with any criminal matters in Texas.

Read More
1148 Words | 5 Pages

The trial court is where the case is first heard before the judge and the jury. It is where each opposing party to the case gets to present evidence through witnesses, records, and other documentations supporting their claim. As such, the focus of the trial court is on facts presented and the governing law or laws that applies to the case upon which decisions are made to settle the dispute. In contrast, the appellate court is the next step up to the trial court.

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

They will only review cases in which constitutionality or judicial error is brought into question. The defendant has already been given a guilty verdict and so the question of innocence will not be re-evaluated. However, the appeals court may send the case back to the court of original jurisdiction to be retried, at which the defendant may be determined not guilty in a retrial or the charges may be dropped by the prosecution. The top tier of the federal court system is the U.S. Supreme Court. This court is not mandated to hear the appeals of all criminal cases as is the case with the U.S. Court of Appeals.

Read More
517 Words | 3 Pages

The court 's jurisdiction is its authority to hear cases of a particular type. The original jurisdiction is the authority to be the first court to hear a case. The supreme court 's most important work is the Appellate jurisdiction, which is the authority to review cases that have already been heard in lower courts and are appealed to a higher court by a losing party. Nearly all cases that reach the Supreme Court do so after the losing party in lower court asks the court to hear its case. The court issues a Writ of certiorari.

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

This aspect is concerned with the powers that be placing the defendant on trial, and proving that a law had been violated by

Read More

More about Distinction In Appellate Courts

Related Topics

Open Document