ipl-logo

Divine Command Theory Essay

481 Words2 Pages

1. Divine Command Theory states that a morally right action is one that is willed by God. A Non-consequentialist theory is one that asserts the rightness of an action does not depend on its consequences. In this view, God is a divine lawgiver, his laws define morality. DCT qualifies as a non-consequential theory because the balance of good over bad does not matter because if God states an action morally right or wrong, then it is. The major flaw with DCT is that it’s arbitrary, meaning an argument can be interpreted many different ways. In order to mover past DCT, human have been practicing ethics because it forces us to practice logic, reasoning, and autonomy.
2. The clitoral excision procedure involves completely removing the clitoris. The clitoris is the area of sexual arousal and eastern cultures remove this because they believe women should only use intercourse for making babies instead of pleasure. I agree with the statement describing it to be immoral, unethical, or otherwise disturbing. The theory that that will deem this a morally right action is Cultural Relativism. CR states that an action is morally correct as long as the culture or religion as a whole accepts it. This also does not follow the Utilitarian view point because it does not consider the benefits of the many, with everyone considered. Utilitarianism declares the morally right action is one that produces the most favorable balance of good over evil, with everyone considered. As Americans we find this to be an immoral and heinous act because it lacks a sense of Autonomy; making their own decisions, informed consent; giving a person the voluntary choice to say no, I would like to keep that.
3. …show more content…

The Appeal to Ignorance is not having sufficient evidence about an issue, but believing it anyway. A fallacy is described as a faulty but common argument. An example of a structured argument is cheating is immoral.
Premise 1: No one has proven that cheating is

Show More
Related
671 Words | 3 Pages

At the point when religious debate inside the Christian culture turned into a staggering standard, assortments of reconstruction were pervasive in Western Europe. In England, the Protestant Reformation started with the Act of Supremacy in 1534, making Henry VIII the leader of the Anglican Church. The general population of England faced drawbacks under the power of Thomas Cromwell, for the land of the Catholic church was seized and religious communities brought around the legislature. Cromwell, as Henry's Lord Chancellor and leader of the King's Council, started strategies that soon prompted complaints and equipped challenges from his residents. The Pilgrimage of Grace permitted general society to effectively pass on their worries and desires

Read More
215 Words | 1 Pages

Reverend Jonathan Edwards’ “from Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” relies upon pathos to recommit the Puritans. The sermon heavily plays upon the Puritan’s fear. During the sermon, Reverend Jonathan Edwards emphasizes that “there is nothing between [the Puritans] and hell but the air” without God (Edwards 80). Using their fear of hell and god, Reverend Jonathan Edwards compels Puritans to save themselves from eternal wrath by recommiting. However, fear is not the only emotion used.

Read More
549 Words | 3 Pages

In “Sinners in The Hands of an Angry God”, Johnathan Edwards uses fear to create images that help his audience experience the consequences of sinful behavior. He uses imagery and figurative language to persuade his readers. He wants us to get a mental picture of Hell in your head and he wants us to fear the wrath of God. One such image was when Edward wrote, “When men are on god’s hands and they could fall to Hell, natural men are held in the hands of God, over the pit of Hell.” God could let us fall into the eternity of burning flames anytime He wants to.

Read More
603 Words | 3 Pages

Around 1200 B.C.E, Dynasties chose their rulers or emperors by a system called the Mandate of Heaven. Mandate of heaven was a belief that a higher power like the Gods, would select their ruler. The first Chinese ruler to claim his throne came directly from heaven. This is a belief that was built off of chinese traditions of worshiping their ancestors. If the chosen Emperor fails to be kind and rule by the moral standards of the Gods, natural disasters and rebellions would happen and he would eventually be overthrown.

Read More
831 Words | 4 Pages

A fallacy is the use of poor, or invalid, reasoning for the construction of an argument. In other words, it is an argument that makes an error in logic or assumptions that should not have been made. In the formal setting, an argument is two sides presenting their sides argument using logic and deductive reasoning. In the book “Writing Arguments,” authors John Ramage, John Bean, and June Johnson compare several fallacies. The authors describe the straw man fallacy as an argument when a writer constructs a misinterpreted version of an argument that distorts its original meaning and intentions in order to criticizes it as if it were the real argument (401).

Read More
1444 Words | 6 Pages

The Divine Command Theory The Divine Command Theory is an ethical theory that states that God decides what is morally right and what is morally wrong. The theory argues that to be morally good one must do what God says and abstain from doing what God forbids. The question that is going to be discussed in this essay is if The Divine Command Theory provides an acceptable account of what makes an action morally right and others morally wrong.

Read More
766 Words | 4 Pages

Additionally, he might have legal issues in the future. 3. Do you believe that it is ethical

Read More
1634 Words | 7 Pages

Thesis Statement: Origin of Morality Outline A.Universal Ethics 1.Karl Barth, The Command of God 2.Thomas Aquinas, The Natural Law 3.Thomas Hobbes, Natural Law and Natural Right 4.Immanuel Kant, The Categorical Imperative B.Morality and Practical Reason 1.Practical Reason a.Practical Reason and Practical Reasons C.Evolution of Morality 1.What makes Moral Creatures Moral 2.Explaining the Nature of Moral Judgments F. Answering Questions 1. What is the origin of Morality: Religion or Philosophy? 2. What does religion say about morality?

Read More
1218 Words | 5 Pages

The divine command theory, utilitarianism, Kant’s duty defined morality, natural law theory, and Aristotle’s virtue ethics are the five types of ethical theories. The divine command theory states that what is morally right and wrong will be decided by God. Utilitarianism states that “Action “A” is morally right if and only if it produces the greatest amount of overall happiness. Kant’s duty defined morality states that what is important is acting for the sake of producing good consequences, no matter what the act is. Natural law theory states that people should focus on the good and avoid any evil.

Read More
275 Words | 2 Pages

Fallacy is “a reasoning ‘trick’ that an author might use while trying to persuade you to accept a conclusion” (Browne and Keeley, 85). They are known to be tricks or illusions of thoughts. They are often sneaky and seen everywhere specifically in politics, editorials, commercials, or advertisements. There are three common characteristics a critical reader should be suspicious of: reasons that requires inaccurate or incorrect assumptions, diverting a reader by making information seem relevant to the conclusion when it is not, and support of a conclusion that is already proven (Browne and Keeley, 85). Identifying these three characteristics will prevent a critical reader from being influenced.

Read More
1064 Words | 5 Pages

Informal Fallacies Fallacy: Burden of Proof Appeal to Ignorance ("Ad Ignorantiam") Description of Burden of Proof Burden of Proof is a fallacy in which the burden of proof is placed on the wrong side. Another version occurs when a lack of evidence for side A is taken to be evidence for side B in cases in which the burden of proof actually rests on side B. A common name for this is an Appeal to Ignorance. This sort of reasoning typically has the following form: 1. Claim X is presented by side A and the burden of proof actually rests on side B. 2.

Read More
988 Words | 4 Pages

I was raised as a Christian and embraced the faith for many years. During this time, I read the entire Bible, from Genesis to Revelation, rejecting all other religions as bogus, believing that Christianity was the only true pathway to God and salvation. It was while studying at the University of the West Indies that I began to question the rationality of my beliefs. The churches that I had attended were Anglican and Missionary, and the doctrines of many other denominations were alien to me. So I invited Jehovah's Witnesses and Mormons into my home and engaged them in conversations regarding their beliefs, as well as entertaining dialogue with Roman Catholics, Seventh-day Adventists, Pentecostals and others.

Read More
742 Words | 3 Pages

Is it moral wrong? That might be a very subjective topic to discuss because there are many arguments that support both. Many people think it’s the right and others think it’s wrong. That’s why the CI have this other principle about “treat humanity as an end, never as a mean”.

Read More
1018 Words | 5 Pages

Example A skincare salesman who gets to know that the product of Company X that he is selling is actually good for skin at initial stage but causes burns after using it for a few weeks. As a consequentialist he will think about all the pros and cons of selling that product further but will eventually think that I get profit in selling these what happens to the skin of customers is none of my concern all I should do is sell as many products I can and that my role and my duty towards the company. He will think about all the consequences and then take a decision which will give him happiness at the end. Non Consequential Ethical theory

Read More
2393 Words | 10 Pages

Consequentialist theory followers. Consequentialist theory followers focus mostly on the consequences of the decision and the action. The most famous consequentialist theory is Utilitarianism. This theory follows the principle of utility which assumes that the decision is ethical if it maximizes benefits to the society and minimizes harms.

Read More

More about Divine Command Theory Essay

Related Topics

Open Document