According to Slater, the purpose of the experiments were to test the idea of “obedience to authority” (58). While I do see that the experiments appear to have started as a way to test obedience, I think they stopped too early for this to be true. If they had
After he lost his job, his intelligence started to deteriorate and had a high probability of dying. Although the surgery on the mice was successful in the beginning, Algernon later lost the intellect he gained. As Algernon degenerated intellectually, Charlie knew he would become less knowledgeable. Algernon started changing on May 24th according to Burt, who was in charge of the experimental animals. Algernon refuses to run the maze and stopped his consumption of food.
Will we continue to let our own intelligence be flattened by the artificial intelligence we surround ourselves
“Someday thousands of neurosurgeons might be using his technique all over the world.” Even though Charlie regressed they were still a step closer to figuring out what to do to make someone smarter. Science wouldn’t have taken a step forward. “I’m the first dumb person to find something out for science.” It helped them know if the operation plan needed adjustments so that down the road if they were to try to do the operation again they could make changes that wouldn’t make the person regress.
Some people argue that in the story , ¨Flowers for Algernon¨ - a science fiction novel by Daniel Keyes - Charlie should not have gotten the operation . This Operation caused Charlie to become intelligent , but lose it later on . Even though it wasn’t all great , there were actually many positive things about it , even if he didn’t keep his intelligence . For one , Charlie had always wanted to be smart . He may not have stayed smart , but he got to know what it was like , and it was still a good experience .
In the Story “Flowers for Algernon” by Daniel Keyes A thirty year old man named Charlie Gordon is faced with a decision to get an experiment to make him three times smarter. I think that he should not have the test done on him because there could be some risks to it and have a negative impact on him. Therefore I think that Charlie should not have the test done on him. If Charlie Gordon did not have the test done on him then he would not know people were making fun of him.
Charlie was able to find that the effects of of A.I. increase were directly proportional to the rate of decrease, Charlie also could have made improvements in the technique used for artificially increasing intelligence. This quote shows how Charlie could have made an advancement in science. “ I have checked and rechecked my results a dozen times in the hope of finding an error. I am sorry to say the results must stand. Yet for the sake of science, I am grateful for the little bit that I here add to knowledge of the human mind and of the laws governing the artificial increase of human intelligence.”
The study showed that the guards abused their powers that they had gained. Zimbardo had to eventually shutdown the experiment early due to the danger some of the kids faced. Mcleod also reports about the Milgram Experiment that was conducted in 1963. Dr. Milgram wanted to see if somene would intentually hurt somebody if somebody of authority told the to. Both studies show that power and authority can make people evil.
In agreement, the intelligence of our brain is flattening into artificial intelligence and we are heavily rely on it. As pancake, we are becoming less and less dense of our dense cultural inheritance while spreading a search wide
Scientific experiments can have little significance. Others can change lives. In Daniel Keyes’ 1966 novel Flowers for Algernon, Charlie Gordon partakes in an experiment designed to increase his intelligence. However, the experiment ends up failing. In Robert Louis Stevenson’s
Human experimentation can be extensively characterized as anything done to a person to figure out how it will influence him. Its principle target is the procurement of new exploratory information instead of treatment. In the event that a trial is at last advantageous to others or even to the subject himself, this doesn't imply that treatment filled a critical need. Humans have long been used as subjects for a variety of experiments.
The Scorch Trials were specifically formulated to help the human race and bypass the simple cognitive responses of the human brain to make them into a more capable race of humans: “Once these tests are finished… You will be far more capable than any of the people that have devised them. You will be beyond the human race as we know it” (Dashner 287). This foreshadows that there are possibly more tests are to come in the next
On page 371 of the book, it says “Burt, who is in charge of the experimental animals, tells [Charlie] that Algernon is changing. He is less cooperative; he refuses to run the maze anymore; general motivation had decreased. And he hasn’t been eating. Everyone is upset about what this may mean”(Flowers for Algernon). After this result, the doctors knew that their experiment wasn’t ready for the public to see.
Lee Spector uses Darwin’s theory of evolution to argue that Artificial Agents could have an impact on their improvement in the future, since the idea that AI will improve by itself was discussed in the past. He argues that agents that learn, grow or “redesign themselves to some limited extent”[3] best achieve intelligent behavior. Since Intelligent Agents are most likely to know what could improve their performance and just like humans they can detect where their flaws are and where to go to fix them. However, Elizabeth Wilson discusses the need of emotions in AI. She mentions a research in the mid 1990s that argued the importance of Emotional Intelligence (EI) in AI, “cohabitation of affect and artificially has been evident in AI from the very beginning”[4].
