If the scientist is experimenting on animals, and what he is doing doesn’t really have a purpose then we shouldn’t allow the scientist to keep experimenting if he is not trying to cure a bad disease or doing something that will benefit more people besides him. All he is doing is just hurting animals for his own good, because his experiment isn’t really any good for anyone else but he for the reason that he only wants to find out if he could make the perfect human. Dr. Moreau is the perfect example on why we should have a limits on science and on how far we take it, and why there should be a good reason behind why you're doing the science you're doing. Dr. Moreau took his science way too far, he didn’t care about hurting anyone or anything. “The crying sounded even louder out of doors. It was as if all the pain in the world had found a voice.”(26). In this part of the book it just shows that he doesn’t really care if others suffer as long as he accomplishes what he wants. …show more content…
For example usually scientist do experiments to solve a problem, like cancer or bad disease but he is doing it because he wants to see if he can make the perfect human. “Each time I dip a living creature into the bath of burning pain, I say: this time I will burn out all the animal, this time I will make a rational creature of my own.” (59) This just shows how he is not trying to figure something else that will benefit other people but he is doing it so he can make a creature of his own. He shouldn't be putting animals through this if we don’t have to, this is where science has gone too far, there is nothing that is great coming out of this experiment so it's not like he has to do it. The type of pain he puts them through is not fair, because the animals don’t have an option if they could do this or not do this they’re just forced to do