ipl-logo

Dread Scott Case Dbq

1180 Words5 Pages

1.) How did the Dread Scott decision change the political landscape of the United States? How did it gainsay the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the 1850 Compromise? The Dread Scott decision change the political landscape because it impacted on the political party system. It shattered the regional peace and party unity. Republicans now viewed the Court as controlled by the Slave Power. The Southern Democrats are convinced that they could not trust their party’s most popular northern leader. The reputation of the Supreme Court sank to the lowest level in all of American history. The Dread Scott decision contradicted the Missouri compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850 because it said that Congress possessed no power under the Constitution …show more content…

The North had railroad links that would transport their supplies, guns, ammunition, and uniforms from their factories to the frontlines. At the time the North had a population of 22 million people against the 9 million in the South (of whom almost half were slaves.) The North was more industrial and produced 94 percent of the USA’s pig iron and 97 percent of its firearms. The Southern Confederacy hope that France and Britain would come to their aid due to their need of cotton, but these countries had enough cotton supply from their colonial territories and a more significant demand for Northern wheat and corn. The Union had a larger navy, blocking all efforts from the Confederacy to trade with Europe. The North controlled both the shipping and railroad avenues, allowing them to purchase and to get supplies reasonably quickly. Many slaves fled to the Union armies, providing even more manpower. The South squandered their resources early in the war by focusing on conventional offensives instead of non-conventional raids on the Union’s transportation and communication infrastructure. General Lee’s offensive at Gettysburg war had a high cost in casualties, destroying a large part of the Confederate

Show More
Related
160 Words | 1 Pages

I don’t think that the Missouri Compromise dealt with the sectional conflict over slavery. Even with many of the people upset with the compromise congress went ahead and passed it or shove it out of the way. The Missouri Compromise did nothing but intensified the conflict over slavery between the North and the South taking away the grip of the Northern states. Missouri was considered a slave state, making it so the north could outlaw slavery above the 36° 30° line and the south expanded their region of slavery. The Missouri Compromise split the democratic republican alliance which held most of national politics for about twenty years.

Read More
457 Words | 2 Pages

One of the primary reasons why the North gained victory during the Civil War was mainly due to the presence of many industries as well as factories. These industries provided not only funds but also the weapons which include guns. However, unlike the Northern states, the Confederates lacked industries for they primarily dealt with cotton growing, as a result, during the war they lacked advanced ammunition supplies. According to statistics, the Northern states enjoyed approximately 81% of America’s industrial capacity as well as 80% of the capital and bank. Presence of both capital and bank aided in providing the required finances for funding the war; hence, the Northern states were sufficiently well-off to engage in the war and also maintain its troops, war weapons, and food.

Read More
175 Words | 1 Pages

The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.

Read More
817 Words | 4 Pages

The lack of supplies and goods to the south slowly choked the Confederacy to their defeat. The Confederacy’s trade was almost completely cut off. The Confederacy could not get enough supplies to survive (Ketchum 170-171). The Confederacy’s main goal was to break through the Union blockade.

Read More
1826 Words | 8 Pages

There are complex reasons for the occurrence of such a major event, but not a single factor. In fact, although the negative impact of the general, but the decision for the separation of the southern states did not have an indirect or direct role. However, Dred Scott decision for both sides in this country to bridge the differences that do nothing. On the contrary, it gives one of them a complete victory. Worse than that, it weakened the people's sovereignty theory of compromise and pushed the Republicans to a more extreme position, in fact, to accelerate the pace of the country's civil war.

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

The North had an excellent Navy that had the ability to blockade things that were headed to the Southern states. The South desperately needed food, weapons, and ammunition but weren’t able to get their supplies because the North had blockades that stopped the supplies they needed. The North also had gun factories, shipyards, and coal readily available at anytime which puts them at a huge advantage over the South. They had more money and were just more advanced in their industry, which helped them win the civil war.

Read More
925 Words | 4 Pages

The North had a significantly larger population, caused by both the surge in immigrants at the time, as well as the success of business and factories there, creating more jobs. This difference in population meant that the North did not need slavery, and that it supported government ideas that helped business. According to the Congressional Record, in New England and the Middle States, the majority of House votes were cast for the Tariff of 1816, while the majority of the South’s House votes were cast against the tariff (Document 7). These states were clearly in favor of business, while the South who relies on imports and exports, was wholly against it. Because factory jobs were in the North, railroads and steamboats were in vastly more demand in the North than they were in the South, increasing the speed at which a business could move its product, an essential for

Read More
770 Words | 4 Pages

The Union developed several strategies to win the war which focused on further economic polarization of the south. The first strategy was the anaconda strategy which will ensure little bloodshed in the war. Using this strategy, the union blocked all the main ports that the confederate economy relied on. The south relied so much on trade thus anaconda strategy led to blockage of all ports where the ships could not get insurance making the south to export little cotton (Ralph, 2003). The blockage weapon ruined the economy of the south making the cotton crop they were growing

Read More
452 Words | 2 Pages

Between the enlarged Confederacy and the free Northern Territories was the border of the slave States of Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri who remained loyal to the Union although they were sympathetic with the South. Both sides went to war with high hopes of a swift victory. In what 's up to material resources, the North had a clear advantage. 11 States inhabited by nine million people, including slaves, 23 States faced with a population of 22 million. The industrial superiority of the North was even higher than the demographic and provided abundant resources for the manufacture of weapons and ammunition, clothing and other accoutrements.

Read More
489 Words | 2 Pages

The North had many advantages. They beat the South in population they could draw soldiers from. The North had 22 million citizens where the South only had 5.5 million citizens. The North could transport supplies and people faster because of their roads, canals, and railroads. However the South disconnected from itself with barely any railroads and hard to move soldiers and goods from place to place.

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

The War Between the States was one of America’s greatest wars—it was the fight for freedom, but it also impacted the economy. Because of this, America’s labor and transportation systems both took a significant turn during the Civil War, impacting America’s economy forever. In the end, the American Civil War greatly benefitted our transportation system, but devastated the South’s labor force. For a war to be fought strategically well, there first must be a form of simple, yet speedy, transportation. That is where the transcontinental railroad came in.

Read More
338 Words | 2 Pages

This issue threatened disunion and civil war. However, after deliberation, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise. It stated that “in the newly acquired Louisiana Territory, slavery would

Read More
359 Words | 2 Pages

The Dred Scott decision of 1865 consisted of several implications on the status of free blacks in the United States, as well as concept of popular sovereignty, and the future of slavery in America. however, I believe the implications of the Dred Scott decision was for the status of free blacks in the United States due to the impacts it caused and the questions it rose. First of all, Dred Scott was an enslaved African American man from Missouri who moved in with his master Peter Blow, in Illinois, a free state. Dred Scott unsuccessfully fought for his freedom by claiming that being a resident in a free state made him a free man. However, in supreme court it was ruled that because blacks can not be recognized as citizens, they did not have

Read More
466 Words | 2 Pages

The Union had more railroad lines and they had the telegraph system. The telegraph system was a huge advantage for the Union because they could now send messages thousands of miles away in less than a minute. President Abraham Lincoln could now command the Union’s generals in the safety of his own office. The railroad lines gave the Union a big advantage because they could transport resources faster than the Confederate

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

The American Civil War was the war that ended slavery. The civil war was known as one of the bloodiest and deadliest conflicts the United States had ever seen. The loss of life was an estimated amount of 620,000 men. It lasted four years, from April 12, 1861, through May 9, 1865. However, while slavery was a major cause of the American Civil War, there were several other major factors.

Read More

More about Dread Scott Case Dbq

Open Document