ipl-logo

Drug Testing Vs. Blood Analysis

1722 Words7 Pages

According to Robinson and Jones (2000), “drug testing is a key component of drug court programs because it provides readily available and objective information to the judge, other justice system officials, treatment personnel, and caseworkers regarding a participant’s progress in treatment” (p. 1). Therefore, the drug testing process can encompass many different techniques and several different forms of testing, some considered more accurate than others. For instance, one would think that blood testing for illicit substances would be more accurate than urine testing. Although, completing a urinalysis is more cost effective than blood analysis; blood analysis is the most valid form of drug testing. However, the most common form of drug testing …show more content…

15), however, greatly unsuccessful, due to the lack of follow through and inability to provide empirical data on drug use. It was not until the 1960’s when large-scale application of drug testing was initiated by the U.S. Department of Defense to assist in dealing with the military personnel returning from Vietnam. (Robinson & Jones, 2000). As a result, policies would begin to develop to determine cutoff levels, which would establish the level of drug concentration within human beings. Robinson and Jones (2000) indicated that by “the early 1980’s, the criminal justice system also began using drug testing, with a number of Federal, State, and local agencies becoming involved” (p. 1). Consequently, by 1986, President Reagan initiated a drug free workplace policy and the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) began to federally regulate all drug testing, establishing a more consistent standard, categorizing the various drugs into groups and indicating the appropriate cutoff level to decrease false positives and increase the overall validity of the test. Regardless, of this consistency in cutoff levels, there is still an inconsistency in drug testing overall. What is considered positive in the criminal justice system may be considered negative in the workplace …show more content…

Primarily due to the testing, providing qualitative results, and the possibility of the test user’s inexperience, the overall results are subjective. This subjectivity allows for the test user to dispute the results, providing more questions than answers. While immunoassay testing that is confirmed with other forms of laboratory test to include gas liquid chromatography or gas chromatography can not be disputed, since each of those tests provide empirical data that is

Show More
Related
656 Words | 3 Pages

Later at the Daly City Police Station, I conducted Narco Test 7623 Methamphetamine Reagent on three bags of suspected methamphetamine. I had located these bags from the trunk of Dayley's vehicle. During the test, the substance tested presumptive positive for methamphetamine. I also weighed each bag, at which time they had a gross weight of approximately 1.2 grams, 1.2 grams and .8 grams. These baggies were placed in evidence bags and then sealed with heat.

Read More
1502 Words | 7 Pages

(NADCP, n.d.) Drug Courts were created to provide an alternative for non-violent drug offense in order for the courts to reduce substance abuse through rehabilitation and future recidivism possibilities through probation monitoring efforts and treatment facilities and other therapeutic services. Drug courts specialize in specific issues to reach goals of non-violent drug offenders through screening and assessments to evaluate the risk, treatment, and how the offender will respond to the efforts. Drug courts also employ the efforts of monitoring and drug testing through probation, as well as outpatient and

Read More
670 Words | 3 Pages

Due to the fact that drug courts are working to reduce crime, the policies and practices of the US government may have to be changed or strengthened in favor of drug courts. For example, in the Journal Do Drug Courts Work? Getting Inside the Drug Court Black Box (Goldkamp, White, Robinson, 2001), the authors say “Nevertheless, these findings also suggest that variation in drug court out comes may be explained by changes in the operation of the drug court and its ability to deliver the treatment and deterrent effects postulated by the collection of components inside the drug court black box”. This clearly shows that in order for drug courts to work and grow in numbers, changes in policies and procedures that are shown to reduce crime need to be implemented everywhere. Weaknesses that can be found in this summary are that all active drug courts in the US did not respond, which could lead to a very different outcome involving the effectiveness of drug courts as a

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

The United States has been dealing with what people call “The war on drugs” for over three decades. Over the years, drug experimentation has become very popular amongst young, middle class Americans. At first, Marijuana was a very common drug to use but as time went on hardcore drug experimentation became the new “thing”. Although the government did crackdown on major drug dealers, they paid little to no attention to the issue. It wasn 't until Nixon called on The War On Drugs.

Read More
890 Words | 4 Pages

The use of narcotics like cocaine, claimed many lives and earned widespread coverage by media and news. Following this Nancy Reagan began the “War on Drugs”, a campaign to combat pre-existing drug usage and prevent future

Read More
1682 Words | 7 Pages

After analyzing 69 adult Drug Courts, every practice found there was higher recidivism reduction compared to another program (NREPP , 2017, p. 4). Through studies on individual participants, SAMHSA found that “drug courts ‘significantly reduced the incidence of incarceration from a base rate of 50% to roughly 42% for jail, 38% for prison, and 32% for overall incarceration’” (NREPP, 2017, p. 6). Drug Courts save people from getting put in jail and this study shows how it works in keeping them out after completion. Low recidivism percentages are another huge plus to the courts.

Read More
830 Words | 4 Pages

Be that as it may, others view these tests as immoral and should be illegal universally. So much so that there are animal activists who protest against the use of animal testing for cosmetics. Similarly, an organization

Read More
1459 Words | 6 Pages

It may seem a little invasive, but schools are permitted to use drug dogs to sniff out contraband during unannounced, random searches and it becomes a controversial problem for all. The use of drug-sniffing dogs in schools is permitted because students do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the school and school search did not go against the Fourth Amendment, which is the right of people to be secure in their personal spaces houses and papers. While drug dogs are becoming more and more commonplace in our public schools and to maintaining a drug-dog program can cost district estimates $12,000 and $36,000 every year. Drug dog must go through a long period of time of training and drug dogs are not dangerous to people, but instead it protects people. Without reservation, we must know the history background, advantages, and disadvantages of having a drug dog searches.

Read More
1502 Words | 7 Pages

Drug testing individuals is not worth the money in the end because most people will not test positive. Most people tend to forget that most people receiving aid also are taxpayers. In 2010, nearly half the poor mother or near poor mothers were at least working part time (Cunha). If the people receiving aid are paying for the drug tests to they would probably rather keep that money then have it be wasted. Drug testing recipients is a waste of money since the government would be wasting more money on giving the tests then they would be

Read More
1077 Words | 5 Pages

Essentially, the war on drugs has demonstrated to be an exorbitant expense. The federal government in 2002 alone spent $18.822 billion in the form of expenditures such as treatment, prevention, and domestic law enforcement (CSDP, 2007, p. 54). However, given that the drug war has garnered meager results, this investment may be interpreted as a waste of taxpayer dollars. Alternatively, the money that has been allocated to arrest and detain drug offenders may also be a source of contention. CSDP (2007) “Of the 1,846,351 arrests for drug law violations in 2005, 81.7% (1,508,469) were for possession of a controlled substance.

Read More
1175 Words | 5 Pages

That is why the government wants to test only those who were already convicted for drugs. This will help save money by not giving everyone on welfare tests because that would be too expensive for the states to afford. The decision was left to the states on whether they want to start the program, and the taxpayers were able to vote on the issue. There was 18 states that voted for the programs and performed the tests. The other 32 that voted not to have drug test felt confident that the money was going to a good cause and had trust in the

Read More
480 Words | 2 Pages

An employee 's job is to assist with everyday living, keeping the client in the comforts of their own home and away from an assisted living facility. By requesting a drug screen by my employer, is not a violation of my rights, rather information given that secures the rights of others. The world is constantly changing, drug abuse is unfortunately on the rise. If one is interested in a

Read More
811 Words | 4 Pages

There is no need for a specific place or a laboratory for conducting this test as it can be done with a small Saliva Drug

Read More
2306 Words | 10 Pages

This method works best when the quality being measured is unlikely to be influenced by exposure to the test. In other words, there is a question whether any

Read More
1294 Words | 6 Pages

“Drug testing is a bargain, costing about $10-20 per test. If 50% of eligible students are tested on a random basis during the school year, for 1,000 eligible students the cost of the tests is about $5,000 to $10,000 if the school handles collection and about $12,500 if a Third Party Administrator (TPA) is used. A TPA is an outside agency employed by the school to manage the testing processes. Funding may be obtained from grants, private organizations, local businesses, nonprofit foundations, or donations. For a community it is much less expensive to use effective education and prevention techniques.”

Read More

More about Drug Testing Vs. Blood Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document