EEOC V. Sears Roebuck & Co

161 Words1 Pages
Vicki Schultz uses the case of EEOC v. Sears Roebuck & Co. as an example of sex segregation of women in the workplace. In this court case it was found that the employer had not discriminated against women in commission jobs because the EEOC claims “were based on the faulty assumption that female sales applicants were as ‘interested’ as male applicants in commissions sales jobs.”(174) Therefor Schultz suggests “lack of interest” in those commission sales jobs “rests on conventional images of women as ‘feminine’ and nurturing, unsuited for the vicious competition in the male dominated world of.”(174). She then goes on to describe that the “lack of interest” claim can be use in two ways; Conservative and liberal. The conservative view accepts