Two Key Principles of Economics Learning the five key principles of economics provides an understanding of economic analysis. There are many events both in the world and one’s personal life that can benefit from having the ability to perform economic analysis for one’s self to identify good and poor financial decisions. It also allows the consumer to make knowledgeable choices about purchasing power and the value of a dollar. The two principles that this paper will focus on is the principle of voluntary exchange and the real-nominal principle. These two principles are useful in everyday life to assess the impact of the exchange of goods and services. Many laws and reforms are enacted that have an impact on the financial health and well-being …show more content…
George Stigler, a Nobel Laureate in economics wrote about why Americans should have an interest and understanding of economics. He wrote, “The public has chosen to speak and vote on economic problems, so the only open question is how intelligently it speaks and votes” (Stigler, 1970). An economic literate population is beneficial in a democratic society for evaluating the major issues that may be voted upon. Economic savviness is as equally important for everyday household decisions such as buying a house, changing jobs, or how to invest one’s savings for retirement planning. Less than half of graduating high school students have taken a course in economics and rate themselves very low on their understanding of basic economic principles (Walstad, 1998). Learning some basic economic principles such as voluntary exchange and real-nominal principles will prove helpful when making economic choices for one’s self or being a part of the democratic …show more content…
In today’s market, will a dollar buy a cup of coffee? It depends on where one buys their coffee. The value of a dollar is only as good as the purchasing power that it possesses. The real-nominal principle is the economic principle that does not look at money simply on its face value, but considers what can be purchased with a specific dollar amount (O’Sullivan, Sheffrin, and Perez, 2017). One of the benefits of the recent tax reform passed by the legislature gives working family households an additional one thousand dollars per child through the child tax credit starting in the year 2018 (Hassett, 2018). This would equate for an average family of four, two adults and two children, an additional tax benefit of two thousand dollars annually. Health insurance costs rise every year. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), the average health insurance premium increase for 2018, per person under the affordable care act in Oklahoma, increased $200 per month (NCSL, 2017). The increased tax benefit does not pay for even one year of the increased health premium for one member of the family of
Chapter seven focuses on measuring domestic output and national income. It informs on how GDP is measured, on how to figure out Real GDP and nominal GDP. It also discusses what is considered GDP, and what is not. GDP stand for gross domestic output, which its exact definition according to the textbook, is an output as the dollar value of all final goods produced within the borders of a country, usually in a year. This is a monetary measure.
The purpose of this essay is to argue whether "economics is a friend or a foe of ethics". A concept discussed by Norman Bowie, A.K Gavai and Milton Friedman. Before moving into further detail, what is economics and ethics all about? According to the dictionary, "economics is the science that deals with the production, distribution and consumption of goods and services or the material welfare of human kind." Whereas ethics are the "values relating to human conduct, with respect to the rightness and wrongness of certain actions and to the goodness and badness of the motives and ends of such actions".
Samantha Nyborg LEAP Writing 2011-05 September 15, 2014 Critique Draft Megan McArlde is a journalist and blogger who focuses most of her writing on things like finance, government policy, and economics. In her article “The College Bubble,” a magazine article published in Newsweek on September 17, 2012, McArlde writes about how the “Mythomania about college has turned getting a degree into an American neurosis” (1). She focuses a lot on the value of getting a college education, and makes an argument that all the time and money spent on earning a degree may not be worth it in the end. McArlde uses several strategies to appeal to her reader’s, and does a great job of effectively using the Logos, Pathos, and Ethos appeals throughout her article.
Throughout the term in BPBE 272 there has been many important skills I have learned to help me pursue my goal in University. I have learned all key concepts of economics and also learned how to use them in my everyday life. This class has gave me tremendous help on how to look at the world in the way an economist does. You have taught us in a way that did not require us to just memorize the material but to actually take the time to learn about the information we are given. I will explain the main points I have learned in this class, what it means to have learned all of the information, How I have changed my perspective on economics, how I can apply my knowledge in the workforce and why this course was so important to me.
In his argument for the establishment of a public school system, Benjamin Rush does not waste any time addressing the obvious issue of taxpayer burden. While acknowledging this would warrant an initial investment, he insists that by establishing a system of public education in America would overtime cut taxes, and taxpayers would see a return on their initial investment [JEH1] [Rush, pg.678]. Rush maintains a position that as we acknowledge the benefits of learning spoken languages of the world, our youth would benefit as much learning the languages of finance and markets. To properly defend our liberties against the throes of tyranny, we must be aware of defending ourselves from economic tyranny. He establishes the potential merits of educating the youth in the matters of economics, arguing it provides “the best security
Education is widely regarded as a key factor in the economic and social development of a country. With the extremely rapid development of the society, in order to enhance their competitiveness, increasing young people choose to accept higher education. Yet, there are different attitudes about whether students should pay or not. Some people regard education as a basic right, which should therefore be provided free, while others think the individual student should have to shoulder some of the costs of his or her education. According to Matt Bruenig’s Dissent article “The Case Against Free College: Free college is paid for by the working class people who don 't attend”, Bruenig against the free college because it seems more fair and benefit to
In chapter 8, the core economic principle that displays itself often is The Consequences of Choices Lie in the Future. This principle presents the idea that what we are doing in today’s economy will have an impact on the future. Whether it is decisions on cutting benefits or raising taxes, any of these could cripple our futures economy. In the chapter, it discusses the fiscal policy and how it saved America’s economy after the depression. By monitoring the nation 's spending budget and taxes, so another depression or a recession does not occur.
Owen is a Ph.D. student in policy and economics at the University of Michigan and was a research assistant at Brookings’ Center in Washington D.C. Sawhill is also a senior who attends Brookings and is learning economic studies. In their essay Should Everyone Go to College, they emphasize that young adults
Chapter 11 1. Fiscal policy can be described as the use of government purchases, taxes, transfer payments, and government borrowing with an objective of influencing economy-wide variables such as the employment rates, the economic growth, and the rates of inflation (McEachern, 2015). 1. When all other factors are held constant, a decrease in government purchases will lead to an increase in the real GDP demanded 2. An increase in net taxes, holding other factors constant, will lead to an increase in the real GDP demanded.
This reaffirms his belief of this policy as a salvation for economics. He doesn’t care about any of his arguments previous to this one. He simply wants to save money rather than education. One who didn’t attend senior year should not be a reliable opinion to such a topic as this. He is too far out of his secondary education to know how the education system works as well.
Many people dream of a life filled with riches, but that dream is hard to obtain without a college degree. It is somewhat ironic how people dream of being a successful student and going to college but the cost of tuition turns that dream into a horrible nightmare. It is not a shock to most people when they that college tuition is expensive, but in the past few years it has increased to an all-time high. Lower and middle class students have now begun to realize that college tuition is holding them away from their dreams. Even though college tuition could provide opportunities for job creation and economic growth, tuition is not affordable for the average American household which in effect, prohibits students from taking opportunities like going to college in the first place.
Jose Espinoza Ms.Robledo May 4, 2016 English 1A/ Revised Throughout the years, it has become common to hear cases of students going into debt, and the number of college dropouts has been astounding as well. High school students looking to graduate encounter difficult decisions, and when making those decisions they need to look forward to hypothesize the outcome. America generally believes that a college degree is basically a requirement just for entering the working middle class. According to the essay “Should Everyone Go to College?” by Stephanie Owen and Isabel Sawhill, higher education is not a great investment for every student.
In grade schools core concepts such as history, math, english and science are taught because they are identified as concepts that will be useful to students in their future endeavors. I believe that finance is something equally relevant in our lives to merit its teaching in schools. The questions that such an endeavor arise is to what extent will such a curriculum have on the financial decisions of youth into adulthood? To what extent should financial literacy be taught in schools? Who should teach it?
Classical economics emphasises the fact free markets lead to an efficient outcome and are self-regulating. In macroeconomics, classical economics assumes the long run aggregate supply curve is inelastic; therefore any deviation from full employment will only be temporary. The Classical model stresses the importance of limiting government intervention and striving to keep markets free of potential barriers to their efficient operation. Keynesians argue that the economy can be below full capacity for a considerable time due to imperfect markets. Keynesians place a greater role for expansionary fiscal policy (government intervention) to overcome recession.
Adam Smith, David Ricardo or Karl Marx are known for many as the pioneers of contemporary economies. Their Work and researches were the bases of most of nowadays economic models used by countries around the world. Adam Smith, David Ricardo and their followers were labeled as the classical economists when later on Karl Marx and his followers were labeled as the Marxists. These two economic schools were some of the biggest in history, but yet differed in many ways. Through this paper, we would discuss the says of the Classical and Marxism schools concerning their views on wages, their different opinions about the theory of value, their sides about capital accumulation and finally the different point of view of the schools regarding the diminishing returns.