ipl-logo

Edward Snowden Argument Analysis

885 Words4 Pages

In June of 2013, Edward Snowden released documents revealing the National Security Association, surveillance programs. Edward Snowden brought about great debates on whether the NSA is correct in doing these surveillance programs on citizens, tracking them through technology. The NSA collects data through cell phones, messaging, social media, applications on phones, intercept photos, and many more ways reported by New York Public Radio. Our group decided to survey the class on basic information about the NSA, their attitudes towards it and possible policy changes. Subsequently, while deciding on the questions to ask we had to consider many different factors. First of all, we needed to ask questions of basic definition to consider how educated …show more content…

Many people are undecided on what they believe, based off our survey so arguments need to be effective. A neutral audience is a fair debate setting, for both individuals. Logos arguments will need to be very effective because of how split the audience is. One point of disagreement between my side and the audience is a disagreement with my argument as a whole. 50 percent of the audience disagrees with the statement that we should allow the NSA to continue their surveillance of citizens. Likewise, 50 percent of the audience will disagree with me on the fact that it is justified for the NSA to break the fourth amendment. The audience will definitely have to be convinced of my points, during the debate. For example, one of my points that the NSA surveillance tactics do work, I will have to convince the audience of this fact through statistics. Most of my points will require convincing the audience of them because I am on the negative side. My thesis will be opposed by half of the class from the start, my job is to convince the people who are on the edge why I am write. I expect my other debater to have a counter point to one of my arguments, that if people are doing nothing wrong they should not have anything to hide. I will need to come up with a rebuttal for their rebuttal that I am expecting to hear from them. A big cause for hope in the data is that it seemed many people are torn on what they believe and why they believe it. Many people in this issue seem to be, undecided on their beliefs. A problematic part of my debate, is that the arguments for NSA surveillance seem to be very limited. The affirmative side, has many more arguments to pull from to convince the audience. This means that my arguments, limited in nature will have to be very effective when I give them. It will be up to me to provide solid concise arguments to convince my audience of why we should allow the NSA

Show More
Related
996 Words | 4 Pages

The audience is persuaded

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

How could the school and parents of the teen-agers help their children to stop doing the high risk things? Elizabeth Kolbert did describe how the teenagers do dangerous things and cite lots of authority people’s words to prove that points in the article “Terrible Teens”. We are still on the way to stop the teenagers doing the things what will endanger themselves. Using appeal to authority, repetition and personification devices to show the teenagers are really dangerous without adult stay with them and make the reader feel the same with the author. Elizabeth Kolbert did use personification,repetition devices and appeal to authority in his story to make the article more clearly and through to our life.

Read More
614 Words | 3 Pages

Key topics that relate to this include PRISM, the surveillance program ran by national security agency; the death of Trayvon Martin; and the Google glasses, which are good examples of why it is necessary for the government to have a watchful eye over our society. PRISM, a highly secretive surveillance program run by the national security agency is a controversial topic that has been

Read More
953 Words | 4 Pages

The moment that the Twin Towers fell in New York, America became destined for change. In the wake of these attacks, the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 was quickly passed through congress, and signed by then-president, George W. Bush. The act itself gives the FBI and other government agencies the ability to do and use certain methods, many of which are already used by other law enforcement organizations, to help prevent future terrorist attacks. Since then, this piece of legislation has been the center of much debate and controversy. But, there is ample reason to believe that the Patriot Act is needed and effective.

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

The wiretapping program is used to collect data that is transmitted on a network and allows the government to eavesdrop without a warrant. The use of this program is easy for the NSA to snoop and allows the government to eavesdrop without having to present a warrant. President George W. Bush had addressed this program as a crucial part to the National Security Agency, yet this announcement led to the wild growth of the NSA’s power. The NSA took advantage of the program and used it to spy on the conversations between foreign nationals, U.S. citizens, and international communications. However, curious of the program and questioning President Bush’s speech, a group from the U.S. senate decided to look into the situation.

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

When it comes to arguments, debates, and anything else, you must do and say tailored things in order to show your point or justify how you're right. Comparable to the debate during the 1980 US presidential election, the two candidates, current President Jimmy Carter and California Governor Ronald Reagan, participated in a debate over how they would address inflation if elected, and they did so to persuade the public to vote for them in the election. In the debate, Ronald Reagan had a better argument because of what he said and how he said it. Firstly, in the debate about inflation, Ronald Reagan had a more compelling argument because he used evidence in the form of statistics.

Read More
260 Words | 2 Pages

Some questions to analyze the audience may be, do they believe your issue? what enables them to believe your stand? what background information do you need to persuade

Read More
1418 Words | 6 Pages

Edward Snowden perfectly sums up the thought process behind the rejection of the mass surveillance: “Privacy isn’t about something to hide. Privacy is about something to protect… freedom of speech doesn’t mean much if you can’t have a quiet space… arguing that you don’t have privacy because you have nothing to hide is like arguing that you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” (Document 2). The point of view is from an ardent Libertarian that has contributed to Ron Paul’s campaign numerous times. Edward Snowden firmly believes in the right to self.

Read More
1518 Words | 7 Pages

In response, the United States implemented the USA Patriot Act (Uniting and Strengthening America by providing appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act), significantly impacting homeland security within the country. The act introduced surveillance measures, such as monitoring communication networks like telephones and texts, to gather data and identify suspicious activity. Additionally, it allowed for the scrutiny of business records and financial transactions, aiding authorities in investigating potential terrorist acts and funding sources. According to statistics from the Pew Research Center, 42% of the public viewed the Patriot Act as a necessary tool to combat terrorism, while 34% believed it went too far and posed a threat to civil liberties. These differing perspectives reflect an ongoing debate regarding the act's impact on national security and civil liberties.

Read More
2274 Words | 10 Pages

The recent revelations about the NSA surveillance programme have cause concern and outrage by citizens and politicians across the world. What has been missing, though, is any extended discussion of why the government wants the surveillance and on what basis is it authorised. For many commentators surveillance is wrong and it cannot be justified. Some commentators have argued that surveillance is intrinsic to the nature of government and its ability to deliver the public good.[1] Few, though have looked at the surveillance within a wider context to understand how it developed. A notable exception is the work by Steven Aftergood.

Read More
541 Words | 3 Pages

The “Nothing-to-Hide Argument” Analyzed: In this rhetorical analysis, I will be taking a look at Daniel J. Solove’s essay “The Nothing-to-Hide Argument,” which is about privacy in the context of personal information and government data collection (Solove 734). Solove’s main argument in his essay is that the general public has a narrow perception of what privacy really is. The purpose behind his main argument is to expose the problems with the nothing-to-hide argument while presenting a way to challenge it for his target audience, government officials. Solove’s argument to his target audience is effective through his exemplary use of substance, organization, and style in his essay.

Read More
952 Words | 4 Pages

The NSA’s surveillance of American citizens caused a debate over whether or not the Fourth Amendment of the constitution was being violated. The NSA, and the Fourth Amendment have been a touchy subject for some American citizens. The NSA, or National Surveillance Agency, is being closely watched by American citizens since a debate has formed as to whether or not the actions of the NSA regarding the surveillance of American

Read More
1543 Words | 7 Pages

The NSA or the National Security Agency carries out most of the domestic surveillance in the United States. Before the 9/11 attacks the NSA needed approval from a court, but after the attacks, they were given free reign to copy any data that possibly linked to terrorist activities. This led to many arguments over whether this collection of data was unconstitutional or not. The extent of this surveillance shocked many people; many civil rights advocates thought that this surveillance breached United States citizens’ rights. Because of the threat of domestic surveillance in the United States it should be decreased drastically but not entirely stopped.

Read More
831 Words | 4 Pages

A Debating Democracy America has been built on the principle that everyone has a voice and that everyone should use it, this leads to an innumerable amount of arguments, some that still persist. In The Thirteen American Arguments by award-winning writer, NBC Analyst, and American journalist, Howard Fineman, the author outlines what he believes are the thirteen most fundamentals arguments in U.S history. These thirteen arguments as well the numerous others are the building blocks of democracy and debate in our country. One of the ideals that makes this country unique, is the value of free speech. Everyone has the freedom to make their voice heard to the rest of the country.

Read More
861 Words | 4 Pages

We live in a world where the communication is the foundation for sharing information between people and debating is a formal way of communicating. Debating on the “Insurance policies obtained through the Affordable Care Act should be replaced by High Deductible Health Plans paired with tax free Health Savings Accounts” was challenging in many ways. My team was on the con side. From the beginning, all members of the team agreed that the Affordable Care Act is a controversial and complicated topic, however, ACA has made a number of positive changes to the health care system and increased access to health care services. In addition, the ACA has a tremendous impact not just on patients, but also on health care providers and workers.

Read More

More about Edward Snowden Argument Analysis

Related Topics

Open Document