According to Slate.com “there has been a total of 137 fatal shooting that killed 297 victims since 1980”. Just by reading the title you can tell that the author LZ Granderson has a strong opinion on this subject. He writes this article because during the time of the article texas governor Rick Perry tried passing a bill that would teacher to conceal and carry in schools to try and prevent school shootings. LZ Granderson is a writer for ESPN and has a weekly column for CNN that he writes about controversial topics such as teachers with guns. LZ Granderson wants to show his readers what is going on, as well as why things like the law are happening.
Every time you look at the news there seems to be a new headline about the most recent mass shooting. With these shootings becoming more common many viewers are becoming desensitized making these murders in cold blood seem normal. In the article Broken Cannot Be the New Normal published in The Avion the author Victoria Jordan tries to persuade the readers that change needs to be made so that we as a society do not have to live in fear of being the victim of the next massacre. Although Jordan takes a stance on gun violence, her over-use of fallacies such as appeal to fear and pity as well as begging the question the left the article with inadequate evidence in addition she barely offers a solution to the problem that she clearly sees. While appeal to emotion can be an effective method to connect with your audience, Jordan however overuses emotion to the point it
Regulating guns will not stop all of the killings that are occurring in America, and there are better ways to cease the killings than regulating guns. Body Paragraph One: Topic Sentence: Regulating mental health will be more effective in ceasing killings with guns than regulating guns. In an analysis provided, 22 percent of the perpetrators of 235 mass killing, could be considered mentally ill, many of which were carried out with firearms (Qui). Almost 25% of mass shooting killers are being considered mentally ill
Three of the deadliest mass shootings in US modern history have happened in the last five months and people are searching for a change. Churches, concerts, schools, and other gun free zones are no longer safe for citizens of America, but why? Part of the country believes it’s the result of such easy accessibility to guns and by placing restriction on certain types of guns and certain people from obtaining guns, the problem will diminish. The other half of the country believes allowing more people to have guns, such as teachers, then we will be able to protect ourselves and put fear into the criminal's mind, therefore diminishing the problem as well. This conflict can be traced all the way back to November 22, 1963, shortly after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.
Como put it. By using people's unfamiliarity with firearms, agendas are being pushed further for gun controllers. A plain M4A1 rifle is legal in NY but merely because the same rifle could have a foldable stock, an extended mag, and/or a holographic sight, it looks threatening to the public in comparison. In “Why More Guns Won’t Make Us Safer”, Faircloth brings up a commonly used "fact" by gun controllers, the US "rate of homicides is dramatically higher than most countries…" while this is only partially true, note the writer omitted the numerical value of the statistic for the rate of homicides. 0.6% of all deaths in America are murders, translating to 6 out of 1000 people murdered, and of the 6, not all were murdered using guns.
The aforementioned article describes the debate occurring regarding the Texas massacre and the gun violence associated with it. 26 people were killed in the shooting, however the perpetrator himself soon became one of the many victims of a fatal gunshot wound and soon killed himself after being chased down. The population seems to have reached a divide where they are unsure whether this adds to or takes away from the constitution of the right to own guns. President Donald Trump claimed that the act was the work of a disabled man and that if Devin Patrick Kelley, the perpetrator, had not been shot, there would have been many more casualties. Meanwhile, those who oppose the second amendment persist in using this situation to dispute gun rights,
Guns don’t kill people. People kill people. Many believe this, but columnist Nicholas Kristof, author of “Our Blind Spot about Guns,” published in 2014 in the New York Times, disagrees. A rhetorical analysis should consist of: logos, pathos, and ethos. Kristof’s use of logos is strong due to the amount of facts and statistics he offers to his audience, but he fails to strongly use pathos and ethos, due to the lack of these elements Kristof’s argument is weakened.
Have we forgotten April 16th, 2007 or December 14th 2012. Today I see mixed emotions in the audience, emotions of sorrow, and some with faith that we need to stricter our gun laws. To those people i say what use are gun laws if they don't prevent mass shootings. Killers don't care about “no gun areas” and don’t care about gun regulations. All I killer needs is a gun the maliciousness and a school to
The AP “Gov.” class at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, is familiar with the debate; before they were even born, the big money - gun debate had already been in full swing. Discussions leading to debates on the local, county, state and federal level about gun control, highlighting the influence wrought by big money had many voices, but little impact on either issue. One voice can engage the public and bring forth change; that voice is Emma Gonzalez. On a day reserved for flowers, candy, sentiments of love and affection, the actions of one person changed lives and the day forever; from those actions were born a resolve and a voice.
We the people of the United States. We the people who have walked the streets of St. Louis in fear. We the people who are sick and tired of senseless violence in our nation. We cannot stand to have the blood of our people, Democrat, Republican, or otherwise being spilled on the streets of our city.
“Yes people pull the trigger- but guns are the instrument of death. Gun control is necessary, and delay means more death and horror”(“Eliot spitzer Quotes”). This quote was said by politician Eliot Spitzer on the serious topic of gun control. Each year roughly 117,000 americans are shot. Some peoples response to this devastating data is to either arm themselves or protest for stricter laws (“The Huffington Post”).
The use of and the owning of guns is a very hot and debated topic in society today. For many, this is a life and death debate due to the recent and numerous school shootings. These school shootings have caused an outcry for more gun control, specifically in relation to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Despite these calls, increased gun control is not the answer. Most gun owners’ use their guns responsibly and for good purposes.
“Our Blind Spot about Guns” Rhetorical Analysis Essay American Journalist, Nicholas Kristof, in his essay, “Our Blind Spot about Guns”, addresses that if only guns were regulated and controlled like cars, there would be less fatalities. Kristof’s purpose is to emphasize how much safer cars are now than in the past, while guns do not have the same precautions. He constructs a compelling tone in order to convince the reader that the government should take more control on the safety of guns and who purchases them. Kristof builds credibility by successfully exerting emotional appeals on the audience, citing plausible statistics, and discussing what could possibly be done to prevent gun fatalities. Kristof begins his essay by discussing how automobile
Hi, my name is Erin Elizabeth Crawford. I am a student at Marshall County High School (MCHS). I am going to tell you what happened on January 23, 2018, at 7:57 a.m. central time. Each time there is a school shooting, it breaks my heart. An each time there is a school shooting, I pray that it is the last school shooting, but it is not.
The sound of a gun shooting is probably the worst and most terrifying sound that people want to hear. However, nowadays people in the United States are attacking by this sound more often due to the lack of gun control. The function of the guns is very limited. They are meant to be used as weapons in military operations such as defending their own countries. As we all know citizens in U.S. have the right to possess guns that should be used as one of the self-defending tools.
