ipl-logo

Emptiness Charge In Kant's Moral Philosophy

10244 Words41 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Utilitarianism and kantianism meaning

he Emptiness Charge in Kant’s Moral Philosophy Introduction: The Emptiness Charge in Kant’s Moral Philosophy Chapter One: Kant’s Formalism and its Emptiness Charge 1.1 Hegel’s Empty Formalism Objection 1.1.1 The Context of Categorical Imperative 1.1.2 The Limited Interpretation of Hegel’s Emptiness Charge 1.1.3 The Systematic Interpretation of Emptiness Charge 1.2. Mill’s Utilitarianism Charge 1.2.1 Mill’s Utilitarianism 1.2.2 Mill’s Consequentialism Chapter Two: The Formalistic Expressions in Kant’s Ethical Writings 2.1. Kant’s early view 2.2. The Critique of Pure Reason 2.3. The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals 2.4. The Critique of Practical Reason 2.5. The Metaphysics of Morals Chapter Three: Rethinking the Emptiness …show more content…

Zweig (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999) Gr ‘Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals,’ translated by M.J. Gregor in Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996) pp. 43-108 KPV Critique of Practical Reason, translated by M.J. Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996) KRV Critique of Pure Reason, translated by P. Guyer and A. Wood (Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press, 1997) KU Critique of the Power of Judgment, translated by P. Guyer and E. Matthews (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000) LE Lectures on Ethics, translated by Louis Infield (New York: Harper, 1963) MS Metaphysics of Morals, translated by M.J. Gregor in Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press, 1996) pp. 365-603 P Inquiry Concerning the Distinctness of the Principles of Natural Theology and Morals, translat-ed by L.W. Beck in Kant: Selections (New York: MacMillan Publishing, 1988) pp. 5-9 R Religion within the Limits of Reason Alone, translated by T. Greene and H.Hudson (New York: Harper Row, 1960) TP on the Common Saying: That May Be True In Theory, But It Is Of No Use in Practice, trans-lated by M.J. Gregor in Practical Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996) pp.

Show More
Related
1376 Words | 6 Pages

The final chapter, chapter 21, of Russ Shafer-Landau’s book, The Fundamentals of Ethics, emphasis is placed on the fact that moral objectivity is not always completely universal but does not mean the idea of moral objectivism has to be rejected. Moral objectivism states that moral standards should be universal but there are some circumstances and exceptions to this claim. Shafer-Landau presents eleven arguments in chapter 21 that some consider challenges to the universality principle of moral objectivity. Not only will moral objectivism be examined in this paper but also another philosophical view known as moral skepticism will be discussed. In addition to the arguments present by Shafter-Landau’s book this paper will include an analysis from

Read More
967 Words | 4 Pages

Peter Singer in his famous paper “Famine, Affluence and Morality” begins with assumptions “The suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad” also he gives his second assumption that “if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it”. Singer gives an application of his principle, by ”the drowning child in the pond” case. Imagine you are walking past a pond and you see a little toddler drowning in the shallow pond, you have 2 options now: first- you can pull out he child and save him, however you will ruin your favorite expensive shoes.

Read More
1697 Words | 7 Pages

(pp. 321-322) Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co. Kant, I. (1993). Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals. In Schwehn, M. R. & Bass, D. C. (Ed.)

Read More
780 Words | 4 Pages

J. L. Mackie on his writing “The Subjectivity of Values” develops two main arguments against the objectivity of values. Mackie states, “There are no objective values” (pg.175) where he expresses his belief that there are no objective, absolute or universal moral truths and argues in favor of moral skepticism, the view that people cannot have knowledge about morality. While actions naturally can be perceived as morally good or bad, there is nothing that makes them objectively good or bad. Mackie presents two main arguments to corroborate his critique in morality. The argument from relativity in which he claims there are no objective values and the argument from queerness where objective values would be different from any other thing in the universe (pg. 174).

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

There is an interesting question to be raised when discussing the philosophy of Kant and his approach toward evil. The question lies in whether Kant’s philosophy is efficient to explain human predicament, that is, a person’s suffering in relation to a cause—usually evil—that he is subject to. In my opinion, although Kant’s arguments concerning evil are clear and logical in a sense, his theory is still too flawed to properly explain human predicament. In this paper, I will provide two reasons, which I would like to call common sense, to argue my position. First, Kant places too much emphasis on the intent behind an action rather than the consequence of the action itself.

Read More
995 Words | 4 Pages

Aaliyah Ripley Final Exam 05/04/16 There are different forms of attachment the mother and infant have which occurs around 8 or 9 months. There are four different types of attachment, secure, avoidant, resistant, and disorganized. Secure attachment is which happens to about 60 - 65% of babies in the United States. It’s when the mother leaves and the baby may or may not cry but when the mother comes back, all the infant wants to do is be with its mother.

Read More
1022 Words | 5 Pages

Kant emphasizes that only the law and pure respect for the law should determine the will. However, when taken in context with his other remarks in the Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, it is unclear how the law can be anything other than arbitrary. Kant claims that results do not matter as it is the will that determines morality. This means that no matter the law, following it is the moral thing to do. This raises significant problems.

Read More
1057 Words | 5 Pages

In “The Subjectivity of Values,” J.L Mackie argues for Error Theory. Error Theory is a version of moral skepticism. This version of moral skepticism denies the existence of right and wrong as “intrinsically normative entities on fundamental grounds as unsure about what kinds of things such entities would be, if they existed” (Mackie 1977). His ‘Central Argument’ article affirms two things: Objective values provide reason to motivate anyone aware, and the awareness of some objective reason would provide reason in such a way that everyone would be motivated (to some extent) to act in accordance with the value.

Read More
1114 Words | 5 Pages

As I began reading Kant’s Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant claims that the NLF of the CI tests for moral worth. In the second section of the book, Kant begins to explain the categorical imperative as the opposite of as hypothetical imperative identifying situations for which each imperative would fall. Explaining that a hypothetical imperative is only followed in certain situations as a means to something else while the CI is followed unconditionally no matter the situation “as good in itself” and to its own end. In this paper, I intend to show what the NLF has to do with testing moral worth and how the criteria are a formidable way to judge morality. I plan on completing this by quoting and analyzing relative information on the

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

There are negative theological implications to Mmanuel Kant ’s philosophy. According to the reception of Mmanuel Kant’s work and traditional interpretation, his philosophy’s impact on theology as a discipline had been primarily negative. The Pure Reason’s critique cuts off all access to knowledge of God, and, in such doing, demolished the foundations for any positive theology and the dogmatic metaphysics’ foundation. Since traditional interpreters understood these theoretical restrictions on the inescapable knowledge of God, Kant’s subsequent philosophical missions were thought to aim merely at reducing the stifling effects when it looked on theologically significant matters.

Read More
243 Words | 1 Pages

Kant’s Categorical Imperative also includes three versions: the formula from universal law, the formula from natural law, and the formula

Read More
1593 Words | 7 Pages

Tyler Smith 17th and 18th Century Philosophy Kant’s Notion of Pure Reason and The Influence of It Immanuel Kant was a philosopher who set major precedents for the philosophy world. By combining two trains of thought which had long been debated, Kant was able to be one of the most influential Philosophers in history. In this paper I will argue multiple things. I will argue the rationalist and empiricist which influenced Kant the most. I will argue that Kant’s synthesis was successful.

Read More
1222 Words | 5 Pages

I hope to convince the reader that Kant’s Categorical Imperative is the better way to live a morally conscious life and more practical to follow as well. First I will briefly describe both Kant’s and Mill’s principles. Then I will go on to explain the advantages and disadvantages of both. Finally, I hope to provide a counterargument for some of Kant’s Categorical Imperatives downfalls. Kant states the Categorical Imperative as: "Act as if the maxim of your action were to become through your will and general natural law."

Read More
1255 Words | 6 Pages

He synthesized early modern rationalism and empiricism, set the terms for much of nineteenth and twentieth century philosophy, and continues to exercise a significant influence today in metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, aesthetics, and other fields. The fundamental idea of Kant 's “critical philosophy” — especially in his three Critiques: the Critique of Pure Reason (1781, 1787), the Critique of Practical Reason (1788), and the Critique of the Power of Judgment (1790) — is human autonomy. He argues that the human understanding is the source of the general laws of nature that structure all our experience; and that human reason gives itself the moral law, which is our basis for belief in God, freedom, and immortality. Therefore, scientific knowledge, morality, and religious belief are mutually consistent and secure because they all rest on the same foundation of human autonomy, which is also the final end of nature according to the teleological worldview of reflecting judgment that Kant introduces to unify the theoretical and practical parts of his philosophical

Read More
1228 Words | 5 Pages

Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill are two of the most notable philosophers in normative ethics. This branch of ethics is based on moral standards that determine what is considered morally right and wrong. This paper will focus on Immanuel Kant’s theory of deontology and J.S. Mill’s theory of utilitarianism. While Mill takes a consequentialist approach, focused on the belief that actions are right if they are for the benefit of a majority, Kant is solely concerned with the nature of duty and obligation, regardless of the outcome. This paper will also reveal that Kantian ethics, in my opinion, is a better moral law to follow compared to the utilitarian position.

Read More

More about Emptiness Charge In Kant's Moral Philosophy

Related Topics

Open Document