ipl-logo

Essay On Conflicts In America

1086 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Concerns between the federalists and antifederalists

Conflicts in America Americans tend to disagree on many issues ranging from equality to who is sovereign over what. Politics and government aide in the resolution of some issues, or at least aide in creating peace amongst individuals, groups, cultures, and the States. Most of the tensions today in the United States can probably never be fully resolved because there will always be an opposing viewpoint or a favoring viewpoint to conflicts. A majority of these opposing viewpoints come from a majority and a minority populous. One of the biggest issues faced in America today is the degradation of the Constitution and the idea of who is sovereign over what because many individuals don’t share the same viewpoints on this issue. The issue of sovereignty dates back to before the Constitution was even ratified when Great Britain tried to be sovereign over a new land that was overseas. As the tension between Americans, then still Brits, built between colonists and the Crown, the crown eventually sent German …show more content…

The main struggle on ratifying the Constitution came from the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists disagreeing on sovereignty. The Federalists wanted a strong, sovereign, central government and were wholly in favor of the Constitution. Anti-Federalists opposed of a sovereign central government arguing that a strong central government would erode the sovereignty of the States and the common person, eventually taking away a person’s rights and liberties. Anti-Federalists would only agree to ratify the Constitution if a Bill of Rights was in place before ratification – and while Federalists disagreed on the notion of a Bill of Rights, they eventually allowed it because they agreed that a dual soveriengty (which forged a relationship between the States and the National Government) was better than no

Show More
Related

Ratifying The Constitution Dbq

248 Words | 1 Pages

The debate was during the ratification of the Constitution. The anti-federalists believed that it gave too much power to the federal government. While both sides agreed that something different from the Articles of Confederation had to be created, many were uncomfortable with how far the Constitution went, and worried that the states would lose their sovereignty. The Federalists supported the Constitution, because they believed that the nation could only succeed with a strong national government.

Read More

Alexander Hamilton's Contribution Of The Preamble To The Constitution

1511 Words | 7 Pages

Lectures Lecture 14 “Questions to Consider #1”: Why did the Anti Federalists object so strongly to the Preamble to the Constitution? The Anti-Federalists objected so strongly to Preamble to the Constitution due to the fact the Preamble establishes powers for the three branches of government, states’ relations, mode of amendment, debts, national supremacy, oath of office, and amendment ratification. This group felts as though when the federalists wanting to create a strong central government would not be strong enough if the Preamble was not put into place. Lecture 14 states, “Anti-federalists suspicious of central power fought the new Constitution tenaciously…..

Read More

Ratification Of The Us Constitution Dbq Essay

827 Words | 4 Pages

Hence Federalists came up with the Bill of Rights as a way to get the Constitution ratified and for people to really see a needed change. The Bill Of Rights which lists specific prohibitions on governmental power, lead the Anti-Federalists to be less fearful of the new Constitution . This guaranteed that the people would still remain to have rights, but the strong central government that the country needed would have to be approved. The 1804 Map of the nation shows that even after the ratification of the United States Constitution there still continued to be “commotion” and dispute in the country.(Document 8) George Washington stated that the people should have a say in the nation and government and everything should not be left to the government to decide.(Document 3) Although George Washington was a Federalist many believed he showed a point of view that seemed to be Anti-Federalists. Many believed that The Bill of Rights needed to be changed and modified and a new document’s time to come into place.

Read More

Explain What Compromises Were Made At The Constitutional Convention

705 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Read More

The Argument Against The Anti-Federalists

99 Words | 1 Pages

The Federalists wanted a strong central government. The Anti- Federalists claims Constitution gives the central government too much power and, and they worried about the new constitution will not give them any rights. That the new system threatened freedom; Also, threatened the sovereignty of the states and personal liberties; failed to protect individual rights. Besides, some of famous peoples such as " Patrick Henry" and artists have came out against the Constitution. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful in stopping the passage of the Constitution, their efforts have been responsible for the creation and implementation of the Bill of

Read More

Similarities Between 1776 And The Constitution

1396 Words | 6 Pages

ome may argue that Ellis is wrong, and that there is continuity between the American Revolution of 1776 and the Constitution. They may argue that the founding fathers did in fact, “bring forth a new nation” in 1776 which did not change much when the Constitution was ratified. This nation of sorts may be characterized by its disjointedness, and its unity in its desire to stay that way. As Ellis pointed out in the beginning of his book, the states “regarded themselves as mini-nations of their own.” This would be supported by the fact that in the last two Supreme Court cases detailed above, there was serious opposition from people who saw the Court’s decision as an encroachment on state’s rights.

Read More

American Citizens Dbq

74 Words | 1 Pages

Not long after the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, the American citizens began to disagree about how the United States should operate. They were conflicted about how much power the federal government should possess, as stated in Chapter 10 of History in the Making, which says that “at heart, Federalists and Republicans disagreed about how much power to vest in the central government or, conversely, about how capable the people were in governing

Read More

How Are The Articles Of Confederation Different From The Constitution

696 Words | 3 Pages

Creating a government that was strong enough to overcome other governments was key, but not so powerful that it concerned the people of their own state’s individual rights. There were many American diplomats that contributed to the first constitution or The Articles of Confederation. Opinions were given, disagreements took place, and revisions were made. Still there were some that were

Read More

Individual Rights Dbq

204 Words | 1 Pages

There was a division among the people as to whether or not individual rights should be included in the Constitution. The Anti-Federalist did not want a strong centralized government. Others wanted the guarantee of a written document that protected the freedoms they had fought so hard to earn. The Bill of Rights was designed to protect the right citizens believed belonged to them.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Ratifying The Constitution

764 Words | 4 Pages

Even though this document made a great impact on our nation at the time of its writing, the path to ratification was not straight forward. In the summer of 1787, debate was waged in the newspapers, articles, and state conventions regarding the division of power among groups. The Federalists favored a strong national government and therefore, supported the Constitution. The opponents, however, named themselves the Anti-Federalists, and they argued that the new plan handed too much power to the central government. Ultimately, before it could go into effect, nine of the thirteen states needed to ratify the document.

Read More

Controversies Over The Ratification Of The Constitution

260 Words | 2 Pages

The controversies over the ratification of the Constitution was taxation, too much power to the President, trading, and the lack of Bill of Rights. There were people who agreed to ratify the Constitution the way it is, which were called federalists. Federalists reasoned that Americans should ratify the Constitution because Americans are allowed to ask for additional amendments after they ratify the Constitution. The ability to be able to request additional amendments after supported the Federalist’s point of view because the Anti-federalists may ask for further amendments after which could happen after they ratify the Constitution.

Read More

Pros And Cons Of The Constitution

656 Words | 3 Pages

The Constitution was drafted as a replacement to the Articles of Confederation—the first constitution of the US which loosely held the states together. When the Constitution was being drafted, there was much debate on how much power the Central Government should have. The Anti-Federalists believed in States’ Rights, while the Federalists wanted to give more power to the Central Government. The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratifying of the Constitution. A compromise was made—the new Constitution of the United States would include a Bill of Rights.

Read More

Robert Yates Anti Federalist 17 Summary

445 Words | 2 Pages

The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government an excessive amount of power, and while not a Bill of Rights the folks would be in danger of oppression. Both Hamilton and Madison argued that the Constitution did not want a Bill of Rights, that it might produce a "parchment barrier" that restricted the rights of the folks, as critical protective

Read More

People Oriented America's Constitution Analysis

1027 Words | 5 Pages

From the American Constitution, we can easily find that the most important element of American constitutionalism is the theory of people's sovereignty. The theory of people's sovereignty explains why constitutionalism is generated and what purpose is generated. In the concept of American constitutionalism, it contains the rich experience of human political practice and the inevitable common law of rule of law. The constitutional system of rights is essentially a question of whether a person has dignity. If a person thinks that man should live with dignity, then this person will certainly the ideal of this right.

Read More

Essay On Conflict Theory

497 Words | 2 Pages

As a member of a minority group the conflict theory speaks to me a lot, we try to get all the power that is/was taken from us. We have to proof ourselves on a daily basis to society and ourselves that we are equals and we should have the same amount of respect as anyone else. Even though many mic even though many many many might say there 's no there 's no inequality or power difference within race groups or ethnicity groups there is. As a minority I see inequalities and power difference a lot and is not from people my age but is from people who are older than. Who believe because I am a Latina woman I don’t deserve the same rights or respect.

Read More

More about Essay On Conflicts In America

Open Document