ipl-logo

Essay On Death Penalty In Canada

1372 Words6 Pages

Should Canada Reinstate The Death Penalty For [First-Degree] Murder?
Intro Needed

Looking at this problem from a non-Christian level, it depends on your conscience and status in the world. From the point of view of a court judge, they might not want to deal the stress of ordering a death penalty. For example, the murder rates doubled in the ten years after Canada ended the death penalty for first-degree murder. You may think that this is because murderers didn’t have to die if they got caught. It might have been but studies in Texas and California (Where the death penalty is still in place) showed that murder rates were unaffected by the punishments received. You then would suspect that this was because the judges wouldn’t be worried that they were basically murdering the person guilty of murder. Your life might be altered because of your own personal guilt and conscience telling you what you did was wrong, so now you could charge someone guilty of murder without having that weight on your back. Plus, what if you later found out that the …show more content…

As soon as we start taking them away and behaving in a savage way, such as retaliating to murder with murder, we will start to lose that identity and may become like other nations ruled by fear. In this aspect, we don’t care about people’s feelings and our “primary concern here is not compassion for the murderer”. Based on the identity of Canada and how our freedom was made to work, the death penalty was a bad thing to have. If you again consider the fact that mistakes have been made about who is guilty of murder (8 Canadians convicted of murder after the abolishment of the death penalty were innocent), then why put innocent people at risk? If a murderer had a grudge against someone or someone found out that they were planning something, the murderer could frame them and get them executed if there was a death penalty option in

Show More
Related
3061 Words | 13 Pages

Relevant Canadian Laws Firstly, Section 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that “everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice” (Government of Canada). This section of the CCRF applies to all Canadians, and in relation to capital punishment, overrules it greatly. Section 7 protects an individual's right to life, and thus, the government must not directly or indirectly cause death to a person. Since capital punishment involves the intentional ending of one’s life, it is a direct contradiction of the right to life stated in Section 7. Further, it can also be argued that capital punishment infringes upon another segment of Section 7, the right to security of the person, which applies to situations where physical or mental health is put

Read More
541 Words | 3 Pages

For many years, Australia has debated if they should reintroduce death penalty or not. The year 1967 was the last time when Australia used death penalty as a punishment. There are a total of 22 countries in the world where death penalty is still legal and present and these include countries such as America, China, Afghanistan and North Korea. Despite death penalty still being legal in many countries, it appears that Australia should not re-introduce death penalty. Death penalty should not be legal in Australia since there are other ways to punish a criminal that does not involve death and there never is a humane way to kill an individual.

Read More
1733 Words | 7 Pages

During the Progressive period, some states started to eliminate the death penalty: “six states completely outlawed the death penalty and three limited it to the rarely committed crimes of treason and first-degree murder of a law enforcement official” (FindLaw). World War 1 had caused six of these states to return to capital punishment. With the increase of death rates, people started to become more and more against the idea of the death penalty. From the “1920s to the 1940s, there was a revival in the use of the death penalty” (FindLaw). During this time frame, the death penalty increased greatly.

Read More
532 Words | 3 Pages

I believe murders and other “brutal criminals” should not be executed instead of spending life in jail. From the flaws in the justice system, success rates of rehabilitation and the lack of mental illness being represented is a major issue that needs to be addressed. The Canadian Justice System has its challenges, but its flaws outshine the good it has done. I'm personally aware of a situation where an individual was convicted for 2nd degree murder. Only after 3 years were they able to get their murder charge reduced to an accessory, which was more appropriate when reviewing the case.

Read More
1075 Words | 5 Pages

(Amnesty International) (1). By eliminating the death penalty in Canada, Trudeau protected the right to live, and the right to live free from torture; two of the most significant human rights. The abolishment of the death penalty in Canada also led to a more optimistic justice system for criminals. The justice system no longer punished people by taking their life. Criminals were now allowed to better themselves while serving their time rather than being killed in a ‘humane’ way.

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

An argument that has been made many times before, but has a solid point, is that the government is sending the wrong message. With the death penalty in place, it sends the message that it is okay to kill people who have killed other people. With that being said it opens the doors for other citizens to take it into their own hands. If it is alright for the government to kill murderers, they can use this reasoning to justify killing that person because they want

Read More
437 Words | 2 Pages

Canada, one of the countries in the world that have a low murder rate. But even with such low rates, why do some Canadians want to reinstate the death penalty? Is it really necessary to bring back what we have already abolished? Or should we fight our urges for vengeance and look for a solution that 's morally right? Clifford Olson, Allan Legere, Robert Pickton, Paul Bernardo and Karla Holmolka.

Read More
1044 Words | 5 Pages

Currently, the death sentence is only applied to those who commit murder, however, in the past, it has also been used for rape and armed robbery. Arguing in favor it can seem justifiable to take the life of a person who unjustifiably took the life of someone else. And with murder being the only way to be sentenced to the death penalty it seems fitting. Along with that, it provides deterrence from committing murder for possibly many people. The deterrence that execution provides is a debated topic nested into another controversial topic.

Read More
791 Words | 4 Pages

Should America continue to allow the death penalty? This essay will tell you why America should not be continue the death penalty. For starters, the death penalty is punishment by death; usually resulting after a crime that America calls capital crimes or capital offences. There are many of reasons why the death penalty should not be carried out in America or anywhere “Application of the death penalty tends to be arbitrary and capricious; for similar crimes, some are sentenced to death while others are not.”

Read More
601 Words | 3 Pages

Should Capital Punishment Be Allowed in Canada? Capital punishment is an extremely sensitive topic. Oxford Dictionary defines it as “the legally authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime.” It is otherwise known as the death penalty. There are many forms of capital punishment practiced in United States such as electrocution, execution or even gas chamber.

Read More
353 Words | 2 Pages

Since the Death Penalty has stopped, there has been more crime in Canada. People who are in jail, have not been learning their lesson. If someone comes out of jail, they can do something bad and end up in jail again. First of all, they will not realize what they 've done. Second, it costs about 1,000 dollars just to put them in jail, and the Death penalty Is much cheaper.

Read More
857 Words | 4 Pages

The Death Penalty Should Not be Reintroduced to Australia The death penalty. Commonly used as capital punishment in fifty-six countries for severe crimes. Is a capital punishment that should remain abolished in Australia. This inhumane, cruel injustice used as a “punishment” is used on death row prisoners that may not even be guilty.

Read More
1230 Words | 5 Pages

They don’t get to put the killer on trial and say what they believe is right. The victims families have to do everything that they believe the victim would want. Everyone in this world has someone. The effects of these murders are stuck with the families and friends. The death penalty can stop people from seeking revenge (“ the ultimate punishment letter”).

Read More
659 Words | 3 Pages

Although the death penalty may bring some closure to families of the victims and even the victims themselves it still should be abolished because the negatives outweigh the positives. People could be murdered by the state even if they are innocent. They are taking away any chance these people have at a normal life even though it's a life that they deserve and did nothing to have it taken away. 6. Conclusion

Read More
961 Words | 4 Pages

Another pressing issue associated with the death penalty is the morals behind it. It teaches society that if someone has done something wrong you could just murder

Read More

More about Essay On Death Penalty In Canada

Related Topics

Open Document