The Fourth Amendment states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses papers, and effects..." this in the minds of the people alludes to the right of privacy. However, society misses the other half of this Amendment, which is, "...against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause..." In the case of the Government having moderation over the internet, people use the Fourth Amendment on their side. Yet, the Amendment supports the side of the Government. When the Government moderates the internet, they are doing it for the safety of the nation. They are moderating the internet with a probable cause, which is allowed hence it is stated in the second half of the Fourth Amendment which everyone …show more content…
In 2017 leading into 2018 as well, the term “Net Neutrality†was thrown around by everyone and their mother. Yet, none of the people are actually educated on what it actually means. People are fighting the Government that the internet will not be “free†anymore, when that is not what Net Neutrality means at all. Getting rid of Net Neutrality means that the Government will have control to moderate the internet and allow services like Verizon or AT&T to speed up, slow down, or block anything they want dealing with their own company, which they should be allowed to do anyway since it is their own company. Not only is getting rid of Net Neutrality a great thing, but people have to keep in mind that net Neutrality was created in 2015! Before 2015, the internet was still exactly the same in terms of the Government and what you can and cannot do. It just goes to show that people should become more educated before speaking on a subject they know absolutely nothing about but they want to speak anyway since all people want to do is go against the Government for any reason they