ipl-logo

Essay On Gun Control In Australia

630 Words3 Pages

Continuing to allow our citizens to own and operate firearms is not just basic freedom, it is safety. Facts involving the distribution of guns prove that making guns harder to buy through retail will not solve any problems. By examining what has taken place in Australia, it is clear that if guns are taken away from the citizens, it will not help lower crimes committed or deaths related to guns. In order to prevent crime, including homicides and mass shootings, gun control laws shouldn't infringe upon citizens constitutional rights to safety and self defense. It is assumed that if stricter gun laws that restricted people from buying guns by adding additional requirements when purchasing like deeper background checks took place, less crimes would be committed. However, a large majority of criminals don't buy their guns from licensed dealers. Criminals have proven to buy or take their guns from illegal markets, family …show more content…

In Australia, guns were taken by the government in what they referred to as a buy back set up but it was mandatory. Immediately after this, the country’s rape, assault, and other crimes increased dramatically but steadily lowered after the course of several years. Gun control has actually had no significant impact on Australia’s murder rates. They have remained steady, proving that increased gun control has no affect on overall murder rates. Because it is clear that “gun control has no significant impact on murder rates” we can be sure that increased gun control has very little to no benefits (King). Similar results were seen in the United Kingdom after all handguns were banned. Homicides rates have been higher than before the ban in 1997 in all but one year. Specifically, handgun homicides have nearly doubled as a result of the

Show More
Related
806 Words | 4 Pages

Ryan Clark Adeline Mitchell English 125 22 July 2015 An Annotated Bibliography Wright, Stephen E. "Gun Control Laws Will Not Save Lives." Guns and Crime. Ed. Christine Watkins.

Read More
1010 Words | 5 Pages

During the late 1990’s and early 2000’s murder rate was considerably increased with stricter laws regarding firearms. In central Russia, where handguns were banned, the murder rate was about 10 times more than Finland, where handguns were legal. Not only was the murder rate 10 times more than in Finland, but it was about 25 times more than Norway, where handguns were legal [3]. This is just one example of how guns can reduce murder rate. Another example is “Vermont: one of the safest five states in the country.

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

To combat mass shootings, both countries decided to implement board laws that banned certain guns, as well as introducing buybacks that would give money to individuals who turned in their firearms. It is hard to gauge whether that the reforms to firearms did work for Great Britain since there were hardly any mass shootings to begin with (Libresco). Leah Libresco and Carl Bialik also bring to light that “In Australia, homicides declined after the ban and buyback, but homicides had already been falling, according to a 2003 analysis by criminologists Peter Reuter and Jenny Mouzos.”. Another aspect that individuals fail to realize when using these two countries as examples is that both countries are small islands which creates the task of importing illegal guns harder as well as having a smaller pool of guns to control (Libresco). Finally, the most important difference that gun control advocates choose to neglect is that America has the Second Amendment where as Great Britain and Australia do

Read More
1673 Words | 7 Pages

‘’Guns are responsible for over thirty-three thousand deaths in the United States annually, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).. In 2014, the CDC reported that 11,008 of the 15,872 homicides committed in the United States that year involved a firearm. Of the 42,826 suicides reported that year, 21,386 involved a firearm. These statistics have inspired efforts at the federal and state levels to enact gun control legislation to reduce crime and violence’’(‘’Gun Control’’). According to the statistic guns are held for over 33,000 deaths in the United States.

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

Some days crime rates are up and then the next they are down, what we do know is that America is becoming safer. In 2005, 11,346 persons were killed by firearm violence 477,040 persons were victims of a crime committed with a firearm, (National Institute of Justice). Surprisingly, a lot of gun violence in America is related to self defense. Between 1987 and 1990 it was found that guns were used in defense during a crime incident 64,615 times annually. This equates to two times out of 1,000 incidents (0.2%) that occurred in this time frame.

Read More
1837 Words | 8 Pages

In most recent years, legislation in the United States has done little to implement stricter gun control laws due to the gridlocks in Congress surrounding the divisive issue. The Assault Weapon Ban was created in 1994 and lasted until 2004, and during these years, it became illegal to produce certain automatic weapons and purchase high capacity cartridges. After the creation of this law, many weapon manufacturers began to find ways around the ban by modifying weapons so they did not fall into the category of banned firearms (Plumer). With the research that exists today it is hard to credit the ban with reducing gun violence, but statistically during this time period the number of people killed in mass shootings did go down and since the ban has expired the number of mass shootings per year has

Read More
1553 Words | 7 Pages

With irresponsible gun owners and weak gun restrictions, the likelihood of an undiagnosed psychopath to purchase an automatic rifle and unload it on a public audience skyrockets. My proof of gun control’s effectiveness lies in the Pacific Ocean: Australia. Ever since their first major shooting, they refused to sell any more guns and offered a buyback to each citizen; ever since this law was put into place in 1996 after the Port Arthur incident, their collective death toll from massacres never reached anywhere close to our annual amount. Those who believe a black market will still dominate need to consider the real issue at stake here: the government is legally distributing them with a rather simple set of tasks to

Read More
218 Words | 1 Pages

Gun control as stated in the last source is a major issue in America. Studies have been done to see if there is any correlation between higher or lower crimes involving guns due to strong or weak gun control policies. This journal talks about how they performed a study involving four states Florida, Texas, Michigan, and Pennsylvania. From these four states they used statistics on specific types of crimes that could involve a gun, murder, property crime, rape, assault, and many more. When they studied these states with different gun policies with these types of crimes they found that there is zero correlation to the amount of crimes involving guns to the laws in place.

Read More
771 Words | 4 Pages

Gun control advocates, led by New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, have been pushing for laws that would help target illegal gun trafficking: allowing states access to gun-trace data, requiring background checks at gun shows, and forcing gun owners to report lost or stolen weapons” (In Congress, the Uphill Battle for Gun Control par. 8) A lot of criminals buy their guns illegally, they often steal the guns or get them from black market purchases. This proves that those who don’t follow the law bypass from background checks and other laws. Gun control simply won’t work, even if the government took all guns away, ( how would the government even know if a criminal or someone who has an agenda to kill has a gun?)

Read More
942 Words | 4 Pages

Moorhouse, John C, and Brent Wanner. “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control?” Ebscohost, 1 Jan. 2006, web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/ pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=db378b8b-d9e7-4ee7-b26c-460bc1177bd4%40sessionmgr4008. Moorhouse and Wanner, in their article “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control”, studied whether or not gun control reduced gun violence in individual states. The overarching theme throughout the individual states is that gun control doesn’t reduce gun violence and is very ineffective.

Read More
1432 Words | 6 Pages

They can be used to defend and protect as well as to threaten and kill. Guns and crime go together. A study conducted by the American Journal of Public Health found that the legal purchase of a gun seems to be associated with an increased risk of violent death. Every year, Americans are shocked by numerous mass shootings and senseless acts of violence involving guns and weapons. And, every year around 100,000 people are shot among which 18,000 are children and teens (Lane, 131).

Read More
872 Words | 4 Pages

Before researching more in depth, I believe bad people do bad things and banning guns will not be effective in stopping it. Australia is a great example of a country banning certain guns and the crime and homicide rate have both

Read More
1634 Words | 7 Pages

Instead of banning or limiting guns, the evidence will show that removing the current restrictions and targeting individuals instead of guns will be a more effective process. The topic of gun control has two polarized opinions. One such opinion targets the individuals responsible for the crime, instead of just the weapons. John Moorhouse and Brent Wanner tackle the issue of gun control in their article “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control”, which was published in 2006 in the twenty-sixth volume of the Cato Journal. These researchers looked at the effects gun control laws had on violent crime and gun violence in the individual states.

Read More
1774 Words | 8 Pages

Moreover, if the ownership of guns is limited, it will help prevent unnecessary deaths and violence caused by gun owners, especially students. Gun ownership should be totally controlled and regulated by the government because they will help in limiting the number of people who own guns. When gun

Read More
971 Words | 4 Pages

"In 1990, handguns were used to kill approximately 48 people in Japan, 8 in Great Britain, 34 in Switzerland, 52 in Canada, 58 in Israel, 42 in West Germany and 10,728 in the United States”. For many years, America has been regarded as one of the world’s most perilous and ferocious countries in the world. The death rate caused by active gun shooters in the US is extraordinary: “since 1968, more Americans have died from gunfire than died in … all the wars of this country 's history”. Hence why public ownership of guns should be abolished in the USA. Can you imagine to what extent the death rate in America has increased by now?

Read More

More about Essay On Gun Control In Australia

Related Topics

Open Document