ipl-logo

Should We Blame The Non-Vegetarian?

1343 Words6 Pages

Can ideological vegetarians blame the non-vegetarian for slaughtering animals for food?
Everyone in this world has their own preference and rights to choose their food. Some people have interests on particular kinds of food whereas some do not prefer to eat at all. The food culture of a person varies from one to another due to some factors like; the geographical location they live, the culture and the society they belong to, religion they follow and personal likes, dislikes on food in terms of smell, taste and color. Slaughtering animals for food has become a controversial topic since the past few decades; some religious perspectives and personal opinions of people have interfered into food culture, considering that killing animals is too radical and brutal. In my point of view, vegetarians cannot blame the non-vegetarians for killing animals. No major religion in this world has forbidden killing animals for food; they have permitted mankind to consume animal meat for several reasons. According to some religious perspectives, killing animals is considered as a sin and it’s persuasive enough to support their claim. But, there are lots of ideological groups, who criticize the …show more content…

To persuade their claim, they argue, stating that, ‘non-vegetarians consume the meat of dead animals, where the vegetarians consume live and fresh plants.’ But, they argue saying that slaughtering animals is brutal and a major sin compared to killing plants which have less sense. There is no logic or ethic in their claim to blame the non-vegetarians for killing animals. In my point view, the person who murders an innocent weak person, who is deaf and blind, should get more punishment than a person who has murdered a normal, strong civilian. How can killing an animal become unethical if killing a plant is

Show More
Related
1931 Words | 8 Pages

Growing up with a pescetarian mother (eating no meat other than fish) and omnivore father has not been the easiest of tasks. My mother likes to think she is holier-than-thou because of her diet, while my father just sits and laughs in the corner while eating a stack of ribs. When I read Alan Richmands excerpt “Fork It Over: My Beef with Vegans” I identified with his experiences with vegans because they were what I had experienced with my pescetarian mother over the years. Despite non meat eaters trying to convert meat eaters through persistent ranting, describing in great detail how the animals are raised and slaughtered (guilt tripping), and by trying to demonstrate that food made without animal products can taste just as good as those made with animal products a person can still make the decision to eat meat and enjoy it.

Read More
699 Words | 3 Pages

Is eating meat a detrimental threat to the environment? This debate over meat’s involvement in the global warming crisis was what inspired Nicolette Hahn Niman to write, “The Carnivore’s Dilemma.” Niman hoped writing, “The Carnivore’s Dilemma,” would cause her audience to understand that eating meat, raised on traditional farms, was a superior alternative to vegetarianism. Niman supported her claim by explaining how industrialized farms and vegetarians produce more of the three greenhouse gases that caused global warming, than that produced by traditional farms. Niman’s article fell short of being effective due to flaws in her supporting evidence and conclusion.

Read More
1009 Words | 5 Pages

Summary In this article “Against Meat” Jonathan Safran Foer describes his personal experience with struggling whether he eats meat or not and what he went through to become a vegetarian, his main reason was he didn’t want animals to suffer. Foer had a lot of influence in his life, starting with his grandmother who he considered her as a role model he loved her passion with food, although she had one recipe

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

This short story explains and questions how people find eating animals morally acceptable. Steiner 's short story explains that whenever people think these animals are being treated respectfully they are being ignorant to the fact of how these animals are truly treated; Steiner brings up the fact of how an animals typical horrid life is and how it transitions from its horrid life to being killed by a butcher in a matter of seconds. Moreover, Steiner also adheres to the topic of how unacceptable, it is to kill these animals just for human consumption. Steiner 's purpose in writing this short story is to display to us the fact that eating any animal is not only wrong, but it is just downright unacceptable as it is mass murder of these innocent animals. Finally, Steiner tries to define at his best, what a strict vegan truly

Read More
727 Words | 3 Pages

A reader's response of The Most dangerous Game Characterization: The antagonist of the story, General Zaroff, doesn't come in until the 4th page of the story, when his butler answers the door. General Zaroff, invites the protagonist in for a meal, they sit and tell stories, of hunting, something they both have in common, General Zaroff tells stories of his military background. Due to this we can assume he is a round character, a man with military background, who just wants to spend the rest of his life in peace and hunting on his private island, but that is far from the truth. He has the heads of the animals on his wall, from this we can infer that he is a skilled hunter and is proud of it.as the protaginist and Zaroff talk Zaroff tells him

Read More
1302 Words | 6 Pages

In the articles “An Animals Place,” by Michael Pollan, and “The Omnivore’s Delusion: Against the Agri-intellectuals,” by Blake Hurst, the controversial methods of farming in today’s society are examined. Modern farming methods are a relevant topic of discussion because the foods that people consume have a direct impact on their health, therefore they should be aware of the procedures that farming methods employ. Pollan and Hurst have differing beliefs on farming methods, but similar interests in the environment, people, and animals. In the article “An Animals Place,” the author, Michael Pollan sheds light on the barbaric institution of American meat-packing.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

The Impact of Humor As Leo Rosten, an American humorist and author states, “Humor is the affectionate communication of insight” Humor is an intelligent way to enforce an argument to your audience. With the employment of humor, the authors are able to persuade their readers into understanding, and sometimes agreeing with their opinions. Humor allows authors to have the insight about their topic thus, giving the author credibility and zealousness. In Laura Fraser's essay, “Why I Stopped Being a Vegetarian”, she employs the element of humor to strengthen her essay in a myriad of ways.

Read More
528 Words | 3 Pages

This is seen through her inability to display and consider opposing views, through her one-sided style and tone of writing, and through her incapability to present sound and uniform evidence throughout her essay. First, Garretson’s inability to consider opposing views, ultimately, affects the strength of her argument and lessens the credibility of the points she provides. Second, although Garretson’s writing may be effective and strong, the partial style and tone that she expresses seems to help reinforce a tactic that does not rely on facts, statistics and so forth, but rather, relies on emotional appeals to pity, fear, and trust, as a way to help sway the reader into trusting and believing her points on vegetarianism. Lastly, the evidence that Garretson supplies proves to not demonstrate soundness and uniformity. As a result, the claims that she makes cannot be considered seriously to demonstrate her points on vegetarianism effectively.

Read More
1329 Words | 6 Pages

In the United States, according to the North American Meat Institute, the average man will consume about 6.9 oz of meat in a day, while a women will consume about 4.4 oz. Meat companies in America produced 25.8 billion pounds of beef and 38.4 pounds of chicken just in 2013 alone. People walk into grocery stores and purchase meat but never think twice about the environment their food, or the workers that handle the animals, were in. Upton Sinclair exposed the industry with “The Jungle” in 1906, people were now fully aware of what was sometimes in the meat, this lead to the Federal Meat Inspection Act of 1906. Therefore, once the 1980s came along, companies relocated to rural areas and became a non-union workforce.

Read More
324 Words | 2 Pages

In An Animal’s Place, Michael Pollan describes the growing acknowledgement of animal rights, particularly America’s decision between vegetarianism and meat-eating. However, this growing sense of sentiment towards animals is coupled with a growing sense of brutality in farms and science labs. According to Pollan, the lacking respect for specific species of animals lies in the fact that they are absent from human’s everyday lives; enabling them to avoid acknowledgment of what they are doing when partaking in brutality towards animals. He presents arguments for why vegetarianism would make sense in certain instances and why it would not and ultimately lead to the decision of eating-meat while treating the animals fairly in the process. Pollan

Read More
796 Words | 4 Pages

In the article, “Is It Possible to be a Conscientious Meat Eater”, the authors argue that processed meat can greatly affect the many things in our everyday life. Sunaura and Alexander’s argument is significantly unreliable because of the certain professions both authors yield. As stated in the article “Sunaura is an artist, writer, and activist in Oakland.” “Alexander’s profession is studying philosophy, and ethics in Athens, Georgia.” This shows that neither of them are qualified to argue in the subject of conscientious meat eaters.

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

What is Veganism? A way of life that adopts a Vegan diet and believes harming animals for meat or products is wrong. Yet, people say vegans are the inhumane and unreasonable ones. Think about where the animals come from. They are not grazing around in a green field.

Read More
768 Words | 4 Pages

In today’s world, there is a division among the people in the world regarding whether or not it is ethical to eat meat. After researching about eating meat and vegetarianism, I have come to the conclusion that it is indeed ethical to eat meat in today’s society. Sure, eating meat might have its drawbacks, but I have found that the benefits of eating meat far outweigh the negatives of eating it. Eating meat not only helps improve people’s health, but it also helps strengthen our economy and it has little difference in the environmental impact that involves in the farming of vegetables. Eating too much of anything usually results in a negative outcome.

Read More
1421 Words | 6 Pages

The meat packing industry disregards animal’s emotions and their rights all together by the malicious treatment of animals. The way animals are being treated is highly unfair. Being slaughtered for their body parts and suffering just to be used for protein or an asset to humans is unbearable. An animal’s life is at equal values to a human and deserve the same rights as

Read More
1227 Words | 5 Pages

On the one hand, some people are favorable for killing animals. It has many opinions why they have accepted. Their reasons with cruelty make them get many benefits such as nutrient, knowledge, safety, prevention, and money. The first reason for killing animals is humans killed them for consuming such as pork made from pigs, beef made from cows, and lamp made from sheep. Human’s life exists to cause by plants and animals.

Read More

More about Should We Blame The Non-Vegetarian?

Related Topics

Open Document