Besonen, Mark. 'Drug Testing For Welfare Recipients: Pro'. 2014. Theconcordian.org. 30 Oct. 2015.
Welfare was created during the days of the Great Depression as a temporary assistance to those who suffered from an economic collapse. Presently, welfare for some has become a long-term commitment. Welfare could be seen as an agreement between the people in need of assistance and the people who provide for them so drug testing is a way to prove recipients hold up their end of the deal. Since employees are required to be drug tested for their job, it is fair that recipients receiving benefits are drug tested for welfare. This article provides insight on the pro side of drug testing. Since the author is a conservative, he is a little bias.
Carpenter,
…show more content…
There are both pros and cons of drug testing. Besides the fact it could save money by removing drug users, drug testing could influence the lower class to stay off drugs. Because many are required to be drug tested for their job, people who are for drug testing believe it is fair to have recipients tested for welfare. Cons of drug testing are that testing is discriminating and testing could punish children for their parent’s choices. This article is useful because it provides two sides to testing. Unfortunately, this article is short and does not completely cover the pros and cons of …show more content…
The underlining pro of mandatory drug testing is it will potentially terminate the families who abuse the system. However, the cons of drug testing are that it will create additional cost to test recipients, violate a person’s privacy, and take money from other programs to pay for the tests. This article is very informative because it provides both the pros and the cons of mandatory drug testing of welfare recipients. This article is useful to my paper because it provides facts without bias and is supported by the National Institute of Mental Health Social Work Research Development Center on Poverty, Risk, and Mental