Power structure
Rural school funding inequality is fueled, primarily, by state and local government. Local government and state structure for rural communities is upheld by less revenue on property taxes and how the state can provide funding to public schools in rural areas.
For example, there is additional funding for schools that are determined isolated. Additional funding is allocated by either a sliding scale, size of school district/ school, and legislature discretion. When funding is applied to rural public schools, caps are assessed which are based off the district’s size or school size (Evans, 2020).
According to Tieken and Montgomery, 2021 “Segregated poverty also lowers property wealth, which erodes educational funds and can compromise the quality of education a child receives” (pg. 8). Local policies for rural school financing reflect on how property taxes are collected in that county. If the property taxes generate a lack in rural school financing, then the state is responsible to provide financial stability. The barriers identified are financial limitations, regulation of how funds are applied and determined, and inequity within education for rural communities.
Priority issues
…show more content…
Public meetings will allow community members to know and understand how rural public schools are financed.
Super Intendant in the rural community shares information about grant funding to school staff so that grants are applied to that fits the needs of the students in rural communities to improve educational development.
Federal money for education will be allocated to fit the needs of students in rural areas to improve, educate, and encourage human development for sufficiency. Federal funds would be up to the state so that district and school size would not create barriers.