ipl-logo

Ethical Issues In Ww2 Research Paper

441 Words2 Pages

On August 6, 1954, during World War II, the United States dropped the World’s first atomic bomb. Three days later another one was dropped. The effects were devastating. So many Japanese people lost their life and their cities were destroyed. It is unethical and morally wrong that this happened.
It can even be considered against the law. For example, in the 1920s the League of Nations signed and brought into effect the Geneva Protocol, which banned the use in war of chemical weapons. The United States went against this act when it subjected Japan to the known effects of widespread radiation poisoning.
II. Body:
1st Main Point: The mass murdering of Japanese citizens was unnecessary when other steps could have been taken. Harmless, innocent civilians were killed, the subsequent radiation made cities unlivable, and the environment was harmed horribly. These actions that were taken weren’t decisive in Japan's surrender. …show more content…

Within months about 140,000 people were killed when the United States bombed Hiroshima. Then three days later when the US bombed Nagasaki there was 80,000 deaths. This mass murdering is unethical. There has to be a limit to what is acceptable in war and what is not. As United States Senator and former Vietnam prisoner of war John McCain has stated, we treat prisoners of war humanely to preserve our own humanity and in the expectation that our captured soldiers will be treated in kind. Weapons of mass destruction are banned for similar reasons. For years, it has been generally agreed on about when a war is just and how to be fought. The use of atomic bombs violated these principles. The direct targets were civilians and non-military installations and the environmental damage was not

Show More
Related
424 Words | 2 Pages

The Bombing of Hiroshima The bombing of Hiroshima was the right thing to do due to the military lives that were going to be lost if the bomb did not get dropped, America also wanted to impress Russia or intimidate them by dropping it and the president saw this opportunity to make japan surrender as well. This all supports the main point on why it was the right thing to do but many to all Japanese say otherwise Lots of soldiers lost their lives because of the conflict with japan, in document B, it states,”123,000 Japanese and Americans killed each other”. Paul Fussell, a WWII soldier also stated, ”war is immoral, war is cruel”. This is speaking for all the soldiers in the war or most of them, this also means that he doesn’t like war and it would

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

Today, Many historians argue that America should not have dropped the bomb on Japan. People believe that is was morally incorrect for Americans to completely destroy two cities in Japan with many civilians. Even though dropping the atomic bombs was a violation of International Law, it was justified because it saved more lives than killed, it was the only way the Japanese would surrender and it made America more powerful. While the dropping of the bomb seems like it killed so many people, it actually saved more lives.

Read More
866 Words | 4 Pages

Dr. Jekyll and Courtney Davidson would agree with the quote “We’ve all got both light and dark inside us, What matters is the part we choose to act on.” Dr. Jekyll and Davidson both are good people and they both had a share of an evil turn. Dr. Jekyll was a brilliant scientist that did a lot for his community but a dark side took over him and he chose to act on it.. Davidson had a dark side take over her when she began hazing during summer camp. So I believe that both of the characters would agree with the quote from Sirius Black from Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix.

Read More
312 Words | 2 Pages

Consistently, Japan tortured and beat American prisoners of war, and blatantly ignored the international laws of warfare. Not only were the bombs used to punish Japan, they were also used to save American lives. The bombs “shorten[ed] the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans” (Truman).

Read More
345 Words | 2 Pages

Therefore knowing how the Japanese soldiers think about surrendering, the millions of lives saved by ending the war quickly and shortly, and the countless warnings given to the Japanese, I think dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was warranted and

Read More
602 Words | 3 Pages

Although it was inhumane and horrific, we were justified in dropping the atomic bombs because American soldiers were being tortured, American bodies were disrespected after death, and the bombs ended the war preventing more American casualties. The first reason that America was justified in dropping the atomic bombs is that American soldiers that were captured in Japan were being tortured. When Japanese soldiers captured American soldiers, they needed some way of trying to get them to give up valuable information because the U.S soldiers wouldn’t just tell them for no reason. So they began torturing them in hopes they’d crack. Document 2 showed the numerous

Read More
617 Words | 3 Pages

In the year of 1945, the U.S. had dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima, causing a lot of damage. The U.S. was justified when dropping the atomic bomb on Hiroshima because the Japanese was already ready to surrender and the japanese was already defeated, so there was no point. The bomb killed so many lives that shouldn't have been taken. Thousands of innocent people died or got wounded very badly, which was very unnecessary. Some people even became really sick as well, which was completely unnecessary.

Read More
1403 Words | 6 Pages

The use of the atomic bomb when strategically compared to a land invasion, in fact prevented the loss of any U.S. soldiers lives, as well as the death of many Japanese citizens. Excerpts from “Three Narratives of our Humanity” by John W, debates whether or not the nuclear bombing was necessary to shock the Japanese into surrender and describes how the Japanese recall the war through a lens of their own victimization. An excerpt claims, “it is argued that the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima was necessary to shock the Japanese to surrender”. This presents a compelling argument supporting the ethicality of the bombings through its logical and strategic worth.

Read More
498 Words | 2 Pages

On August 6th, 1945, The United States bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki killing many people. The president at the time, President Truman said that he only wanted to use the bomb in military warfare because it would hurt women and children. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was morally incorrect because the Japanese were ready to surrender, it was a crime against humanity, and it affected their physical self. The bombing at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unsuitable because the Japanese were ready to surrender.

Read More
1232 Words | 5 Pages

It also had long lasting effects that still impact Japanese lives. In the newspaper by Jack Doherty headlined ¨Atomic Bomb Fury Hits Japan¨ after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the president said, ¨It was to spare the Japanese people from utter destruction.¨ Yet, look where it has gone and how much damage it had cost Japan. I encourage you to not listen to these statements as if they were true, and right the wrongs the atomic bombs have done to Japan by unjustifying the act and telling others to do so as

Read More
513 Words | 3 Pages

If the atomic bomb were not dropped the war would have lasted longer, ending in more lives lost and wasted materials. Another reason that dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was justified is, the Japanese had already done so much damage to the US with pearl harbor, They had it coming with damage done to them. “A Kamikaze Pilot's Manual” (Document #9) In the three pictures you can see the horrifying pearl harbor attack summed up in only 3 images, before, during, and the aftermath.

Read More
209 Words | 1 Pages

Although others may think differently, this mass killing was not necessary or justified. Japan was almost completely defenseless. According to the document Was The Atomic Bomb Of Japan Necessary, Dwight D.Eisenhower left something clear. “Japan was already defeated and dropping the atomic bomb was completely unnecessary” he said. The document also stated that the Japanese

Read More
1840 Words | 8 Pages

Was America Justified in dropping the atom bomb on Hiroshima in August 1945? On August 6th, 1945 at 8:16 AM, a great yet horrific event in history occurred. This event is known as the dropping of the atom bomb on the city of Hiroshima, Japan, the event that would begin and end the pain and suffering of millions. The atom bomb was dropped by an American B-29 Superfortress bomber named Enola Gay and

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

The U.S. government did the right thing when they dropped the atomic bomb on Japan. The dropping of the bomb was necessary and justified because the Japanese first bomb Pearl Harbor. The Japanese military was killing thousands of Americans and showed no sign of surrender. During World War II the American bombed two Japanese cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Japanese military was growing stronger and showed no sign of surrendering. Just a few weeks before the dropping of the atomic bombs 123,000 Japanese and Americans killed each other in Okinawa.

Read More
1422 Words | 6 Pages

United States’ Relations with Russia: A New Cold War? Merriam-Webster defines the term Cold War as “a conflict over ideological differences carried on by methods short of sustained overt military action and usually without breaking off diplomatic relations”. Google’s definition is perhaps more illuminating because it adds the dimensions of threats and propaganda to the definition. The political environment today is vastly different than it was during the cold war that extended from 1945 to the early 1990s.

Read More

More about Ethical Issues In Ww2 Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document