ipl-logo

Euphemism In Darn's Oh, My God

722 Words3 Pages

Within the typical Christian home the abundance of tabooed words becomes much of a burden. You can hardly exclaim dismay or frustration without dishonoring all that is good and holy. Darn is a euphemism for damn, shoot a euphemism for shit and even butt is a euphemism for ass (the acceptable word being bottom). Nonetheless, the most horrific utterance possible is without a doubt “Oh my god”. This direct violation of the third commandment is absolute heresy. If one uses this phrase it's viewed as the defilement of God and his "holy name" however, if used by, for instance, an atheist can it really be a verbal denouncement of piety when the "offender" themselves holds no value of the subject? The phrases "Oh my god" and "Oh, my God", although …show more content…

The essence of possession creates a relationship between the speaker and the subject. Through claiming this God as your own, responsibilities arise, responsibilities requiring devotion to the teachings of the religion. This is unfortunately no simple commitment. The weekly appearance at a church service becomes mandatory, saying grace before meals is standard procedure and “Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain” becomes your reality. Countless hymns lift up the name of God, rejoicing in the fact that he belongs to you and vice versa but once again verbal affirmation means nothing. Religion requires absolute resignation of what is desired for ones’ self, that being replaced by the devotion to a/the God. Romans 12:1 says that “Therefore, I urge you, brothers and sisters, in view of God’s mercy, to offer your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to God—this is your true and proper worship.” (NIV) The submission to the Almighty constitutes the denial of self, therefore devaluing the individual and their worldly life. In Christianity the ultimate goal is to reach Heaven. If that is your ambition fully claim God as your own and reserve your personalized room in the heavenly mansion. Affirm that your “Oh my god” is not one of “sin”, but rather an “Oh, my God” declaring

Show More
Related
1337 Words | 6 Pages

Perhaps the right-wing extremists began and had intensified following some precedent city and domestic bombings such as the Ruby Ridge, Waco, and Oklahoma. The manner in which the federal government security agencies responded these incidents, in which constitutional rights of women and children were violated, might have caused anti-government wars especially by extremists. In the Ruby Ridge case of August 21, 1992, Randy Weaver who was a white separatist was being targeted by the federal government under the allegations that he sold guns to drug traffickers and failed to report to the court as instructed. The US Marshals and the FBI invaded his home in different occasions killing his wife and 14-year-old son. Waco bombing of 1993 began when

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

In order to emphasize God’s contempt for the audience, Jonathan Edwards utilizes inflammatory diction and comparisons of God’s anger to a bow and arrow and “black clouds” to instill fear in the audience so that they will accept God as their savior, provoking a religious revival. Throughout the sermon, Edwards utilizes “fiery” phrases such as “furnace of wrath”, “wrath…burns like fire”, and “glowing flames of the wrath of God” in order to establish a connection between God’s fury and a burning fire, reaffirming the reality of going to hell, as hell is commonly associated with fire. Because fires are also very devastating and unpredictable, Edwards emphasizes the power and degree of God’s disdain and his ability to cause drastic change at unexpected times, making God’s patience seem fragile.

Read More
954 Words | 4 Pages

This nicer tone, written almost like a sales pitch, convinces them that they do just need to ask for forgiveness and accept Christ. An example of this aggressive tone is, “How might all the rest of the congregation life up a lamentable and bitter cry over him! But alas! instead of one, how many is it likely will remember this discourse in hell? And it would be a wonder if some that are now present should not be in hell in a very short time, even before this year is out” (11).

Read More
1282 Words | 6 Pages

Through connecting psychological principles with accentuated rhetoric, Jonathan Edward’s delivers “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” initially stirring the First Great Awakening. The basis of his sermon relies on a mix of imagery and rhetoric with an impassive delivery to condemn those currently who do not have the spirit of God striving within them. He further sentences those who resist and sin, by speaking of God’s sovereignty with severity, using graphic metaphoric language, thus hyperboles descriptions of God and the fate of the congregation. On his pulpit, Edwards portrays a God himself, who harshly opposes all human order for holding a sense of security, for these efforts inspire rebellion and self-reliance, which leads to blind

Read More
2092 Words | 9 Pages

Why should I sanctify His name? The Almighty, the eternal and terrible Master of the Universe, chose to be silent. What was there to thank Him for?” (Elizer,33). He is only describing what God truly meant for him by Gods lack of

Read More
179 Words | 1 Pages

Sinners in the hands of an Angry God is written by Jonathan Edwards who was "one of the last great Puritan Minister". He is the speaker of the sermon Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, and an American revivalist preacher, philosopher, and Congregationalist Protestant theologian. The occasion he is saying this to the people is after a fellow pastor invited him to preach to the men and women of this church. The audiences that he addressed are the men and women of the church he was preaching at. The purpose of this is to teach the listeners about the horrors of hell, the dangers of sin and the terror of not joining God.

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God is a sermon that was delivered by Jonathan Edwards, a “New Lights” preacher during the Great Awakening during the mid 1700s. To begin his sermon, Edwards has a very critical, unregretful and informative tone, but later there is a tone shift, in which he is then encouraging and hopeful. Edwards’ chose words with negative connotations in order to terrify his audience. By doing so, the audience was more likely to listen and be attentive because he was explaining to them why God was angry with them and that they were going to hell. He also continues to explain that it’s inevitable for them to go to hell if they continue living the way they do.

Read More
210 Words | 1 Pages

Similes are implemented throughout the sermon to denote the abomination the the wrath of

Read More
816 Words | 4 Pages

For instance we can see the outrage when he mention, “It is sinful in the extreme for you to make voluntary submission.” Another time the audience can see that he is angry is when he uses the phrase ,“And worse than all, you tamely submit while your lords tear your wives from your embraces and defile them before your eyes. In the name of God, we ask you, are you men? Where is the blood of your fathers? Has it all run out of your veins?

Read More
1229 Words | 5 Pages

In the Book of Mormon Alma says in chapter 42 verse 26 “And thus God bringeth about his great and eternal purposes, which were prepared from the foundation of the world. And thus cometh about the salvation and the redemption of men, and also the destruction of misery.” Religion is the basis of morality which is the encouragement to live a virtuous life that will, in the end, bring about happiness. It is important to have a good sense of the doctrine and principles of religion. Religion brings about structure and guidance to prepare humankind for exaltation and eternal happiness bringing everyone joy and purpose.

Read More
1551 Words | 7 Pages

However, the general consensus can compromise that indeed religion is derived from humanity. The practice of worship, in simpler terms, implements an objective to all of societies. Not only does it provide the satisfaction of mankind’s inception but it provides them a purpose. That purpose- that motivation- can range from following the 10 Commandments to spreading peace and love.

Read More
415 Words | 2 Pages

Literal sense: In Psalm 22, someone cries out to God and pleads for Him to save him from torments of his enemies. Progressively through the passage, he changes his tone. It goes from angry and negative to positive. He then thanks God for rescuing him.

Read More
920 Words | 4 Pages

Although we knew a bunch of swears, we always had the wrong definition. While my current friends would talk about these words at the lunch table, we carried our discussion over to the soccer field where my dad coached. My dad has always been laid back about swearing but this was one of the only incidents that he got mad mainly because he was embarrassed due to the other coach hearing me swear. One of the most common things we would do is three versus three on miniature nets and during one of them, I accidentally blurted out the word. My dad yelled but almost laughed mainly because he had no idea how I knew this word.

Read More
404 Words | 2 Pages

Rhetorical Analysis of Jonathan edwards’s Sinners in the hand of an angry god: jeremiad Jonathan edwards, is known as one of the most important religious figures of the great awakening, edwards became known for his zealous sermon “sinners at the hand of an angry god”. During his sermon he implies that if his congregation does not repent to christ they are in “danger of great wrath and infinite misery”. Throughout this sermon edwards uses literary devices such as strong diction, powerful syntax and juxtaposition to save his congregation from eternal damnation. Throughout Edwards’s sermon the use of turgid diction is exceedingly prevalent.

Read More
1719 Words | 7 Pages

It claims that this religion instills guilt for the feelings and aspirations that are inherent to humanity while promoting a moral system that consistently goes against the instincts and nature of mankind. In seeking moral excellence and “the ideals of humanity,” Nietzsche asserts that mankind loses its instinctive desire to grow and become powerful and, therefore, becomes corrupt (Nietzsche 6). To simplify, corruption can be defined as straying away from innate feelings that encourage growth and yearn for power. Nietzsche uses the concept of transvaluation of values to reiterate his argument that everything that Christianity suggested is good is actually evil and vice versa. Nietzsche sees Christianity as nihilistic, stressing that the values and traditions leave people yearning for redemption that they will never be able to achieve on their own.

Read More

More about Euphemism In Darn's Oh, My God

Related Topics

Open Document