More handpicked essays just for you.
Theory about parenting styles
Theory about parenting styles
How are children effected by different parenting styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In 2011, Peggy Orenstein published Cinderella Ate My Daughter to examine how princess culture impacted girlhood. “What Makes Girls Girls?” is a chapter in this book that delves into the implications of sexual difference and whether or not it is rooted in biology. By studying various research projects conducted by professionals, Orenstein discovers that, ultimately, a child’s environment plays a key role in behavior. To pose the question of whether the concept of gender is inherent, Orenstein references several examples that have sparked a considerable amount of discussion about how a child’s gender expression is molded by upbringing.
She backs this up with a study by Vanessa Lobue and Judy DeLoache in which children age seven months to five years were asked to choose between a pink or blue object and it wasn’t until around two and a half that girls preference for pink became obvious. Robb then includes many quotes from Megan Fulcher, associate professor of psychology at Washington and Lee University. She uses Fulcher’s idea that gender-specific toys marketing leads to hindered learn, such as in motor skills. This article fits into my research paper because it shows that stores should rid of gender-specific marketing because it harms children and it shows that business were able to do it in the
Moncada, Jeremy: Toy companies should have a moral obligation to consider and realize the social impact of their toys especially barbie dolls. Based off the "Barbie Doll" poem, barbie dolls are teaching girls what it is like to become a grown woman. Society uses barbie dolls to let young girls know that women should be thin, do all the house work, and be attractive. I believe this isn't a good thing because this will put a lot of social pressure for the girl as she is growing up. As for boys and the toy companies, their toys send out a message that men should be strong and aggressive.
Burak defines gender socialization as “the process of interaction through which we learn the gender norms of our culture and acquire a sense of ourselves as feminine, masculine, or even androgynous” (Burack, 1). According to Burack, people of different genders behave differently not due to biological factors, but due to socialization that teaches individuals to behave in a particular way in order to belong to a certain gender. For example, women may tend to be nurturing, not because they are biologically programed to be caretakers, but as a result of society teaching them through toys and media to act as mothers. In this way, gender becomes a performance based on expectations rather than natural behaviors or biology, a phenomenon called “doing
Pollitt in her article entitled, "Why Boys Don't Play with Dolls" describes a very powerful social movement in history that has flourished in many organizations. This was the Feminist Movement that spawned reform in politics, the workplace, but has failed in the most significant institution in American civilization, the family. Since the family is where kids are primarily socialized into the individuals that they will become if the family fails to adhere to gender neutrality than the whole Feminist essence has failed. It can be assumed the movement did trigger a change in conducts, where women were afforded equal rights under the laws, but a change in attitude has not been seen in the family. Even when parents realize that it is wrong to assume
The key aspects surrounding this theory emphasize the genetic and hormonal factors present during the prenatal period which ultimately influence how one is socialized. Parents observe whether their child is a boy or girl and shape certain opportunities and environments to fit this biological essence- it is difficult to separate the two and one must exist for the other to occur. Despite evidence supporting the biological and social interplay, others have argued why children may adopt non-traditional gender identities despite parents socializing against
The requirements our growing children face daily is absolutely absurd, and the scary part of it is that we don’t even realize we are doing it. We don’t realize the signals being sent to our children, because they have become such a regular part of society. Based off of the article by Lise Eliot, “Special Issue His Brain, Her Brain: The truth about boys and girls” even though there are biological differences between genders, the biggest factor heavily relies on the culture and upbringing in which the child is raised. Studies have proven that boys have larger brains and heads than girls do. However, girl’s brains finish growing earlier than boy’s brains.
More and more and more the babies learns to perceive objects as distinct and separate from them and at the same time make a distinction from them and also start to separates from the women body. At the age of six months the baby understoond he or she is the individual. Further in the development the of child discover the sex differences between being a girl or boy (Beauvoir, 1983). The boys treated this way because they are getting prepared for their long path before them, and to the pride in his manhood that they are learned to feel (Beauvoir, 1983)After four years of age the girls are in an advantaged position comparing to
The documentary “The Pinks and the Blues” and the podcast “Can a Child be Raised Free of Gender Stereotypes” discuss the unconscious gender stereotypes and assumptions that our culture places upon children. Children are enculturated with ideas about who they should be, how they should think and behave, and this enculturation has distinct effects upon the child psychology and way of living in the world. The viewer is left with the question: Is it possible to raise a child without gender stereotypes? “The Pinks and the Blues” states that gendered treatment of children begins within 24 hours of the child’s birth. Descriptors for male infants and female infants were different, with boys being labeled as big, strong, and alert while girls were labeled as being delicate, petite, and inattentive.
Narrowed eyes of a small child stare into lifeless glass orbs embedded into the face of a doll, waiting for them to blink. Later, the same child spies from a hidden location, trying to catch sight of a teddy bear’s movement, no matter how miniscule. This experience is relatable to every American child who had access to a television since 1995– but why? The answer is simple: the Toy Story tetralogy. If a movie can inspire kids to set up elaborate plans to catch their toys coming to life, it begs the question: what else could they influence them to do?
Article of the Week Response Toy manufactures are being sexist by promoting gender-biased toys that build stereotypes later in life. They are creating toys specifically designed towards the stereotypical idea of what a girl should be like and what a boy should be like. For example, the naeyc wrote an article interviewing expert toy designer Jeffrey Smith about gender-biased toys. Smith says that toys known as girl toys typically focus on physical attractiveness and beauty, as well as nurturing and domestic skills.
I don't think that toy companies have a moral obligation to consider the social impact of their toys. There are so many toy companies that just make new toys and sell them to make money. All toy companies care about are whether they are making enough money or no. Like the in article "How Do Children's Toys Affect Gender Roles" it says that there are certain toys that are for girl and certain ones for boys, so kids have to get certain toys because of their gender. Toy companies just make toys for each gender and they don't make gender neutral toys for both boys and girls.
Yes, toy companies must consider the social impact of their toys to guide and control the future generation that would currently be children. In the article "How Do Children's Toys Affect Gender Roles?" by Amy Pearson, she says "these toys show children what it means to be a man or woman through pretend play. " This presents the idea that children learn about what their gender should be like as an adult. Companies understand this and try to guide them along that path of a good future. Pearson says that "toys such as trucks show boys how to do the heavy lifting."
These studies suggest that children observe gender stereotypes at an early age unintentionally. Since children’s brains are constantly soaking in new information about the world around them, they have to do so in a way that they are seemingly most comfortable. Studies show that children are most comfortable learning from people who are actively in their lives and attractive movie and TV
While the girl type toys encourage them to grow to be a house mom or wife and to stay in the feminine role. As a result, this leads to children at young age to be set in the way society view a certain type gender, even though that child might have other
