When scientists are doing researches about evolution or ecology, they usually use ‘hypothesis’ to describe the scientific questions. This means, they will assume some hypothesis that related to what they are researching on. Then they will do some corresponding experiments to reject the wrong hypothesis, so in the end, the one survive will be the fact. This method is combined with deduction and induction, and commonly used in science.
The whole concept of evolution is just composed of some hypotheses. There is a lot of negative evidence about evolution. This means the evolution we’ve knew about may not be real. What I am saying is: there should be no evidence to reject a FACT. If evolution is a fact, then why there are so many things cannot