The subject of Allan Richarz’s “Bureaucrats remain fixated on protecting kids from that terrifying condition known as ‘childhood’” is the style of parenting expected in Canada compared to Japan. In the title of the article, Richarz included the words “bureaucrats remain fixated on protecting kids”. This is expanded upon in the third paragraph where Allan writes “children are inculcated on an upbringing of helicopter parenting, fostered by a regime of smothering government nanny-stateism.” The phrase “helicopter parenting” and how children are “inculcated”, the act of instilling something by persistent instruction, by it proves that the subject is the style of parenting expected in Canada because a helicopter parent is a parent who closely monitors their child’s experiences and actions. Furthermore, the phrase “latest contretemps over children not receiving 24/7 supervision in Canada” shows that in Canada, …show more content…
In the final section of the article, Richarz appeals to the emotion of fear by entitling the section “A generation of anxiety-ridden children”. This appeals to fear because “anxiety-ridden” is a phrase that has a negative meaning and would incite a sense of fear, especially when describing a generation of children. Furthermore, in this section Allan Richarz describes children with phrases such as “fearful of their own shadow”, that something “deprives children of important learning experiences”, “helplessness” and “smothered and fearful.” These are all phrases that have a negative meaning and things that no parent ever wants for their child. Finally, in the concluding sentence and title, Allan Richarz incites fear through describing childhood as a “terrifying and life-threatening condition”. In conclusion, Allan Richarz constructs the final section of his piece to appeal towards the emotion of fear or