Also it seems that the late politicians of the Roman empire had lost sight of what was most important: their empire. However, they only cared about how much power they had. Many of them plotted on how they could overthrow the emperor. They even fought each other over it when the time and energy could have been put toward fighting their enemies. They had only cared about power and money, even though that was something the Romans were running low
Suetonius wrote about the life of Cesar Augustus, the emperor of Rome. Suetonius tried to justify his dictatorship to the people of Rome, so that future generations would have no contradictory ideas towards the government. In this way, Rome would maintain peace, and people would follow and take as an example the government of Cesar Augustus as the best of all. The solution of Suetonius was to give a good image to the readers with the actions and facts that the emperor did at that time, “Found it on brick, but left it on marble” (Suetonius,115). Suetonius made the emperor look like a perfect person, who governed rigidly but obtained an efficient and honest administration.
During the Pax Romana the Roman Empire grew and prospered. Before this time period of great rulers Rome had a lot of corrupt rulers. There were five incredible emperors known as Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antonius Pius, and Marcus Aurelius (Spielvogel 292). Trajan was known as the best ruler. He was a successful and powerful leader.
A World History Article on Augustus says, “This time his subject is the Pax Romana, that period of relative peace and stability enjoyed by some 70 million subjects of the Roman empire, beginning with the Principate of Augustus (27 BC) and ending with the death of Marcus Aurelius (AD 180). Never before had such a broad cross-section of the world's population lived in peace over so many generations.” (Gabriel) What this is saying is that Augustus brought a remarkable moment in the history of the Roman World by bringing absolute peace which benefited the community and had lasted after his death which other leaders kept
In this essay, I'll delve into the life and reign of Emperor
The emperors weren’t liked. The abused power of the Praetorian Guard, leaded to the unfair selection of many disreputable emperors and the assassination of those not favoured by the Guard. The ones that were assassinated had short reigns, usually only lasting 3-6 years. For a fact, many of the emperors took their power by killing the previous emperor. They were so focused on power that they didn’t notice how bad their empire, land, and care of people had become.
(37) This demonstrates two traits of Alexus’s imperial character. One was that he was highly intelligent and ingenious, and the other was that two he was humane and merciful. This shows in Doceianus, Alexius’s cousins reaction: “When he did learn of Alexius’s humane treatment of the man with his humanity, and his artifice, he [Doceianus] was overcome with joy.”
The Severan Dynasty was ruled by a total of five emperors, hence the nickname Year of the Five Emperors. The emperors who ruled includes Septimius Severus, Caracalla, Macrinus, Elagabalus, and Alexander Severus. Prior to Septimius’ death, he passed the honor of co-emperor to his two sons. However, his first son, Caracalla, killed Geta.
Nero didn't approve of Stoic philosophers, therefore, he had exiled Gaius. Gaius was well-known for his writings and had written 21 discourses about various philosophical and day-to-day life decisions that one would have to make during those times. Gaius's primary philosophical belief is that combating selfishness and preserving the whole human race would create the ideal society. Marcus Aurelius was a notable Roman Emperor in 180 AD. He is considered by many to be the last of the "five good emperors".
The concept of exemplarity was used extensively throughout Roman literature as a tool to give guidance and enforce authority. By providing an ethical framework of societal precedents, exempla served to govern all facets of Roman public life. The system of exemplarity had an inherent power in Roman society, allowing it to be exploited for personal gain by rulers such as Augustus. Through his monumental literary biography, Res Gestae Divi Augusti, Augustus manipulated exemplarity in order to translate his coercive power into benevolent authority over the people of Rome.
In all honesty Charlemagne was a great emperor. He is the reason that the kingdom transitioned into the Modern Europe we know now. His two policies expansion and christianity helped him being a good emperor. He had a vision and he did a really good job at making his vision come true. He wanted all the Germanic people in one kingdom and he wanted them to convert to christianity.
“Charles the Great” The most important part of being emperor isn’t how many people are under one’s rule or how much land is conquered, but creating opportunities within the empire. During the Middle Ages, people were more focused on simple survival and work than learning skills like reading, writing, or officially practicing religion. Charlemagne valued education and worked to spread this throughout the empire. He had great success in many battles, and built a strong military.
Augustus asserted himself as a powerful and benevolent ruler through a variety of means, including his building program, propaganda, public appearances, military victories, and moral reforms. Overall, Augustus established himself as a powerful and benevolent ruler through a combination of building projects, propaganda, public appearances, military victories, and moral reforms. These efforts contributed to his image as a great leader who brought peace, prosperity and stability to Rome. The Forum Augustum and Virgil's Aeneid use Roman history and myth to represent the Roman past and reinforce Augustus' rule as a legitimate continuation of Rome's past glory.
The consequence of this narrative perspective can be assumed that the narration has accelerated, and it may appear, that the empire has been leaded in a rapid change of rulers into the chaos. So, we get fifteen emperors until the fall of Rome. In the end, this led to the dissolution of the Roman Empire, and the senate decided that the imperial dignity would no longer be awarded in Rome, but only in
Pros and Cons of Real Estate Investment Trusts Real estate investment trust provides the opportunity to the investors and the traders to include the real estate in their portfolio. In addition to this some of the real estate may provide high profit whereas other may also be risky. But, there are some risks which are associated with the real estate investment trusts which are not traded. As they are not traded on the stock exchange by the investor and the traders and hence the risk associated with this type of real estate is special type of risks which are: • Lack of liquidity risk: Real estate investment trust which are not traded are not liquid in nature.
