ipl-logo

Executive Branch Research Paper

1032 Words5 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Checks and balances in government

The checks and balances system in The United States of America is set up to avoid the "majority from ruling with an iron fist" (Mount, 2010). The three branches ,Legislative, Judicial, and Executive, were set up in the Constitution. The branches powers and limitations are also stated in the Constitution. While a particular branch might have specific jobs, there are limiting factors that also keep them from becoming too powerful. This slows the efficiency of decision making but that is a purposeful design from its initial set up. With the powers being limited by the other branches, there is not one branch that can become more dominate than the others. The Legislative branch is described in Article 1 of the Constitution. It's main purpose …show more content…

The people vote for their candidates to speak for them in both the Senate and House of Representatives. "As shown by its prime spot at the beginning of the Constitution, the framers initially intended the legislative branch-which they saw as closest to the people-to be the most powerful of the three branches of government." (History.com, Legislative, 2017). Through the years the power of the Legislative branch has lessened and become more equal with the Executive branch. Some of the ways that the Legislative branch holds the Executive branch in check by being able to override Presidential vetoes with a high vote Congress. The Senate approving departmental appointments, treaties and ambassadors. The Legislative branch has the power to declare war. They are set up to check on the Executive branch with the House having impeachment power and the Senate giving the trial for impeachments. They also have the power to enact taxes and allocate funds. The …show more content…

""[The Judicial Branch] may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments."- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 78" (renewamerica.com, 2009). Alexander Hamilton makes a decent argument that the Judicial branch is not able to do as much on their end with checks and balances. To overcome this, the Judicial branch would need to garner more power with the laws and decisions that they provide. While the basis of the Judicial branch is to help to discern the meaning of the constitution and to validate the bills and laws that are in place, the would need to be able to help lead the Legislative branch into designing laws that would be more exact with the constitution and the core foundations that the nation was built upon. Because the positions in the Supreme Court are delegated by the President and approved by Congress there is a limiting factor on who may be allowed to serve on the Supreme Court, however they are not limited by term as to their length of service and may remain in service to the Supreme Court for as long as they like or until they are removed by the Legislative branch. By giving the Judicial branch more power to stop or change laws from the legislative branch or executive orders from the executive branch they

Show More
Related
1067 Words | 5 Pages

The legislative branch consists of the two houses of Congress that have been decided upon by the Great Compromise (the House of Representatives and the Senate). Joint together as one system, Congress has the powers to create laws, declare war, override veto, and impeach the president. Secondly, the executive branch—consisting of the president, vice president, and the Cabinet—has the power to carry out laws (approve), negotiate foreign treaties—such as alliances—, and can grant pardons for federal offers. Finally, the judicial branch, or the Supreme Court Justices can interpret laws, declare laws unconstitutional, and declare the president unconstitutional. Having three branches of government helps keep the government in check, and it prevents one branch becoming more powerful than the other branches.

Read More
310 Words | 2 Pages

The judicial review strengthens the constitutional principle of checks and balances. In the 1789 judiciary act and Judiciary act of 1801 had the right to allow the writs of mandamus. Meaning that they court should have power and including the fact that they are forced to do something. John Marshall weakened the power of the supreme court by getting rid of the power. However he did improve the branch by creating the judicial review.

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

In addition, James Madison stated the idea of Checks and Balances and what it will do to the government, “...the constant aim is to divide and arrange the several offices in such a manner as that they may be a check on the other... The three branches should not be so far separated as to have no constitutional control over each other.” This statement means that each branch should have a different power, so they wouldn’t have any constitutional control over each other. That makes each branch check on the other branches to make sure they are doing everything correctly. One way that the Judicial Branch can check on the Legislative Branch is that when Congress creates laws, the Court can declare laws unconstitutional because some laws might not be a good idea for the people of the country, so the Judicial has the power to take away the possible law.

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

All three branches have different powers to help keep our country tyranny free. The final main way our constitution avoids tyranny is by the big states vs. small states. The number of representatives in the House of Representatives is chosen through the population size of the state. However, the Senate consists of two senators from each state. This little system helps the smaller states not be as easily overruled by bigger

Read More
533 Words | 3 Pages

According to Articles I, II, and III in the U.S. Constitution, the federal government is divided into three different branches with all different jobs. This means that each branch is separate and cannot have all the power. For example, the President cannot make a person guilty, that’s the Court’s job. James Madison states in the Federalist Papers #47 that, 1788.“...(L)iberty requires that the three great departments of power should be separate and distinct.” This means that the government is split up into three different and separate branches, the legislative, executive, and judicial branches, so that we can be free from tyranny.

Read More
557 Words | 3 Pages

The Judicial Branch is the judge of any laws that the President or Congress passes, they decide if the law goes along with the Constitution. Without this system our government would fall into a complete disaster and most likely become a dictatorship. Given these points, it is obvious that the power in our government needs to be

Read More
781 Words | 4 Pages

Regulating the branches of government is crucial to the success of our country, so the constitution laid out the concept of “checks and balances”. For example, the president can veto any bill passed by legislature. In this case, the executive branch checks the legislative branch of government. If this wasn’t possible, congress could pass any bill they want, and ultimately become a powerhouse. These guidelines help keep the government intact, and in turn keep the constitution intact.

Read More
2126 Words | 9 Pages

They have power to ensure the law is constitutional. If it is not, the Supreme Court has the power to deem the law unconstitutional which causes it to be nullified. Within the Federalist papers one of their main focuses was explaining the power of checks and balances. Each branch of government had a power to keep the other from getting too powerful. In Federalist Paper No. 51 Madison writes, “If men were

Read More
801 Words | 4 Pages

But the legislative branch decides who goes into the judicial branch, can override the veto, and impeach the president. The judicial branch can say the presidents acts are unconstitutional, but the president (part of executive branch) nominates judges who are in the judicial branch. Lastly, the judicial branch can make laws unconstitutional. Checks and balances protects against tyranny because they gave each of the 3 branches of government several ways of having power over the other 2

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

The main purpose of a judicial branch per Hamilton is to "declare all acts contrary to the manifest tenor of the Constitution void", meaning to rule any laws or policies not in accordance with the Constitution, unconstitutional. He also states that they serve a purpose as an intermediate body between the people and the legislative branch, to check the legislature's

Read More
566 Words | 3 Pages

In addition, the executive branch was responsible for enforcing or vetoing laws passed by Congress (in addition to its other powers). As for the judiciary, it is responsible for interpreting federal laws and the constitution and for overseeing the decisions made by the federal and state courts. Before when it was unable to address economic and boundary disputes, the judiciary under the constitution was able to address a wide range conflicts. Above all, these three branches of government share equal power to prevent one form of government from becoming too

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

To balance out the judicial branch’s power, the legislative branch could change the size of the Supreme Court, commence amendments of the Constitution, and declare inferiority of courts to the Supreme Court. Correspondingly, the executive had much power balancing the other branches’ command, but this branch is famous for executing laws made by the Legislature. Regarding the Legislature, the executive branch had the ability to temporarily suspend appointments, outlaw power, and declare adjournment if, in any case, other houses cannot decide on adjournment. Concerning the Judiciary, the executive branch could employ judges, and this branch also had the power to pardon some crimes. Finally, the Judiciary was also able to hinder the abuse of power of the other two branches of government, and the branch also interpreted the law.

Read More
1190 Words | 5 Pages

The three branches of government—executive, legislature, and judicial—each keep the others from gaining too much power. The executive branch, consisting of the president, is under deeper scrutiny to make sure the branch does not gain too much power because it consists of one person, while the others consist of 9 to 535 people. Because of this, there are a few main components to keep the president in check. The constitution states that the president has the power to make treaties, however, the senate must approve of the treaty by two-thirds vote. In addition, the constitution also states, all appointments made by the president must be approved by the senate as well by a majority vote.

Read More
768 Words | 4 Pages

For the legislative branch, the House and the Senate is in charge of monitoring whatever goes on in the government, as well as the Judicial branch who has

Read More
567 Words | 3 Pages

Out of 375 species of sharks, only two dozen are dangerous to humans. Tiger sharks, Ocearch research, protection, and nonfiction signposts teach us about sharks habitats and help us conserve them. Tiger sharks are aquatic creatures. They tend to live in tropical or subtropical waters, but they sometimes migrate, to follow prey. According to Shark Sider, “Tiger sharks have indiscriminate appetites.”

Read More

More about Executive Branch Research Paper

Related Topics

Open Document