ipl-logo

Explain The Establishment And Breakdown Of The First Triumvirate

1429 Words6 Pages

The establishment and breakdown of the First Triumvirate The Establishment of the First Triumvirate took place in 60 BCE when three political powers in Rome felt like their achievements were being completely disregarded by the Senate of Rome. Gaius Julius Caesar was an accomplished statesmen, Gnaius Pompeius Magnus, otherwise known Pompey a popular military and political leader and Marcus Licinius Crassus was richest man in Rome, a roman general and politician set aside their differences to form an alliance, a non legally binding agreement, in order to further their political careers. During the alliance of these political powers, many rules and legislations were created and the most powerful people, the optimates, became extremely disempowered. …show more content…

The alliance was formed in 60 bc after the roman senate, which included some of the most influential members of society, and controlled all legislative and state matters, led by Cato denied and disregarded each of these political figures. Caesar wanted triumph for what he achieved in spain, military glory, and a chance to run for consul. Pompey wanted a land bill, he promised, passed for his veterans, the eastern settlement and to marry one of catos nieces. Crassus wanted a tax rebate for financing equestrian class and power,however money alone couldn’t achieve this.Lily Ross Taylor (modern historian) agrees with Plutarch(ancient historian) by stating that Caesar Pompey and Crassus were becoming extremely frustrated with the activities of the optimates in the senate, they knew that with their enemies in control of the senate,none of them will be able to achieve their goals. Caesar masterminded the formation of the Triumvirate as he was already friends with crassus after he supported his actions to claim egypt as a tributary to rome and he was in debt to crassus because he and solidified his alliance with pompey by offering him his daughter Julias hand in marriage. The Power of these men was exemplified through their fantastic military reputations and their wealth. An allegiance between them would prove to dominate the roman political system. The establishment of the First Triumvirate resulted in many significant actions including the disempowerment of the optimates, the creating of some legislation and Caesar being elected for consul in 59

Show More
Related
722 Words | 3 Pages

Likelyhood of Julius Caesar, one of Romes most feared leaders, and Abraham Lincoln, one of Americas greatest presidents having much in common, wasn't much I thought. With more research I realized they had more in common like, they both had statues erected in their honor, there empires say a civil war close to there rain there's more I became fascinated on. In 60 BC, Caesar, Crassus and Pompey formed a political alliance that dominated Roman politics for several years. Their attempts to amass power as Populares were opposed by the Optimates within Romes Senate, among them Cato the Younger with the frequent support of Cicero.

Read More
583 Words | 3 Pages

Octavian, who would later be known as Augustus, was the adopted grandnephew of Julius Caesar. After Julius Caesar’s death, Octavian would join with two other rulers named Mark Antony and Lepidus. Together they would become the second triumvirate or group of three rulers. Jealousy took over, and Octavian was the final ruler left of the three. Octavian changed his name to Augustus and became the new emperor of Rome.

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

The Gracchi brothers, Tiberius and Gaius, had intentions of making Rome the best it could be, which contradicted the visions of the Senators. The two brothers grew up during a tough time in the Roman Empire, but they took it upon themselves to make a difference. “The Empire went through tremendous growth, through both acquisition of land, slaves, and various citizen classes.” This drastic growth ultimately led to a fall in the Roman political system. Tiberius, the older brother, founded the idea of the agrarian laws, which was later continued by his younger brother, Gaius, after his death.

Read More
1993 Words | 8 Pages

After Octavian and his men beat Antony he returned home to Rome the senate refused to pay Octavian’s legions after they had won the battle for Rome. This lead to Octavian marching on Rome with his men demanding both consulship for himself and for his men to be paid. Octavian’s new title as a consul gave him the imperium he wanted to be able to lead his army. While Antony and Octavian were on opposing sides, the battle of Mutina did lead to their eventual alliance in the Second Triumvirate. This three man government of Antony, Octavian and Lepidus gave both Antony and Octavian the power they

Read More
1504 Words | 7 Pages

The alliance combined Caesar’s enormous popularity and legal reputation with Crassus’s fantastic wealth and influence and Pompey’s equally spectacular wealth and military reputation. The formation of the first triumvirate was critical due to the fact “ it’s formation was the turning point in the history of the free state” (Scullard), which determined the fate of the republic declining. The effect of Scullard sources is resource efficient and reliable as he heightens our understanding about the military and political happenings of the time. When Crassus died after the battle of Carrhae, Pompey gradually drifted with his alliance with Caesar. Caesar’s popularity with the people soared, presenting a threat to the power of the senate and to Pompey.

Read More
562 Words | 3 Pages

Caesar himself documented a letter in 46 BC, stating his political aims to achieve ‘peace for the provinces, and security for the Empire’ (source 11). Although possibly serving as propaganda, Caesar essentially represents himself as champion of Rome. This did indeed occur, as Caesar established stability by establishing a uniform system of government among the provinces, and also reforming the tax system in order to reduce corruption (source 9). In addition, measures were passed in order to relieve debt and stabilise the economy, while the amount of senators was increased to 900, simultaneously increasing the number of praetors, questers and aediles (source 9). By increasing the number of senatorial positions, essentially, Caesar was transferring power to the plebeians, which is an obvious contradiction to claims Caesar was merely seeking personal glory, as his power was used to enhance

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

In the play The Tragedy of Julius Caesar Caesar says in (Act III, Scene i, Line 77) “ Et tu Brute?” . This quote is important because these were Caesar’s last words before dying. The quote translates to “ You too Brutus?”. Which brings up the question “ Was Marcus Brutus right about killing Caesar”.

Read More
1525 Words | 7 Pages

From this unrest arose the second triumvirate. This triumvirate was composed of Antony, Lepidus, and Octavian. The second triumvirate lasted for about one decade after the murder of Caesar.

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

Livia as history most often knows her as the wife of Augustus for over fifty years from 38 BC her husband’s death in 14 AD it a very long time in view of life expectancy in ancient Rome. They remained married despite the fact that she had no children. Livia’s position as first lady of the imperial household, her own family connections, her confident personality and her private wealth allowed her to exercise power during his lifetime and afterward. All the Julio-Claudian emperors were her direct descendants: Tiberius was her son; Gaius (Caligula) , her great-grandson; Claudius , her grandson; Nero , her great-great-grandson. Livia did not have an impressive pedigree.

Read More
913 Words | 4 Pages

The Senate decided this was an opportunity for Pompey to take charge although many Senators became concerned of what may result in giving one man so much power. They had such reason to fear this as in 70BC a joint consulship was elected by the Popular Assembly between Pompey and Marcus Licinius Crassus, an extremely wealthy Roman general and politician. Although Sulla had in place, laws to prevent Pompey reaching such office at such a young age (34), Pompey’s overwhelming popularity easily overcame these obstacles and held no reason to pass through normal stages of office. The joint consulship of Crassus and Pompey was one of the most crucial political developments in the fall of the Roman Republic. It allowed for laws to once again be changed including restoring the power of tribunes.

Read More
396 Words | 2 Pages

What we think about Brutus being Noble... It came to terms knowing to think that Brutus might’ve done the right thing because, although Caesar was trying to bring the city of Rome down and someone had to stop him. For this, we know that Brutus was the hero of Rome and then his life soon ended in the heat of battle. Brutus and the conspirators were trying to make Rome a great city again, but this time under Brutus’s rule, But It ended badly.

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

Determination, strong alliances, and keeping her family's dynasty alive were all the key components Cleopatra needed to restore Egypt. According to Grochowski “Cleopatra used any means necessary to complete her goals and protect the country she loved, known as Egypt” (Grochowski 1). Cleopatra acquired a bad reputation because of her background but she did many things to make Egypt her top priority. Although she was not fit to be the ruler of Egypt, Cleopatra did restore Egypt to former glory because of her determination, strong alliances, and hunger to keep her family’s dynasty alive. Cleopatra also known as “Cleopatra VII Philopator” completed a large amount of task, during her reign, but the one that stood out the most was her powerful scheming.

Read More
1255 Words | 6 Pages

This paper will show you how Julius Caesar became the man he was and the pros and cons of his leadership. Before Caesar’s monarchy, he was a successful leader of armies. His victories in the Gallic wars only heightened his want for power. By 51 B.C. Julius’ ability to run a military was incomparable, which alone jeopardized Pompey’s leading. Thus, in 50 B.C. Pompey ordered Caesar to disband his army, step down from his military command, and return to Rome.

Read More
508 Words | 3 Pages

Julius Caesar was the Dictator of Rome in 42 BC who accomplished many things. Many people believed that he was a hero, but Julius Caesar was a very ambitious dictator and was more of a villain than a hero. Julius Caesar was a villain because he didn’t think first before doing something, he forced the Senate to name him dictator for life and he also was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. To begin with, Julius Caesar was a was a glory hound and put his needs before the republic. Caesar used his power as dictator more towards his advantage instead of helping the people in Rome.

Read More
793 Words | 4 Pages

Till then, Caesar had achieved fair amount of political success but he still wasn’t much popular among his peers. In order to fulfill his dream of developing Rome, Caesar needed more political success through alliances. He found the best two alliances that would take him further to the path of success. He first aligned with the Roman General Pompey then he allied with a powerful Roman politician Crassus. Further, Caesar’s alliance with Pompey was strengthened with the marriage of Caesar’s only daughter Julia with Pompey.

Read More

More about Explain The Establishment And Breakdown Of The First Triumvirate

Related Topics

Open Document