Contention: The Australian government should not increase the English level for citizenship test.
Audience: Australian government
Persona: A private school student from a migrant family.
Good morning ladies and gentlemen,
Here is a scenario you probably would never see in your life. Every year in Australia, many of the refugees risk their life and cross their country to this promised land, seeking for a better life for their broken family. However, the promised land is now fenced off and the fence keeps growing. On April 4, 2016, the Minister of Immigration and Border Protection, Peter Dutton announced that the requirement of English level for the Australian citizenship test will be increased to ensure commitment to ‘Australian value’. While previously prospective citizens only need to demonstrate ‘basic’ English skills, now they would
…show more content…
It’s unreasonably and ridiculously difficult. But is it necessary? Learning English is long-term accumulated process and such a clear-cut high standard test is not going to help. We might all agree that it's necessary to speak and understand spoken English adequately so we can live here comfortably and independently, but the new proposed test also requires the ability to write essays, construct written logical arguments with near-perfect spelling and grammar. Certainly not everyone needs to write argumentative pieces in their daily life. Ironically, the Turnbull government’s proposed citizenship English test would require migrants to have a better command of the language than “many Australia-born citizens”, according to the Human Rights Commission. While the test demands a university-level standard of English, the percentage of the Australian population aged 15 and above with a Bachelor’s degree or higher is lower than 20%. Therefore the proposed English language test is adopting a standard that is too high and above that needed to achieve the aim of